Raw Data Fig 5. 10 healthy male urine ratio and count,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"Using the flow cytometric method described above, each m/lEVs characterized was counted, and the ratio of the total m/lEVs excluding nonspecific binding is shown.",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Here is the result of 10 male healthy people about the m/lEVs derived from each urinary cell .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
m/lEVs ratio( % whole),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,An5,healthy urine 1,healthy urine 2,healthy urine 3,healthy urine 4,healthy urine 5,healthy urine 6,healthy urine 7,healthy urine 8,healthy urine 9,healthy urine 10,,Average,SD,min,max
"Multiple peptidase
 positive",An5+ CD10+ CD13+ CD26+　MUC1-,+,2.20%,4.10%,3.30%,21%,17.20%,27.90%,10%,9.80%,2.50%,4.10%,,10%,9.00%,2.20%,28%
,An5- CD10+ CD13+ CD26+　MUC1-,-,68%,45%,32%,25%,21%,11%,35%,50%,43%,54%,,38%,17%,11%,68%
"MUC1
positive",An5+ MUC1+ CD13-,+,2.00%,7.70%,3.80%,2.00%,6.50%,3.50%,12%,4.00%,2.00%,9.10%,,5.20%,3.40%,2.00%,12%
,An5- MUC1+　CD13-,-,3.40%,1.70%,5.90%,0.99%,1.40%,0.82%,9.40%,2.60%,3.10%,2.80%,,3.20%,2.60%,0.82%,9.40%
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
m/lEVs count,,An5,healthy urine 1,healthy urine 2,healthy urine 3,healthy urine 4,healthy urine 5,healthy urine 6,healthy urine 7,healthy urine 8,healthy urine 9,healthy urine 10,,,,,
"Multiple peptidase
 positive","whole count
 (Non-specific binding to mIgG was excluded )",,9490,9695,9331,9029,6277,4756,8491,8627,1049,9567,,,,,
,An5+ CD10+ CD13+ CD26+　MUC1-,+,205,400,308,1937,1082,1325,871,845,26,396,,,,,
,An5- CD10+ CD13+ CD26+　MUC1-,-,6416,4408,3007,2217,1328,544,3010,4306,449,5188,,,,,
"MUC1
positive","whole count
 (Non-specific binding to mIgG was excluded )",,9490,9695,9331,9029,6277,4756,8491,8627,1049,9567,,,,,
,An5+ MUC1+ CD13-,+,194,742,352,177,411,167,997,349,21,866,,,,,
,An5- MUC1+　CD13-,-,327,165,547,89,85,39,802,221,32,267,,,,,