Cost_ID,Repository,Reference_ID,Reference_title,Authors,Abstract,Publication_year,Language,Type_of_material,Previous_materials,Availability,Kingdom,Phylum,Class,Order,Family,Genus,Species,Subspecies,Common_name,Environment,Environment_IAS,HabitatVerbatim,Habitat,urbanArea,protectedArea,Island,Geographic_region,Official_country,State|Province|Administrative_area,Location,Spatial_scale,Period_of_estimation,Time_range,Probable_starting_year,Probable_ending_year,Probable_starting_year_adjusted,Probable_ending_year_adjusted,Occurrence,Raw_cost_estimate_local_currency,Min_Raw_cost_estimate_local_currency,Max_Raw_cost_estimate_local_currency,Raw_cost_estimate_2017_USD_exchange_rate,Raw_cost_estimate_2017_USD_PPP,Cost_estimate_per_year_local_currency,Cost_estimate_per_year_2017_USD_exchange_rate,Cost_estimate_per_year_2017_USD_PPP,Currency,Applicable_year,Type_of_applicable_year,Implementation,Acquisition_method,Impacted_sector,Type_of_cost,Type_of_cost_merged,Management_type,Method_reliability,Method_reliability_refined,Method_reliability_Explanation,Method_reliability_Expert_Name,Overlap,Benefit_value(s),Details,Initial contributors_names,Double-checking
297,WoS,696,Pandora’s box down-under: origins and numbers of mustelids transported to New Zealand for biological control of rabbits,King,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Southland/Otago,Site,1883-1892,Period,1883,1892,1883,1892,One-time,54280.00,,,69858.20,51721.97,5428.00,6985.82,5172.20,GBP,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of biological control of rabbits by releasing  stoats and weasels (ferrets excluded from the analysis, as costs cannot be estimated). Value in abstract is 5441GBP at least; in table 5428GBP. No details on where the data come from. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
481,TC,371,Introduced mammals of New Zealand,Wodzicki,,1950,English,Official report,"Flux, J. E. ., Duthie, A. G., Robinson, T. J., & Chapman, J. A. (1990). Exotic populations. In J. A. Chapman & J. E. C. Flux (Eds.), Rabbits, Hares and Pikas: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan (pp. 147–153). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1945,Year,1945,Unspecified,1945,1945,Potentially ongoing,3750000.00,3500000.00,4000000.00,,,3750000.00,,,GBP,1945,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"Report : In New Zealand, Wodzicki (1950) estimated rabbit damage in terms of reduced sheep-carrying capacity to be £3.5-4 million in 1945, compared with income of £1.3 million from rabbit exports"" 
/!\ currency ""f"" must be symbol ""£"" ?!",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
851,TC,313,Estimation of grain loss to sparrows (Passer domesticus) in New Zealand,Dawson,,1970,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Macgregor-Fors, I., Calderón-Parra, R., Meléndez-Herrada, A., López-López, S., & Schondube, J. E. (2011). Pretty, but dangerous! Records of non-native Monk Parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus) in Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 82, 1053–1056. Retrieved from http://www.ib.unam.mx/m/revista/pdfs/34-739.pdf ID8523",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Passeridae,Passer,Passer domesticus,,House sparrow,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1968,Year,1968,Unspecified,1968,1968,Potentially ongoing,28500.00,13000.00,44000.00,201525.26,337331.40,28500.00,201525.26,337331.40,NZD,1970,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,Eleven wheat crops were surveyed in Hawke's Bay in 1968. The results suggest that house sparrows took between 2.6 -8.4% of the grain produced (about 320000 bushels) valued at NZ.$1.50 each. = 13 000 - 44 000 NZD,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
314,TC,602,Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand,Livingstone et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Tait, P., Saunders, C., Nugent, G., & Rutherford, P. (2017). Valuing conservation benefits of disease control in wildlife: A choice experiment approach to bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand’s native forests. Journal of Environmental Management, 189, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.045 (id 941)",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1977,Year,1977,Unspecified,1977,1977,Potentially ongoing,3000000.00,,,11776013.97,15692451.86,3000000.00,11776013.97,15692451.86,NZD,1977,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Programmes were initiated in 1972 (Davidson 1991). By 1977, possum control was being undertaken by the New Zealand Forest Service (and Agricultural Pest Destruction Boards (Adlam 1977) at a cost of approximately $3 million per year /!\ may come from Hutchings et al. 2013. Possums as vectors of TB.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
309,TC,602,Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand,Livingstone et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1978-1984,Year,1978,1984,1978,1984,One-time,500000.00,,,360601.01,353282.71,500000.00,360601.01,353282.71,NZD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"[O'Hara, 2015, Personal communication] ""In view of the apparent success of the possum control programme in the mid-1970s, and due to pressure on funds from the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, possum control funding was reduced (Tweddle and Livingstone 1994) to approximately $500,000 per year between 1978 and 1984 (PJ O’Hara, pers.comm.)."" Possums as vectors of TB ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC9,TC,EMTC_10,Economics of controlling Carduus nutans on grazed pasture in New Zealand,Moore et al,,1989,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Carduus,Carduus nutan,,Thistle,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Unit (ha),June over 10 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,1979,1989,One-time,2.00,,,2.36,2.55,0.18,0.21,0.23,NZD,1989,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,yes,The reported cost refers to herbicide applied annually at the rate of 2 kg a.i./ha in 5% of Thitle ground cover in June over 10 years ,Elena Manfrini,No
99,WoS,16689,"The eradication of introduced Australian brushtail possums, Trichosurus vulpecula, from Kapiti Island, a New Zealand nature reserve",Cowan,,1992,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Kapiti Island,Site,1980-1987,Period,1980,1987,1980,1987,One-time,850000.00,,,1082096.21,1247307.41,106250.00,135262.03,155913.43,NZD,1987,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Total direct costs between 1980 and 1987 amounted to about NZ $850 000 (in 1987 dollars), of which less than NZ $50 000 was spent catching the first 11 500 possums and about NZ $220 000 the last 80",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1831,TC,37,The estimated costs of weeds to the agricultural sector of the New Zealand economy,Monsanto New Zealand Limited,,1984,English,Discussion paper,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,IAS plants - “weeds”,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1982,Year,1982,Unspecified,1982,1982,Potentially ongoing,52900000.00,,,100833268.26,178044767.64,52900000.00,100833268.26,178044767.64,NZD,1982,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,NA,Ivan Jaric,Yes
217,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Tawhitinui,Site,1983,Year,1983,Unspecified,1983,1983,Potentially ongoing,4225.00,,,5629.70,6474.81,4225.00,5629.70,6474.81,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
213,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rurima,Site,1984,Year,1984,Unspecified,1984,1984,Potentially ongoing,7366.00,,,9815.00,11288.39,7366.00,9815.00,11288.39,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
381,TC,292,"Eradication campaigns against kiore (Rattus exulans) on Rurima Rocks and Korapuki Island, Northern New Zealand",McFadden and Towns,,1991,English,Official report,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rurima,Unit (8 Ha),1983-1984,Year,1983,1984,1984,1984,One-time,9985.00,,,11175.38,12181.18,9985.00,11175.38,12181.18,NZD,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Gross total cost => 9985$
9000 Implementation + 2000 Isolation from Holmes et al
Philips 2015 : Rurima—Total reported cost was $11 K, all in implementation, citing McFadden and Towns (1991).
• McFadden and Towns (1991, Appendix 2, p. 18) provide isolation (travel cost); Holmes et al. omit these data from that cost center",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC1428,,Sandrey1985,Biological control of gorse: an ex-ante evaluation,Sandrey RA,,1985,English,Official report,Saunders et al 2017,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Ulex,Ulex europaeus,,gorse,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b\12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1984-5,Year,1984,1984,1984,1984,Potentially ongoing,8000000.00,,,10701025.18,17895887.22,8000000.00,10701025.18,17895887.22,NZD,1984,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,yes,namechecks an unobtainable Monsanto (1984) report for alternative (& reportedly deficient) estimate of 150 million. Benefits to beekeepers,,No
SC1576,,Sandrey1985,Biological control of gorse: an ex-ante evaluation,Sandrey RA,,1985,English,Official report,Saunders et al 2017,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Ulex,Ulex europaeus,,gorse,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b\12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1984-5,Year,1984,1985,1984,1985,Potentially ongoing,17818000.00,,,23833858.34,39858614.82,17818000.00,23833858.34,39858614.82,NZD,1984,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,yes,namechecks an unobtainable Monsanto (1984) report for indirect lost opportunity costs of up to 150 million. Benefits to beekeepers not costed but described,,No
SC1753,,Bourdot2007,Pastoral weeds in New Zealand: Status and potential solutions,"Bourdot, G.W., Fowler, S.V., Edwards, G.R., Kriticos, D.J., Kean, J.M., Rahman, A., Parsons, A.J.","Currently there are some 187 plant
species, almost all exotic in origin, occurring as
""weeds"" in pastures in New Zealand. Judging from their occurrence in scientific papers published in the
proceedings of the New Zealand Plant Protection
Society, 65 of these species are, or have been considered
historically, to be significant pastoral weeds.
While 34 of these pastoral weeds are currently being
managed under Regional Pest Management Strategies,
15 of these regionally managed species are
apparently un-researched in New Zealand, implying
that their management does not have a scientific
basis. The aggregate cost of pastoral weeds to the
New Zealand economy is estimated to be NZ$1.2
billion per annum, based on an analysis made in
1984, but this analysis is hampered by a lack of both
objective data on the impacts of weeds on pastoral
production and an accurate and comprehensive national
census of the main problem species. Ongoing
naturalisations, from an existing pool of exotic plant
species estimated currently at 25 000, and new arrivals
through international trade in plant species
and germplasm, can be expected to steadily add
to the list of pastoral weeds. Prioritisation of these
weed species will be necessary if New Zealand's
pastoral agricultural industries are to make longterm,
economically optimal decisions about their
management. Such prioritisation will require robust
models of their current and potential distributions,
their rates of population increase and spread, a full
understanding of the merits and pitfalls of alternative
control options, and robust models of their impacts
on pastoral productivity.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Pastoral weeds,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1984,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1984,1984,Potentially ongoing,53000000.00,,,70894291.84,118560252.86,53000000.00,70894291.84,118560252.86,NZD,1984,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,yes,"The aggregate cost of
pastoral weeds in New Zealand was estimated to be
$393 million ($340 million (losses) + $53 million
(cost of control)) p.a.",Ross Cuthbert,No
SC1983,,Bourdot2007,Pastoral weeds in New Zealand: Status and potential solutions,"Bourdot, G.W., Fowler, S.V., Edwards, G.R., Kriticos, D.J., Kean, J.M., Rahman, A., Parsons, A.J.","Currently there are some 187 plant
species, almost all exotic in origin, occurring as
""weeds"" in pastures in New Zealand. Judging from their occurrence in scientific papers published in the
proceedings of the New Zealand Plant Protection
Society, 65 of these species are, or have been considered
historically, to be significant pastoral weeds.
While 34 of these pastoral weeds are currently being
managed under Regional Pest Management Strategies,
15 of these regionally managed species are
apparently un-researched in New Zealand, implying
that their management does not have a scientific
basis. The aggregate cost of pastoral weeds to the
New Zealand economy is estimated to be NZ$1.2
billion per annum, based on an analysis made in
1984, but this analysis is hampered by a lack of both
objective data on the impacts of weeds on pastoral
production and an accurate and comprehensive national
census of the main problem species. Ongoing
naturalisations, from an existing pool of exotic plant
species estimated currently at 25 000, and new arrivals
through international trade in plant species
and germplasm, can be expected to steadily add
to the list of pastoral weeds. Prioritisation of these
weed species will be necessary if New Zealand's
pastoral agricultural industries are to make longterm,
economically optimal decisions about their
management. Such prioritisation will require robust
models of their current and potential distributions,
their rates of population increase and spread, a full
understanding of the merits and pitfalls of alternative
control options, and robust models of their impacts
on pastoral productivity.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Pastoral weeds,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1984,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1984,1984,Potentially ongoing,340000000.00,,,454793570.29,760575207.04,340000000.00,454793570.29,760575207.04,NZD,1984,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,yes,"The aggregate cost of
pastoral weeds in New Zealand was estimated to be
$393 million ($340 million (losses) + $53 million
(cost of control)) p.a.",Ross Cuthbert,No
108,TC,293,"Eradication campaigns against Rattus norvegicus on the Noises Islands, New Zealand, using brodifacoum and 1080",Moors,,1985,English,Official report,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348UnknownneedAccess=true",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Noises Islands,Unit (Ha),1985,Year,1985,1985,1985,1985,One-time,760.00,,,855.93,1468.68,760.00,855.93,1468.68,NZD,1985,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"""For example, Moors (1985) estimated that th e Noises Islands campaign against Norway rats cos t $760/ha""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC1072,,Greer1990,An Economic Evaluation of the Benefits of Research Into Biological Control of Clematis Vitalba,"Greer, Glen and R.L. Sheppard.","Clematisvitalba,orOldMan'sBeardisaweedwhichisinvadingNewZealand'snativebush.Introducedasagardenspecies,ithasnowspreadintonativebushinmanyareasoftheco~ntryandisregardedasaveryseriousthreattonative'forests.Theplant,adeciduousvine,climbsexistingvegetation,smotheringandeventuallykillingthetreesbelowit.Presentcontrolmeasuresincludechemicalapplicationandhand~cuttingorpulling,buttheweedisstillspreadinginmanyareas.ConsequentlyscientistsareconsideringimplementationofaresearchprogramwiththeaimofidentifyingandintroducingbiologicalagentswhichwouldcontrolClematisvitalba.Aneconomicevaluation,undertakentodeterminewhethersuchresearchisjustified,isthesubjectofthisreport.Thestudycomprisedtwoparts.ThefirstinvolvedtheestimationofthebenefitsofsuchresearchtoNewZealandsociety.Thereisnomarketvalueforscenicresourcessuchasnativebush.Consequentlyanon-marketvaluationtechniqueknownascontingentvaluatiopwasusedtoelicitthecommunity~swillingnesstopayfortheresearch,asaproxyforthebenefitstheyexpecttoreceivefromit.Apostalsurveyof3,000randomlyselectedadultNewZealanderswas.conductedandvalidresponseswerereceivedfrom46percentofthem.Thesecondpartofthestudyconsistedofcollectionandcompilationofdataonexistingcontrolexpen.diturefromlocalauthoritiesandDepartmentofConservationofficers.Threemajorconclusionsemergedfromthestudy.ThefirstwasthatNewZealandersarepreparedtopaysignificantamountsofmoneyforachanceofcontrollingClematisvitalba.Upperandlowerboundestimatesof$111millionand$44millionwereestimated.ThesecondconclusionwasthattheproblemofdamagetonativebushbyClematisvitalbashouldbedealtwithfroman<,tionalperspective.AlthoughtheweedisnotfoundinallregionsofthecountrythestudyfoundthatindividualsfromalloverNewZealandwerepreparedtopaysimilaramountsforresearchintobiologicalcontrol.FinallythestudyconcludesthattheresourcescurrentlydevotedtothecontrolofClematisvitalbaareconsiderablylessthanthevaluetoNewZealandersofpreventingitsfurtherdestructionofnativebush,andthatfundingofresearchintobiologicalcontrolisfullyjustified.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Clematis,Clematis vitalba,,old man's beard,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,1,non-urban,N,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1990,Period,1985,1990,1985,1990,One-time,923253.00,,,1732054.78,1887521.43,153875.50,288675.80,314586.91,USD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Expenditure,Phillip Haubrock,No
SC1282,,Jarvis2006,Predicting the economic benefits and costs of introducing new biological control agents for Scotch broom Cytisus scoparius into New Zealand,"Jarvis PJ, Fowler SV, Paynter Q, Syrett P",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,Saunders et al 2017,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Cytisus,Cytisus scoparius,,Scotch broom,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b\12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1985,Year,1985,1985,1985,1985,Potentially ongoing,3308000.00,,,2576087.52,3393006.56,3308000.00,2576087.52,3393006.56,NZD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,yes,Chemical control only. Benefits from farming production on land currently covered by broom directly attributable to broom control 4968000 NZD annually (then add costs incurred on top equals 8.366millionNZD. Also gives costs to beekeepers of broom control i.e. an estimation of ontribution of broom as a benefit nealry 2.5 million,,No
100,WoS,13836,From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands,Towns and Broome,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Korapuki Island,Unit (Ha),1986,Year,1986,1986,1986,1986,One-time,198.00,,,231.45,332.25,198.00,231.45,332.25,NZD,1986,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"/!\ cost had declined at completion of the campaign, may not be throughout the campaign
Costs had declined to $198/ha when the Korapuki Island campaign was completed in 1986",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
104,TC,292,"Eradication campaigns against kiore (Rattus exulans) on Rurima Rocks and Korapuki Island, Northern New Zealand",McFadden and Towns,,1991,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348UnknownneedAccess=true",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Korapuki Island,Unit (Ha),1986,Year,1986,Unspecified,1986,1986,Potentially ongoing,3560.00,,,3696.15,4293.07,3560.00,3696.15,4293.07,NZD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Total cost of the eradication in 1986, on 18ha 
Net cost total       3560 / Net cost per hectare  198   / Boat charters 1 @ $750  = 750  / Hut        2500 / Gross cost total      6800 / Gross cost per hectare  378 
Costs in the Appendix are detailled, and Methods are well explained.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
109,TC,303,"Eradication of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) from Hawea Island, Fiordland, using brodifacoum",Taylor and Thomas,,1989,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348?needAccess=true
McFadden, I., & Towns, D. (1991). Eradication campaigns against Kiore (Rattus exulans) on Rurima Rocks and Korapuki, Northern New Zealand. Department of Conservation International Report, 97(97), 19. 
Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Hawea Island,Site,1986-1988,Period,1986,1988,1986,1988,One-time,97500.00,,,113969.22,163609.17,32500.00,37989.74,54536.39,NZD,1986,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"""Only 154 person-days were required to complete the eradication campaign and to confirm its success, at a total cost of about $65,000"" NZD assumed

65000$ in original paper. => travel and servicing costs (c. $7,300), + support provided by Fiordland National Park's MV Renown and her crew (c. $27,000). + material less than $700 + total cost salary and wages 30 200$ 
(not very detailed)

In Holmes ""Planning 3000 + Implementation 29000 + 38000 Isolation""
Philips 2015 : Hawea—Total reported cost was $4 K, all in implementation, citing McFadden (1992).
• Taylor and Thomas (1989, p. 28), the primary reference, report cost as $72 K, and is cited in McFadden (1992) reports cost as $71 K.
• Taylor and Thomas (1989) provide isolation (travel cost) and provide information to calcu- late planning cost; Holmes et al. omit these data from those cost centers",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
198,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Hawea Island,Site,1986,Year,1986,Unspecified,1986,1986,Potentially ongoing,36101.00,,,48103.62,55324.76,36101.00,48103.62,55324.76,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
199,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Kapiti Island,Site,1986,Year,1986,Unspecified,1986,1986,Potentially ongoing,149498.00,,,199202.11,229105.60,149498.00,199202.11,229105.60,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
210,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Raoul,Site,1986,Year,1986,Unspecified,1986,1986,Potentially ongoing,551470.00,,,734819.10,845127.48,551470.00,734819.10,845127.48,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
485,TC,506,Ripping the rabbits restores the ranges,Hunt and Rasheed,,1991,English,Newsletter,"Williams, K. (1995). Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits., 1–299. Retrieved from https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b2093380&site=eds-live&scope=site",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,"Unit (400,000 Ha)",5 years,Period,1986,1991,1986,1991,One-time,125000000.00,,,175248802.09,261309675.24,25000000.00,35049760.42,52261935.05,AUD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"""Australia spent $125 000 on rabbit control and increased the carrying capacity of the property by 3000 DSE""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
196,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Great Barrier,Site,1987,Year,1987,Unspecified,1987,1987,Potentially ongoing,32975.00,,,43938.31,50534.17,32975.00,43938.31,50534.17,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
200,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Korapuki Island,Site,1987,Year,1987,Unspecified,1987,1987,Potentially ongoing,3858.00,,,5140.68,5912.38,3858.00,5140.68,5912.38,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
380,TC,292,"Eradication campaigns against kiore (Rattus exulans) on Rurima Rocks and Korapuki Island, Northern New Zealand",McFadden and Towns,,1991,English,Official report,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Korapuki Island,Site,1986-1987,Year,1986,1987,1987,1987,One-time,6800.00,,,7610.67,8295.65,6800.00,7610.67,8295.65,NZD,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"All details are provided. Gross total cost => 6800$ 
Implementation 6000 + Isolation 1000 from Holmes et al.
Coment Philips 2015 : Korapuki—Total reported cost was $7 K, all in implementation, citingMcFaddenandTowns(1991).
• McFadden and Towns (1991, Appendix 2, p. 18) provide isolation (travel cost); Holmes et al. omit these data from that cost center.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
103,TC,489,"Rats eradicated from rugged Breaksea Island (170 ha), Fiordland, New Zealand",Towns and Broome,,1993,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348?needAccess=true",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Breaksea Island,Site,21 days (1988),Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,One-time,82117.00,,,91906.72,100178.47,82117.00,91906.72,100178.47,NZD,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Table 3.total cost 82117 1990 NZD ""The campaign was completed in June 1988 after 21 days of baiting at a cost of $483/ha""  (Taylor & Thomas 1993).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1289,TC,177,An economic evaluation of biological control of rose-grain aphid in New Zealand,Grundy ,,1989,English,Official report,Teulon and Stufkens 2002,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aphididae,Metopolophium,Metopolophium dirhodum,,Rose-grass aphid,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1988,Year,1988,Unspecified,1988,1988,Potentially ongoing,10300000.00,8600000.00,12000000.00,12179669.69,13151083.07,10300000.00,12179669.69,13151083.07,NZD,1989,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed,NA,Low,,,,,no,"Average estimation of yield loss + costs of an associated virus + costs of chemical control in NZ.
A lot of values...
Table 6 summary annual costs ($ 1988)
Direct cost : Average 5-6 M$ [a 1 - 20M$]
Cost of BYDV : 0-1 M$
Cost of chemical control : 3.6 - 5 M$",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC1165,,Denne1998,Economics of nassella tussock (Nassella trichotoma) control in New Zealand,"Denne, T.","his paper questions whether current control of the pasture weed nassella tussock (NasseUa trichotoma (Nees) Hack. ex Arech) is worthwhile, and how management can be improved. A computer model is developed to simulate nassella tussock population growth, and to provide a basis for calculating economic effects. The existing policy objective of eradication is shown to be inappropriate for economic and practical reasons. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that current government control programmes yield positive net benefits at a 10% discount rate, under realistic population growth-rate assumptions. An economic threshold model confirms that control should be undertaken at current levels of infestation. An optimization model suggests that greater net benefits would be obtained with less frequent control operations than currently practiced. ",1998,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella trichotoma,,pasture weed nassella tussock,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,pastureland,12b,non-urban,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,,Country,1 year,Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,One-time,1500000.00,,,2036896.30,2025312.64,1500000.00,2036896.30,2025312.64,NZD,1988,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,total cost of contro,,No
SC1286,,Grundy1990,An economic evaluation of biological control of sweet brier,Grundy TP,,1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Saunders et al 2017,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rosa,Rosa rubiginosa,,sweet brier,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b\12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1988,Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,Potentially ongoing,3350000.00,2100000.00,4600000.00,4549068.41,4523198.23,3350000.00,4549068.41,4523198.23,NZD,1988,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed,NA,High,,,,,yes,"Costs in Table 12, pg 33. Benefits as shelter & fodder plant. Official report from 1989, converted in peer review article 1990",,No
SC1336,,Scott1984,Hawkweeds in run and mountain country grasslands,Scott D,,1984,English,Official report,Saunders et al 2017,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Brassicales,Brassicaceae,Pilosella,Pilosella sp.,,hawkweeds,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b\12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1988,Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,Potentially ongoing,4400000.00,,,5974895.83,5940917.07,4400000.00,5974895.83,5940917.07,NZD,1988,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,,,No
190,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Double Islands (Larger island),Site,1989,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,3271.00,,,4358.52,5012.81,3271.00,4358.52,5012.81,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
191,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Double Islands (Smaller island),Site,1989,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,1919.00,,,2557.02,2940.87,1919.00,2557.02,2940.87,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
310,TC,421,"Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Annual Report, Appendix to Journals of House of Representatives",Anonymous ,,1989,English,Official report,"Livingstone, P. G., Hancox, N., Nugent, G., & de Lisle, G. W. (2015). Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 63(0), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2014.971083",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1989,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,3000000.00,,,3547476.61,3830412.54,3000000.00,3547476.61,3830412.54,NZD,1989,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management,Knowledge/funding,Low,,,,,no,"In response to the three-fold increase in numbers of infected herds and TB reactors, government funding for possum control was gradually restored from 1984, reaching $3 million by 1989 (Anonymous 1989;O’Neil and Pharo 1995). Possums as vectors of TB. O'Neil and Pharo 1995 -> figure not found (only graph representing the expenditure for all TB vectors control, including cattle)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC18,TC,EMTC_10,Economics of controlling Carduus nutans on grazed pasture in New Zealand,Moore et al,,1989,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Carduus,Carduus nutan,,Thistle,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Unit (ha),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1989,1989,One-time,6.09,,,7.75,8.94,6.09,7.75,8.94,NZD,1987,Effective,Potential,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,yes,The reported cost is estimated considering each 1% of ground cover is projected to reduce the annual liveweight gain from sheep by 21kg/ha,Elena Manfrini,No
SC2314,,Grundy1989,An Economic Evaluation of Biological Control of Hieracium,Grundy,"Thisreportpresentstheresultsofacost-benefitanalysisofbiologicalcontrolofhieracium.InSouthIslandhighcountryareas,speciesoftheintroducedhieraciumgenusareproblemweeds.Mouse-earhawkweedandkingdevilhawkweedareamongtwoofthemostabundanttussockgrasslandspeciesinsomeareasoftheSouthIslandruncountry.Thesespeciesexcludeotherplantsandreducefeedavailability,socausingalossofagriculturalproduction.Theyalsoexcludenativegrasslandspeciesandrepresentathreattoconservationvalues.Biologicalcontrolappearstobetheonlypracticablecontrolalternativefortheseweedsinmanyregions.Itisestimatedthathieraciumspeciesatpresentreducethevalueofhighcountryagriculturalproductionbybetween$1.1and$4.4millionannually.Noattemptismadetovaluethecostimposedbytheweedstoconservationvalues,althoughthiscostissignificant.Againstthesecosts,hieraciumspecieshavenegligiblebenefits.Thelikelyimpactofbiologicalcontrolonhieraciumspeciesisuncertain.Inordertoestimatethebenefitsofbiocontrol,anumberofscenariosaredeveloped.Adecisiontheoryapproachisdescribedwhichassignsprobabilitiestotheoutcomesofeachscenarioanddeterminesafinalnetexpectedbenefitfortheproposedbiocontrolproject.Thisanalysissuggeststhatundertheassumptionsusedabiocontrolprojectwouldrecoveritscostsabout14yearsafterreleaseofcontrolagents.Theproposedprojecthasaninternalrateofreturnof14.7%andyieldsanexpectedannualbenefitof$205,000onceagentsareassumedtobefullyestablished.Theanalyticalframeworkpresentedprovidesausefultoolforfurtheranalysisoftheassumptionsusedandtheissuesinvolvedinbiologicalcontrol.",1989,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Pilosella,Pilosella officinarum,,Mouse-ear hawk weed and king devil hawk weed,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4,non-urban,N,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1989,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,2750000.00,1100000.00,4400000.00,5437581.51,5871266.45,2750000.00,5437581.51,5871266.45,USD,1989,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,Agricultural losses due to Hieraceum,Phillip Haubrock,No
SC2651,WoS,Stephenson2003,Biosecurity approaches to surveillance and response for new plant pest species,Stephenson BP;Gill GSC; Randall JL; Wilson JA,"The isolation of New Zealand and its natural barriers, such as climate, ocean and
mountains, has meant that it is relatively free of pests. There is, however, a growing risk
of incursions of harmful organisms with increasing volumes of traded goods and tourists
arriving in New Zealand from diverse points of origin. The increased risk of incursion
threatens this country’s diverse primary production and unique flora and fauna. Increased
pressures on our borders have led to the evolution of strategies and technologies for
surveillance, detection and management of new organisms. The success of these strategies
is important when considering that the Plants Biosecurity group of the Ministry of
Agriculture and Forestry (MAF Plants Biosecurity) is faced with 20–30 detected
incursions of new to New Zealand organisms per year.
The scope of MAF Plants Biosecurity’s responsibilities currently covers plants used
in agriculture and horticulture. This paper describes the existing components of MAF
Plants Biosecurity’s surveillance arrangements, and discusses the challenge of enhancing
the system to enable detection of significant pests in time to eradicate.",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,Kean and Stringer 2019_Optimising the seasonal deployment of surveillance traps for detection of incipient pest invasions,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,,,,Fruit fly,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,Agriculture,12b,,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,,Country,1989-2003,Year,1989,2003,1989,2003,One-time,1000000.00,,,773749.52,889816.41,1000000.00,773749.52,889816.41,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Surveillance,Management,Pre-invasion management,High,,,,,no,The traps are monitored every two weeks during the spring summer and autumn months and the current program costs approximately $NZ1 million annually,Celine Albert/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
183,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Breaksea Island,Site,1990,Year,1990,Unspecified,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,48796.00,,,65019.37,74779.84,48796.00,65019.37,74779.84,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC409,,Greer1990,An Economic Evaluation of the Benefits of Research Into Biological Control of Clematis Vitalba,"Greer, Glen and R.L. Sheppard.","Clematisvitalba,orOldMan'sBeardisaweedwhichisinvadingNewZealand'snativebush.Introducedasagardenspecies,ithasnowspreadintonativebushinmanyareasoftheco~ntryandisregardedasaveryseriousthreattonative'forests.Theplant,adeciduousvine,climbsexistingvegetation,smotheringandeventuallykillingthetreesbelowit.Presentcontrolmeasuresincludechemicalapplicationandhand~cuttingorpulling,buttheweedisstillspreadinginmanyareas.ConsequentlyscientistsareconsideringimplementationofaresearchprogramwiththeaimofidentifyingandintroducingbiologicalagentswhichwouldcontrolClematisvitalba.Aneconomicevaluation,undertakentodeterminewhethersuchresearchisjustified,isthesubjectofthisreport.Thestudycomprisedtwoparts.ThefirstinvolvedtheestimationofthebenefitsofsuchresearchtoNewZealandsociety.Thereisnomarketvalueforscenicresourcessuchasnativebush.Consequentlyanon-marketvaluationtechniqueknownascontingentvaluatiopwasusedtoelicitthecommunity~swillingnesstopayfortheresearch,asaproxyforthebenefitstheyexpecttoreceivefromit.Apostalsurveyof3,000randomlyselectedadultNewZealanderswas.conductedandvalidresponseswerereceivedfrom46percentofthem.Thesecondpartofthestudyconsistedofcollectionandcompilationofdataonexistingcontrolexpen.diturefromlocalauthoritiesandDepartmentofConservationofficers.Threemajorconclusionsemergedfromthestudy.ThefirstwasthatNewZealandersarepreparedtopaysignificantamountsofmoneyforachanceofcontrollingClematisvitalba.Upperandlowerboundestimatesof$111millionand$44millionwereestimated.ThesecondconclusionwasthattheproblemofdamagetonativebushbyClematisvitalbashouldbedealtwithfroman<,tionalperspective.AlthoughtheweedisnotfoundinallregionsofthecountrythestudyfoundthatindividualsfromalloverNewZealandwerepreparedtopaysimilaramountsforresearchintobiologicalcontrol.FinallythestudyconcludesthattheresourcescurrentlydevotedtothecontrolofClematisvitalbaareconsiderablylessthanthevaluetoNewZealandersofpreventingitsfurtherdestructionofnativebush,andthatfundingofresearchintobiologicalcontrolisfullyjustified.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Clematis,Clematis vitalba,,old man's beard,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,1,non-urban,N,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rotorua,Site,1990,Year,1990,Unspecified,1990,1990,One-time,10000.00,,,18760.35,20444.25,10000.00,18760.35,20444.25,USD,1990,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,pers. Comm of expenditure,Phillip Haubrock,No
SC1009,,Grundy1989,An Economic Evaluation of Biological Control of Hieracium,Grundy,"Thisreportpresentstheresultsofacost-benefitanalysisofbiologicalcontrolofhieracium.InSouthIslandhighcountryareas,speciesoftheintroducedhieraciumgenusareproblemweeds.Mouse-earhawkweedandkingdevilhawkweedareamongtwoofthemostabundanttussockgrasslandspeciesinsomeareasoftheSouthIslandruncountry.Thesespeciesexcludeotherplantsandreducefeedavailability,socausingalossofagriculturalproduction.Theyalsoexcludenativegrasslandspeciesandrepresentathreattoconservationvalues.Biologicalcontrolappearstobetheonlypracticablecontrolalternativefortheseweedsinmanyregions.Itisestimatedthathieraciumspeciesatpresentreducethevalueofhighcountryagriculturalproductionbybetween$1.1and$4.4millionannually.Noattemptismadetovaluethecostimposedbytheweedstoconservationvalues,althoughthiscostissignificant.Againstthesecosts,hieraciumspecieshavenegligiblebenefits.Thelikelyimpactofbiologicalcontrolonhieraciumspeciesisuncertain.Inordertoestimatethebenefitsofbiocontrol,anumberofscenariosaredeveloped.Adecisiontheoryapproachisdescribedwhichassignsprobabilitiestotheoutcomesofeachscenarioanddeterminesafinalnetexpectedbenefitfortheproposedbiocontrolproject.Thisanalysissuggeststhatundertheassumptionsusedabiocontrolprojectwouldrecoveritscostsabout14yearsafterreleaseofcontrolagents.Theproposedprojecthasaninternalrateofreturnof14.7%andyieldsanexpectedannualbenefitof$205,000onceagentsareassumedtobefullyestablished.Theanalyticalframeworkpresentedprovidesausefultoolforfurtheranalysisoftheassumptionsusedandtheissuesinvolvedinbiologicalcontrol.",1989,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Pilosella,Pilosella officinarum,,Mouse-ear hawk weed and king devil hawk weed,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4,non-urban,N,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1989,Year,1990,1991,1990,1991,One-time,650000.00,,,1285246.54,1387753.89,650000.00,1285246.54,1387753.89,USD,1989,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Costs for research project,Phillip Haubrock,No
SC1010,,Grundy1990,An Economic Evaluation of Biological Control of Sweet Brier,Grundy,"Thisreportpresentstheresultsofacost-benefitanalysisofbiologicalcontrolofhieracium.InSouthIslandhighcountryareas,speciesoftheintroducedhieraciumgenusareproblemweeds.Mouse-earhawkweedandkingdevilhawkweedareamongtwoofthemostabundanttussockgrasslandspeciesinsomeareasoftheSouthIslandruncountry.Thesespeciesexcludeotherplantsandreducefeedavailability,socausingalossofagriculturalproduction.Theyalsoexcludenativegrasslandspeciesandrepresentathreattoconservationvalues.Biologicalcontrolappearstobetheonlypracticablecontrolalternativefortheseweedsinmanyregions.Itisestimatedthathieraciumspeciesatpresentreducethevalueofhighcountryagriculturalproductionbybetween$1.1and$4.4millionannually.Noattemptismadetovaluethecostimposedbytheweedstoconservationvalues,althoughthiscostissignificant.Againstthesecosts,hieraciumspecieshavenegligiblebenefits.Thelikelyimpactofbiologicalcontrolonhieraciumspeciesisuncertain.Inordertoestimatethebenefitsofbiocontrol,anumberofscenariosaredeveloped.Adecisiontheoryapproachisdescribedwhichassignsprobabilitiestotheoutcomesofeachscenarioanddeterminesafinalnetexpectedbenefitfortheproposedbiocontrolproject.Thisanalysissuggeststhatundertheassumptionsusedabiocontrolprojectwouldrecoveritscostsabout14yearsafterreleaseofcontrolagents.Theproposedprojecthasaninternalrateofreturnof14.7%andyieldsanexpectedannualbenefitof$205,000onceagentsareassumedtobefullyestablished.Theanalyticalframeworkpresentedprovidesausefultoolforfurtheranalysisoftheassumptionsusedandtheissuesinvolvedinbiologicalcontrol.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rosa,Rosa rubiginosa,,sweet brier,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4,non-urban,N,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1990,Year,1990,1991,1990,1991,One-time,650000.00,,,1219422.64,1328876.19,650000.00,1219422.64,1328876.19,USD,1990,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Costs for research project,Phillip Haubrock,No
SC2313,,Greer1990,An Economic Evaluation of the Benefits of Research Into Biological Control of Clematis Vitalba,"Greer, Glen and R.L. Sheppard.","Clematisvitalba,orOldMan'sBeardisaweedwhichisinvadingNewZealand'snativebush.Introducedasagardenspecies,ithasnowspreadintonativebushinmanyareasoftheco~ntryandisregardedasaveryseriousthreattonative'forests.Theplant,adeciduousvine,climbsexistingvegetation,smotheringandeventuallykillingthetreesbelowit.Presentcontrolmeasuresincludechemicalapplicationandhand~cuttingorpulling,buttheweedisstillspreadinginmanyareas.ConsequentlyscientistsareconsideringimplementationofaresearchprogramwiththeaimofidentifyingandintroducingbiologicalagentswhichwouldcontrolClematisvitalba.Aneconomicevaluation,undertakentodeterminewhethersuchresearchisjustified,isthesubjectofthisreport.Thestudycomprisedtwoparts.ThefirstinvolvedtheestimationofthebenefitsofsuchresearchtoNewZealandsociety.Thereisnomarketvalueforscenicresourcessuchasnativebush.Consequentlyanon-marketvaluationtechniqueknownascontingentvaluatiopwasusedtoelicitthecommunity~swillingnesstopayfortheresearch,asaproxyforthebenefitstheyexpecttoreceivefromit.Apostalsurveyof3,000randomlyselectedadultNewZealanderswas.conductedandvalidresponseswerereceivedfrom46percentofthem.Thesecondpartofthestudyconsistedofcollectionandcompilationofdataonexistingcontrolexpen.diturefromlocalauthoritiesandDepartmentofConservationofficers.Threemajorconclusionsemergedfromthestudy.ThefirstwasthatNewZealandersarepreparedtopaysignificantamountsofmoneyforachanceofcontrollingClematisvitalba.Upperandlowerboundestimatesof$111millionand$44millionwereestimated.ThesecondconclusionwasthattheproblemofdamagetonativebushbyClematisvitalbashouldbedealtwithfroman<,tionalperspective.AlthoughtheweedisnotfoundinallregionsofthecountrythestudyfoundthatindividualsfromalloverNewZealandwerepreparedtopaysimilaramountsforresearchintobiologicalcontrol.FinallythestudyconcludesthattheresourcescurrentlydevotedtothecontrolofClematisvitalbaareconsiderablylessthanthevaluetoNewZealandersofpreventingitsfurtherdestructionofnativebush,andthatfundingofresearchintobiologicalcontrolisfullyjustified.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Clematis,Clematis vitalba,,old man's beard,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,1,non-urban,N,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,Te Kuiti Area,Site,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,One-time,1750.00,1500.00,2000.00,3283.06,3577.74,1750.00,3283.06,3577.74,USD,1990,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,pers. Comm of expenditure,Phillip Haubrock,No
105,TC,292,"Eradication campaigns against kiore (Rattus exulans) on Rurima Rocks and Korapuki Island, Northern New Zealand",McFadden and Towns,,1991,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348UnknownneedAccess=true",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rurima Island,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1991,1991,One-time,8485.00,,,8809.51,10232.22,8485.00,8809.51,10232.22,NZD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Net cost total       8485 / Net cost per hectare  1131   / Boat charters 5 @ $300 = 1500  / Gross cost total      9985 / Gross cost per hectare 133
Costs in the Appendix are detailled, and Methods are well explained.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
203,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Mokohinau,Site,1991,Year,1991,Unspecified,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,21621.00,,,28809.41,33134.17,21621.00,28809.41,33134.17,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
205,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Otata,Site,1991,Year,1991,Unspecified,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,8208.00,,,10936.94,12578.76,8208.00,10936.94,12578.76,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
597,TC,556,"The ecological effects of possums on the New Zealand environment. Veterinary Continuing Education, Massey University, publication 132: 73-88",Cowan,,1991,English,Official report,"Cowan, P. E. (1993). Environmental pests: How can we identify the values at risk? New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 20(4), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1993.10420345",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1991,Year,1991,Unspecified,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,550000.00,300000.00,800000.00,571035.05,663255.36,550000.00,571035.05,663255.36,NZD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"""possums alone have caused damage estimated at $300 000-800 000 annually to poplar and willow plantings (Cowan 1991)"" cited in Cowan 1993. Cowan 1991 not found.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
598,TC,556,"The ecological effects of possums on the New Zealand environment. Veterinary Continuing Education, Massey University, publication 132: 73-88",Cowan,,1991,English,Official report,"Cowan, P. E. (1993). Environmental pests: How can we identify the values at risk? New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 20(4), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1993.10420345",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1991,Year,1991,Unspecified,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,37500000.00,35000000.00,40000000.00,38934208.26,45221956.69,37500000.00,38934208.26,45221956.69,NZD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed,NA,Low,,,,,no,"I estimated that possums alone were responsible for damage and resultant expenditure on their management of c. $35-40 million annually, excluding the likely costs of non-tariff trade barriers as a consequence of ongoing bovine Th problems (Cowan 1991)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1552,TC,560,The economic cost of Argentine stem weevil in pastures in New Zealand,Prestidge et al,,1991,English,Conference proceedings,"Goldson, S. L., Rowarth, J. S., & Caradus, J. R. (2005). The impact of invasive invertebrate pests in pastoral agriculture: A review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 48(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2005.9513673",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Listronotus,Listronotus bonariensis,,Argentine Stem Weevil,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1991,Year,1991,Unspecified,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,149500000.00,67000000.00,232000000.00,155217710.27,180284867.35,149500000.00,155217710.27,180284867.35,NZD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Total costs : $78-251 M
- damage to perennial ryegrasses (Lolium perenne) : $46-202 M
- ryegrass staggers : $21-30 M
-> Agriculture = $ 67 - 232 M
- facial exema (health) : 8 - 16M
- bloat (health) : 3M
--> Health = $ 11-19 M",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1553,TC,560,The economic cost of Argentine stem weevil in pastures in New Zealand,Prestidge et al,,1991,English,Conference proceedings,"Goldson, S. L., Rowarth, J. S., & Caradus, J. R. (2005). The impact of invasive invertebrate pests in pastoral agriculture: A review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 48(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2005.9513673",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Listronotus,Listronotus bonariensis,,Argentine Stem Weevil,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1991,Year,1991,Unspecified,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,15000000.00,11000000.00,19000000.00,15573683.30,18088782.68,15000000.00,15573683.30,18088782.68,NZD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Total costs : $78-251 M
- damage to perennial ryegrasses (Lolium perenne) : $46-202 M
- ryegrass staggers : $21-30 M
-> Agriculture = $ 67 - 232 M
- facial exema (health) : 8 - 16M
- bloat (health) : 3M
--> Health = $ 11-19 M",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC941,,Greer1990,An Economic Evaluation of the Benefits of Research Into Biological Control of Clematis Vitalba,"Greer, Glen and R.L. Sheppard.","Clematisvitalba,orOldMan'sBeardisaweedwhichisinvadingNewZealand'snativebush.Introducedasagardenspecies,ithasnowspreadintonativebushinmanyareasoftheco~ntryandisregardedasaveryseriousthreattonative'forests.Theplant,adeciduousvine,climbsexistingvegetation,smotheringandeventuallykillingthetreesbelowit.Presentcontrolmeasuresincludechemicalapplicationandhand~cuttingorpulling,buttheweedisstillspreadinginmanyareas.ConsequentlyscientistsareconsideringimplementationofaresearchprogramwiththeaimofidentifyingandintroducingbiologicalagentswhichwouldcontrolClematisvitalba.Aneconomicevaluation,undertakentodeterminewhethersuchresearchisjustified,isthesubjectofthisreport.Thestudycomprisedtwoparts.ThefirstinvolvedtheestimationofthebenefitsofsuchresearchtoNewZealandsociety.Thereisnomarketvalueforscenicresourcessuchasnativebush.Consequentlyanon-marketvaluationtechniqueknownascontingentvaluatiopwasusedtoelicitthecommunity~swillingnesstopayfortheresearch,asaproxyforthebenefitstheyexpecttoreceivefromit.Apostalsurveyof3,000randomlyselectedadultNewZealanderswas.conductedandvalidresponseswerereceivedfrom46percentofthem.Thesecondpartofthestudyconsistedofcollectionandcompilationofdataonexistingcontrolexpen.diturefromlocalauthoritiesandDepartmentofConservationofficers.Threemajorconclusionsemergedfromthestudy.ThefirstwasthatNewZealandersarepreparedtopaysignificantamountsofmoneyforachanceofcontrollingClematisvitalba.Upperandlowerboundestimatesof$111millionand$44millionwereestimated.ThesecondconclusionwasthattheproblemofdamagetonativebushbyClematisvitalbashouldbedealtwithfroman<,tionalperspective.AlthoughtheweedisnotfoundinallregionsofthecountrythestudyfoundthatindividualsfromalloverNewZealandwerepreparedtopaysimilaramountsforresearchintobiologicalcontrol.FinallythestudyconcludesthattheresourcescurrentlydevotedtothecontrolofClematisvitalbaareconsiderablylessthanthevaluetoNewZealandersofpreventingitsfurtherdestructionofnativebush,andthatfundingofresearchintobiologicalcontrolisfullyjustified.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Clematis,Clematis vitalba,,old man's beard,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,1,non-urban,N,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,NA,Country,1990,Period,1991,1993,1991,1993,One-time,428500.00,,,803880.92,876036.08,142833.33,267960.31,292012.03,USD,1990,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,pers. Comm of expenditure,Phillip Haubrock,No
211,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Red Mercury,Site,1992,Year,1992,Unspecified,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,24126.00,,,32147.25,36973.08,24126.00,32147.25,36973.08,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
216,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha/Rodentia,Leporidae/Muridae,Oryctolagus/Rattus,Oryctolagus cuniculus/Rattus sp.,,European rabbit/Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Stanley,Site,1992,Year,1992,Unspecified,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,17064.00,,,22737.33,26150.57,17064.00,22737.33,26150.57,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
377,TC,445,Offshore Islands co-operative conservation project with ICI crop care division: Phase One (Stanley Island),Towns et al,,1993,English,Official report,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Rodents,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Stanley ,Unit (100 Ha),July 1991-June 1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,One-time,36603.00,,,33562.93,41859.89,36603.00,33562.93,41859.89,NZD,1993,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"36603 in Towns et al 1993
36600 in Holmes (25000 Impl. + 2000 Isol. + 9000 non-targets)
NZD assumed",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
187,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Cuvier,Site,1993,Year,1993,Unspecified,1993,1993,Potentially ongoing,16968.00,,,22609.41,26003.45,16968.00,22609.41,26003.45,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
193,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Cattle,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Enderby,Site,1993,Year,1993,Unspecified,1993,1993,Potentially ongoing,10698.00,,,14254.80,16394.68,10698.00,14254.80,16394.68,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
376,TC,612,Using Brodifacoum to eradicate kiore (Rattus exulans) from Burgess Island and the Knights group of the Mokohinau Islands ,McFadden and Greene,,1994,English,Official report,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Rodents,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Burgess Mokohinau,Unit (100 Ha),1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,30075.00,16110.00,44040.00,27577.11,34394.35,30075.00,27577.11,34394.35,NZD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,[16110 - 44040] (net - gross) ,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
2054,TC,241,Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science,"Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling",,2003,English,Book,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse polyphagous invertebrate defoliators,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,10 years (Unspecified),Period,1993,2003,1993,2003,One-time,40000000.00,,,30949980.76,61299978.25,4000000.00,3094998.08,6129997.83,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,No,"“In the order of $40M has been spent over the last decade in monitoring and eradication programmes for this guild of pests”; full reference: Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science / Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling – [Lincoln, Canterbury] New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc. 2003",Ivan Jaric,Yes
153,TC,323,Feasibility Report on the Native Wildlife Sanctuary Proposal for Karori Reservoir,Karori Reservoir Wildlife Sanctuary Steering Committee,,1994,English,Official report,"Somers, M. J., & Hayward, M. W. (2012). Fencing for conservation: Restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes? Fencing for Conservation: Restriction of Evolutionary Potential Or a Riposte to Threatening Processes?, 142(1), 1–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia/Rodentia,Muridae/Phalangeridae,Mus/Trichosurus,Mus musculus/Trichosurus vulpecula,,House mouse/Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Km),1994,Year,1994,1994,1994,1994,One-time,100000.00,,,165369.93,190413.49,100000.00,165369.93,190413.49,USD,1994,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,Exclusion fence,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
311,TC,158,A strategic approach to eradication of bovine TB from wildlife in New Zealand,Hutchings et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Livingstone, P. G., Hancox, N., Nugent, G., & de Lisle, G. W. (2015). Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 63(0), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2014.971084",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1993-1994,Year,1993,1994,1994,1994,One-time,7300000.00,,,6299062.52,5312059.90,7300000.00,6299062.52,5312059.90,NZD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"In Fig 2, no details on the methods of cost data collection. Possums as vectors of TB. Control costs (fundings)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
374,TC,445,Offshore Islands co-operative conservation project with ICI crop care division: Phase One (Stanley Island),Towns et al,,1993,English,Official report,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Rodents,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Cuvier ,Unit (170 Ha),September 1993-March 1994,Year,1994,1994,1994,1994,One-time,30765.00,,,32474.89,33821.39,30765.00,32474.89,33821.39,NZD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"In Towns et al $30,765.  
Implementation 25000 + Isolation 1000 = 35 000$ in Holmes et al 
NZD assumed",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
375,TC,446,Offshore Islands co-operative conservation project with ICI crop care division: Phase Two (Red Mercury Island),Towns et al,,1993,English,Official report,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Rodents,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Red Mercury,Unit (225 Ha),September 1993-March 1994,Year,1994,1994,1994,1994,One-time,41728.00,,,40915.91,47112.20,41728.00,40915.91,47112.20,NZD,1994,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"41 728$ in Towns et al 1994
Implementation 34000 + Isolation 2000 = 36 000$ in Holmes et al
NZD assumed",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
484,TC,519,South Island high country review,Martin,,1994,English,Official report,"Williams, K. (1995). Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits., 1–299. Retrieved from https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/loginUnknownurl=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspxUnknowndirect=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b2093380&site=eds-live&scope=site",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,"Unit (400,000 Ha)",5 years,Period,1994,1999,1994,1999,One-time,25000000.00,,,30226618.96,47603373.10,5000000.00,6045323.79,9520674.62,AUD,1994,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,Currently the New Zealand Government is spending $25 million over five years to determine how best to manage an area of 400 000 hectares infested with neophobic rabbits (Martin 1994),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2839,WoS,Soliman et al 2017,forecasting the economic impacts of two biofouling invaders on aquaculture production of green-lipped mussels perna canaliculus in new zealand,Soliman T; Inglis GJ,"Resource managers must weigh the
costs of preventing biological invasions against the
harm that may eventuate from inaction. The costs of
intervention are assured, but impacts are typically
uncertain. Quantifying the expected economic im -
pacts of invaders before they occur is a pivotal element
in justifying expenditure on intervention. We
forecast the cumulative economic impacts of 2 invasive
biofouling species (Styela clava and Sabella
spallanzanii) on New Zealand green-lipped mussel
Perna canaliculus aquaculture by combining outputs
from an infestation model and ecosystem energy
budget model with partial budgeting and equilibrium
models. Simulations considered the direct and
combined economic impacts of each species on producers
and on export markets for the shellfish. Direct
impacts on producers were estimated at NZ$23.9
million (Styela clava), $14 million (Sabella spallanzanii)
and $26.4 million (both species combined),
over a 24 yr period. Societal impacts at the market
level were $10.2, $8 and $10.7 million, respectively.
The societal impacts reflect changes in producer and
consumer surplus after adjustment to altered market
prices. Uncertainty boundaries of the estimates were
$7.4?91.9, $2.5?56.7 and $7.4?99.7 million, respectively.
We as sumed that there are few strong alternatives
to the New Zealand product on the world market.
Producers therefore benefit from any increase in
export price by partially shifting production losses
caused by the invaders to foreign consumers. Relaxing
this assumption produced greater societal im -
pacts ($13.3 million). Slowing the spread of the pests,
reducing densities and enhancing the premium market
position of green-lipped mussels could significantly
mitigate the potential impacts.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Ascidiacea,Stolidobranchia,Styelidae,Styela,Styela clava,,Asian tunicate,Aquatic,Aquatic,NA,NA,,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Hauraki Gulf,Site,24 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,1994,2017,One-time,23900000.00,,,16981567.78,16702085.80,995833.33,707565.32,695920.24,NZD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Direct
impacts on producers were estimated at NZ$23.9
million (Styela clava), $14 million (Sabella spallan
zanii)
and $26.4 million (both species combined),
over a 24 yr period. Societal impacts at the market
level were $10.2, $8 and $10.7 million, respectively.",Celine Albert,no
SC2840,WoS,Soliman et al 2017,forecasting the economic impacts of two biofouling invaders on aquaculture production of green-lipped mussels perna canaliculus in new zealand,Soliman T; Inglis GJ,"Resource managers must weigh the
costs of preventing biological invasions against the
harm that may eventuate from inaction. The costs of
intervention are assured, but impacts are typically
uncertain. Quantifying the expected economic im -
pacts of invaders before they occur is a pivotal element
in justifying expenditure on intervention. We
forecast the cumulative economic impacts of 2 invasive
biofouling species (Styela clava and Sabella
spallanzanii) on New Zealand green-lipped mussel
Perna canaliculus aquaculture by combining outputs
from an infestation model and ecosystem energy
budget model with partial budgeting and equilibrium
models. Simulations considered the direct and
combined economic impacts of each species on producers
and on export markets for the shellfish. Direct
impacts on producers were estimated at NZ$23.9
million (Styela clava), $14 million (Sabella spallanzanii)
and $26.4 million (both species combined),
over a 24 yr period. Societal impacts at the market
level were $10.2, $8 and $10.7 million, respectively.
The societal impacts reflect changes in producer and
consumer surplus after adjustment to altered market
prices. Uncertainty boundaries of the estimates were
$7.4?91.9, $2.5?56.7 and $7.4?99.7 million, respectively.
We as sumed that there are few strong alternatives
to the New Zealand product on the world market.
Producers therefore benefit from any increase in
export price by partially shifting production losses
caused by the invaders to foreign consumers. Relaxing
this assumption produced greater societal im -
pacts ($13.3 million). Slowing the spread of the pests,
reducing densities and enhancing the premium market
position of green-lipped mussels could significantly
mitigate the potential impacts.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Annelida,Polychaeta,Sabellida,Sabellidae,Sabella,Sabella spallanzanii,,Feather duster worm,Aquatic,Aquatic,NA,NA,,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Hauraki Gulf,Site,24 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,1994,2017,One-time,14000000.00,,,9947361.88,9783648.59,583333.33,414473.41,407652.02,NZD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Direct
impacts on producers were estimated at NZ$23.9
million (Styela clava), $14 million (Sabella spallan
zanii)
and $26.4 million (both species combined),
over a 24 yr period. Societal impacts at the market
level were $10.2, $8 and $10.7 million, respectively.",Celine Albert,no
SC2841,WoS,Soliman et al 2017,forecasting the economic impacts of two biofouling invaders on aquaculture production of green-lipped mussels perna canaliculus in new zealand,Soliman T; Inglis GJ,"Resource managers must weigh the
costs of preventing biological invasions against the
harm that may eventuate from inaction. The costs of
intervention are assured, but impacts are typically
uncertain. Quantifying the expected economic im -
pacts of invaders before they occur is a pivotal element
in justifying expenditure on intervention. We
forecast the cumulative economic impacts of 2 invasive
biofouling species (Styela clava and Sabella
spallanzanii) on New Zealand green-lipped mussel
Perna canaliculus aquaculture by combining outputs
from an infestation model and ecosystem energy
budget model with partial budgeting and equilibrium
models. Simulations considered the direct and
combined economic impacts of each species on producers
and on export markets for the shellfish. Direct
impacts on producers were estimated at NZ$23.9
million (Styela clava), $14 million (Sabella spallanzanii)
and $26.4 million (both species combined),
over a 24 yr period. Societal impacts at the market
level were $10.2, $8 and $10.7 million, respectively.
The societal impacts reflect changes in producer and
consumer surplus after adjustment to altered market
prices. Uncertainty boundaries of the estimates were
$7.4?91.9, $2.5?56.7 and $7.4?99.7 million, respectively.
We as sumed that there are few strong alternatives
to the New Zealand product on the world market.
Producers therefore benefit from any increase in
export price by partially shifting production losses
caused by the invaders to foreign consumers. Relaxing
this assumption produced greater societal im -
pacts ($13.3 million). Slowing the spread of the pests,
reducing densities and enhancing the premium market
position of green-lipped mussels could significantly
mitigate the potential impacts.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Ascidiacea,Stolidobranchia,Styelidae,Styela,Styela clava,,Asian tunicate,Aquatic,Aquatic,NA,NA,,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Hauraki Gulf,Site,24 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,1994,2017,One-time,10200000.00,,,7247363.65,7128086.83,425000.00,301973.49,297003.62,NZD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Direct
impacts on producers were estimated at NZ$23.9
million (Styela clava), $14 million (Sabella spallan
zanii)
and $26.4 million (both species combined),
over a 24 yr period. Societal impacts at the market
level were $10.2, $8 and $10.7 million, respectively.",Celine Albert,no
SC2842,WoS,Soliman et al 2017,forecasting the economic impacts of two biofouling invaders on aquaculture production of green-lipped mussels perna canaliculus in new zealand,Soliman T; Inglis GJ,"Resource managers must weigh the
costs of preventing biological invasions against the
harm that may eventuate from inaction. The costs of
intervention are assured, but impacts are typically
uncertain. Quantifying the expected economic im -
pacts of invaders before they occur is a pivotal element
in justifying expenditure on intervention. We
forecast the cumulative economic impacts of 2 invasive
biofouling species (Styela clava and Sabella
spallanzanii) on New Zealand green-lipped mussel
Perna canaliculus aquaculture by combining outputs
from an infestation model and ecosystem energy
budget model with partial budgeting and equilibrium
models. Simulations considered the direct and
combined economic impacts of each species on producers
and on export markets for the shellfish. Direct
impacts on producers were estimated at NZ$23.9
million (Styela clava), $14 million (Sabella spallanzanii)
and $26.4 million (both species combined),
over a 24 yr period. Societal impacts at the market
level were $10.2, $8 and $10.7 million, respectively.
The societal impacts reflect changes in producer and
consumer surplus after adjustment to altered market
prices. Uncertainty boundaries of the estimates were
$7.4?91.9, $2.5?56.7 and $7.4?99.7 million, respectively.
We as sumed that there are few strong alternatives
to the New Zealand product on the world market.
Producers therefore benefit from any increase in
export price by partially shifting production losses
caused by the invaders to foreign consumers. Relaxing
this assumption produced greater societal im -
pacts ($13.3 million). Slowing the spread of the pests,
reducing densities and enhancing the premium market
position of green-lipped mussels could significantly
mitigate the potential impacts.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Annelida,Polychaeta,Sabellida,Sabellidae,Sabella,Sabella spallanzanii,,Feather duster worm,Aquatic,Aquatic,NA,NA,,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Hauraki Gulf,Site,24 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,1994,2017,One-time,8000000.00,,,5684206.79,5590656.34,333333.33,236841.95,232944.01,NZD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Direct
impacts on producers were estimated at NZ$23.9
million (Styela clava), $14 million (Sabella spallan
zanii)
and $26.4 million (both species combined),
over a 24 yr period. Societal impacts at the market
level were $10.2, $8 and $10.7 million, respectively.",Celine Albert,no
312,TC,158,A strategic approach to eradication of bovine TB from wildlife in New Zealand,Hutchings et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Livingstone, P. G., Hancox, N., Nugent, G., & de Lisle, G. W. (2015). Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 63(0), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2014.971085",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,14000000.00,,,12080393.88,10187512.14,14000000.00,12080393.88,10187512.14,NZD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"In Fig 2, no details on the methods of cost data collection. Possums as vectors of TB. Control costs (fundings)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
185,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves/Mammalia,Gruiformes/Rodentia,Muridae/Rallidae,Gallirallus/Rattus,Gallirallus australis/Rattus sp.,,Weka/Rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Chetwode,Site,1996,Year,1996,Unspecified,1996,1996,Potentially ongoing,43778.00,,,58333.02,67089.76,43778.00,58333.02,67089.76,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
204,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Mou Waho,Site,1996,Year,1996,Unspecified,1996,1996,Potentially ongoing,8243.00,,,10983.58,12632.39,8243.00,10983.58,12632.39,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
363,GS,299,Beyond Kapiti - a decade of invasive rodent eradications from new zealand islands,Broome,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans/Rattus norvegicus,,Polynesian rat/Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Kapiti Island,"Unit (2,941 Ha)",1996,Year,1996,Unspecified,1996,1996,Potentially ongoing,536000.00,,,612407.63,666681.27,536000.00,612407.63,666681.27,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Includes non- target mitigation & monitoring 
(also converted to 428 200USD 2009)
""Estimated values either used budgeted figures or extrapolated from quantities and approximate unit cost"" but no details of source provided for each calculation = non reproducible",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1291,GS,307,"Invasive alien species: a toolkit of best prevention and management practices
",Wittenberg and Cock,,2001,English,Book,Cock 2003,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Orgyia,Orgyia thyellina,,White-spotted tussock moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1996-1999,Period,1996,1999,1996,1999,One-time,12000000.00,,,6983505.68,11277326.00,3000000.00,1745876.42,2819331.50,NZD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,Cost of eradication program,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1444,GS,134,Insect Eradication and Containment of Invasive Alien Species,Gordh and McKirdy,,2014,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Orgyia,Orgyia leucostigma,,White spotted tussock moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1996-1998,Period,1996,1998,1996,1998,One-time,9000000.00,,,9318712.39,7796802.00,3000000.00,3106237.46,2598934.00,USD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"See ?Table 14.1. Costs and averted economic impacts from eradications of forest insect pests in New Zealand, amounting to a combined net value of averted losses of USD$70 to $700 Million (adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010). Here we present the cost of eradication and the projected potential cost of damage over 20 years if the eradication is not undertaken. 
There are no details on calculations or initial values, or how these values are adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
125,TC,403,Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand,Parkes and Murphy,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Mackenzie Basin,Site,1997-2003,Period,1997,2003,1997,2003,Potentially ongoing,3500000.00,,,2708123.32,3114656.96,500000.00,386874.76,444950.99,NZD,2003,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Parkes, 2003, Unpublished data] The effect of rabbit haemorrhagic disease on rabbits in the Mackenzie Basin has saved farmers about $3.5 million on conventional control costs since 1997 (J. Parkes unpubl. data).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1434,TC,229,Cost-benefit analysis of biosecurity and forest health research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Orgyia,Orgyia thyellina,,white-spotted tussock moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1997,Year,1997,Unspecified,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,10000000.00,,,8601751.11,8609410.89,10000000.00,8601751.11,8609410.89,NZD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"[Horgan, Unknown, Unpublished data] In table 1, Turner et al 2004",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1435,TC,229,Cost-benefit analysis of biosecurity and forest health research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Orgyia,Orgyia thyellina,,white-spotted tussock moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1997,Year,1997,Unspecified,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,97900000.00,,,84211143.42,84286132.62,97900000.00,84211143.42,84286132.62,NZD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"[Horgan, Unknown, Unpublished data] In table 1, Turner et al 2004",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1436,TC,229,Cost-benefit analysis of biosecurity and forest health research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Orgyia,Orgyia thyellina,,white-spotted tussock moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1997,Year,1997,Unspecified,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,34700000.00,,,29848076.37,29874655.79,34700000.00,29848076.37,29874655.79,NZD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"[Horgan, Unknown, Unpublished data] In table 1, Turner et al 2004",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1437,TC,229,Cost-benefit analysis of biosecurity and forest health research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Orgyia,Orgyia thyellina,,white-spotted tussock moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Auckland,Site,1997,Year,1997,Unspecified,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,1500000.00,,,1290262.67,1291411.63,1500000.00,1290262.67,1291411.63,NZD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"[Horgan, Unknown, Unpublished data] In table 1, Turner et al 2004",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
364,GS,299,Beyond Kapiti - a decade of invasive rodent eradications from new zealand islands,Broome,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Whenua Hou (Codfish),Site,1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,500000.00,,,571275.78,621904.17,500000.00,571275.78,621904.17,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Includes non- target mitigation.  
(also converted to 387 400USD 2009)
Details provided for the total area, and how the eradication was done, but not for prices.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1446,GS,134,Insect Eradication and Containment of Invasive Alien Species,Gordh and McKirdy,,2014,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Uraba,Uraba lugens,,Gum leaf skeletoniser,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1997-1998,Year,1997,1998,1998,1998,One-time,1500000.00,,,1553118.73,1299467.00,1500000.00,1553118.73,1299467.00,USD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"See ?Table 14.1. Costs and averted economic impacts from eradications of forest insect pests in New Zealand, amounting to a combined net value of averted losses of USD$70 to $700 Million (adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010). Here we present the cost of eradication and the projected potential cost of damage over 20 years if the eradication is not undertaken. 
There are no details on calculations or initial values, or how these values are adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2535,WoS,Champion2018,Knowledge to action on aquatic invasive species: Island biosecurity the New Zealand and South Pacific story 2018,Champion,"New Zealand and Australia are regarded as world leaders in the field of biosecurity, the management of invasive animals and
plants including aquatic species. This paper presents an overview of the history and current governance of aquatic invasive
species management in New Zealand. Its main focus is the input of biosecurity science, focussing primarily on the proactive
management of invasive freshwater plants, and application in Australasia and other Pacific nations. Examples of proactive
management actions include; identification of invasive species off-shore to prevent importation, management at the border,
mitigation of introduction/dispersal pathways, surveillance for new incursions, incursion response and national eradication
programs. Many of these actions are informed and supported by the development and application of risk assessment tools.
The success of these initiatives within New Zealand is aided by geographical isolation and a relatively small population size,
recognition of the need to protect an economy based on primary production from invasive species, strong effective legislation
and biosecurity science directly linked to policy and management.",2018,English,Conference proceedings,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes camptorhynchus,,southern saltmarsh mosquito,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Aquatic/Terrestrial,,NA,,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,,Country,Since 1998,Period,1998,2010,1998,2010,One-time,70000000.00,,,47279408.69,47961546.65,5384615.38,3636877.59,3689349.74,NZD,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"In June 2010, MPI (Ministry for Primary Industries) declared that the Notifiable
Organism Aedes camptorhynchus had been eradicated,
after its first detection in 1998 (Yard 2011). As this
mosquito is capable of transmitting Ross River virus,
the eradication program was initially run by the
Ministry of Health. In total, eleven populations, all
but one in the North Island, were detected. Eradication
was achieved by aerial and ground-based application
of S-methoprene and Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis.
Additionally, surveillance for mosquito larvae and
adults was carried out to monitor for successful
control and check available habitat. The program
was transitioned to MPI in 2002. The total cost of the
eradication program was approximately NZ$70 M.",Celine Albert/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
403,TC,460,Pest and Weeds. The Cost of Restoring an Indigenous Dawn Chorus,Bertram ,,1999,English,Official report,"Russell, J. C., Innes, J. G., Brown, P. H., & Byrom, A. E. (2015). Predator-free New Zealand: Conservation country. BioScience, 65(5), 520–525. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv012",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1999,Year,1999,Unspecified,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,58320000.00,,,45416391.85,59818664.56,58320000.00,45416391.85,59818664.56,NZD,1999,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"The original paper is not included in the citing paper's reference list  /!\ reference not found in the reference list of citing paper
probably ""Hackwell, K., and Bertram, G. (1999).'Pest and Weeds. The Cost of Restoring an Indigenous Dawn Chorus., (New Zealand Conservation Authority: Wellington.) "" but not found either",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1297,TC,599,The value of the Crop & Food Research BYDV forecast to Canterbury arable farmers,Bicknell and Greer ,,1999,English,Official report,"?Teulon, D. A. J., & Stufkens, M. A. W. (2002). Biosecurity and aphids in New Zealand. New Zealand Plant Protection, 55(2000), 12–17.",No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aphididae,Rhopalosiphum,Rhopalosiphum padi,,Bird cherry-oat aphid ,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Canterbury,Site,1999,Year,1999,Unspecified,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,3700000.00,,,2881355.45,3795079.88,3700000.00,2881355.45,3795079.88,NZD,1999,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,Original reference not found. Estimation of the annual loss due to this aphid and an associated virus.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1449,GS,134,Insect Eradication and Containment of Invasive Alien Species,Gordh and McKirdy,,2014,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Lymantriidae,Teia,Teia anartoides,,Painted Apple Moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1999-2006,Period,1999,2006,1999,2006,One-time,49000000.00,,,50735211.91,42449255.32,6125000.00,6341901.49,5306156.91,USD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"See ?Table 14.1. Costs and averted economic impacts from eradications of forest insect pests in New Zealand, amounting to a combined net value of averted losses of USD$70 to $700 Million (adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010). Here we present the cost of eradication and the projected potential cost of damage over 20 years if the eradication is not undertaken. 
There are no details on calculations or initial values, or how these values are adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
118,TC,245,Development of decision support systems for possum management,Choquenot and Parkes,,2000,English,Book chapter,"Parkes, J., & Murphy, E. (2003). Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518347",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,"Unit (1,700,000 Ha)",2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,6000000.00,,,8540752.03,13016913.62,6000000.00,8540752.03,13016913.62,USD,2000,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"For example, under a benefit-maximization approach with a set annual budget of $6 million, the optimal control strategy to treat all 1.7 million ha of conservation land listed in the New Zealand national possum control plan depends on the frequency of control, the standard of protection desired, and the costs of and constraints on the control methods.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
321,WoS,6614,A novel approach to assess the probability of disease eradication from a wild-animal reservoir host,Anderson et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Diprotodontia,Mustelidae/Phalangeridae,Mustela/Trichosurus,Mustela furo/Trichosurus vulpecula,,European domestic ferret/Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Blythe Valley,Site,2000-2009,Period,2000,2009,2000,2009,One-time,600000.00,,,517731.17,436607.66,60000.00,51773.12,43660.77,NZD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"""Blythe Valley is bTB vector control zone in which NZ$0.6 million was spent on reducing possum and ferret populations from 2000 to 2009"". No reference, but reading the methods we can see it corresponds to their own spendings.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
365,GS,299,Beyond Kapiti - a decade of invasive rodent eradications from new zealand islands,Broome,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans/Rattus norvegicus,,Polynesian rat/Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Tuhua,Site,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,178600.00,,,204059.71,222144.17,178600.00,204059.71,222144.17,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Includes salaries.  
(also converted to 136 500USD 2009)
Details provided for the total area, and how the eradication was done, but not for prices.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1431,TC,155,A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Biosecurity and Forest Health Research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Forest pests,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2000-2040,Period,2000,2040,2000,2040,Potentially ongoing,12011500000.00,3750000000.00,20273000000.00,7767703388.16,11838714391.00,292963414.63,189456180.20,288749131.49,NZD,2000,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Forest pests include insects and pathogenes. Estimated net present losses in commercial forestry and urban forests (with a 10% discount rate = 6,228,000,000.00 as indicated in citing paper). This figure is associated with the status quo scenario; below, results from the biosecurity research scenario can be found",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1432,TC,155,A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Biosecurity and Forest Health Research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Forest pests,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2000-2040,Period,2000,2040,2000,2040,Potentially ongoing,48052000000.00,,,31074693685.89,47360771253.90,1172000000.00,757919358.19,1155140762.29,NZD,2000,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"The estimated net present benefits of the biosecurity research scenario, depending on assumptions about the impact of research (5 056 000 000 for a 10% discount rate). The program costs 3 500 000 annually",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1433,TC,155,A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Biosecurity and Forest Health Research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Forest pests,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2000-2040,Period,2000,2040,2000,2040,Potentially ongoing,5182400000.00,,,3351400411.17,5107851097.69,126400000.00,81741473.44,124581734.09,NZD,2000,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,yes,"The estimated net present benefits of the biosecurity research scenario, depending on assumptions about the impact of research (5 056 000 000 for a 10% discount rate). The program costs 3 500 000 annually",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
2049,TC,241,Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science,"Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling",,2003,English,Book,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse weeds and pests,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,3 years (Unspecified period),Year,2000,2003,2000,2003,One-time,25000000.00,,,19343737.97,38312486.41,25000000.00,19343737.97,38312486.41,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,No,"“over the last three years we in New Zealand have been spending an average of about $25M per year on biosecurity research”; full reference: Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science / Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling – [Lincoln, Canterbury] New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc. 2003",Ivan Jaric,Yes
SC1237,,Wotton2004,Eradication success Down Under: heat treatment of a sunken trawler to kill the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida.,"Wotton, D.M., C. O’Brien, M.D. Stuart and D.J. Fergus.","Eradication of invasive species is difficult in the marine environment, and there have only been a few successes. We report the successful eradication of the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida from a sunken trawler in the Chatham Islands, New Zealand. New heat-treatment methods were developed as the most cost effective and environmentally acceptable option to kill Undaria. Monitoring of the trawler for three years after it sank found no Undaria after the vessel was treated. Key factors in the success of the eradication programme included: early detection, a rapid response, pre-existing knowledge of Undaria, an adaptive management approach, targeting of multiple life history stages, and the cooperation of the vessel's insurer.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,Schaffelke2007,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Laminariales,Alariaceae,Undaria,Undaria pinnatfida,,Wakame,Aquatic,Aquatic,"20 m of water in sandy habitat, about 2.2 km from the nearest rocky reef.",11,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,"Hanson Bay, Chatham Island",Unit (sunken trawler),2000-2003,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,2500000.00,,,1616722.18,2465425.32,2500000.00,1616722.18,2465425.32,NZD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management,Pre-invasion management,High,,,,,no,salvage attempts; insurance comparny for sunken trawler paid for all costs,Jane Catford,No
SC1567,,Wotton2004,Eradication success Down Under: heat treatment of a sunken trawler to kill the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida.,"Wotton, D.M., C. O’Brien, M.D. Stuart and D.J. Fergus.","Eradication of invasive species is difficult in the marine environment, and there have only been a few successes. We report the successful eradication of the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida from a sunken trawler in the Chatham Islands, New Zealand. New heat-treatment methods were developed as the most cost effective and environmentally acceptable option to kill Undaria. Monitoring of the trawler for three years after it sank found no Undaria after the vessel was treated. Key factors in the success of the eradication programme included: early detection, a rapid response, pre-existing knowledge of Undaria, an adaptive management approach, targeting of multiple life history stages, and the cooperation of the vessel's insurer.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,Schaffelke2007,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Laminariales,Alariaceae,Undaria,Undaria pinnatfida,,Wakame,Aquatic,Aquatic,"22 m of water in sandy habitat, about 2.2
km from the nearest rocky reef.",11,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,"Hanson Bay, Chatham Island",Unit (sunken trawler),2000-2003,Year,2000,2003,2000,2003,One-time,16530304.00,,16530304.00,12790314.77,14712620.20,16530304.00,12790314.77,14712620.20,NZD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management,Pre-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"$43,500 for monthly inspections; March 2000 to March 2003, with a final inspection in Dec 2003; insurance comparny for sunken trawler paid for all costs",Jane Catford,No
SC2952,WoS,Paini et al 2016,Global threat to agriculture from invasive species,Paini DR; Sheppard AW; Cook DC; De Barro PJ; Worner SP; Thomas MB,"Invasive species present significant threats to global agriculture,
although how the magnitude and distribution of the threats vary
between countries and regions remains unclear. Here, we present
an analysis of almost 1,300 known invasive insect pests and pathogens,
calculating the total potential cost of these species invading each
of 124 countries of the world, as well as determining which countries
present the greatest threat to the rest of the world given their trading
partners and incumbent pool of invasive species. We find that
countries vary in terms of potential threat from invasive species and
also their role as potential sources, with apparently similar countries
sometimes varying markedly depending on specifics of agricultural
commodities and trade patterns. Overall, the biggest agricultural
producers (China and the United States) could experience the greatest
absolute cost from further species invasions. However, developing
countries, in particular, Sub-Saharan African countries, appear most
vulnerable in relative terms. Furthermore, China and the United States
represent the greatest potential sources of invasive species for the rest
of the world. The analysis reveals considerable scope for ongoing
redistribution of known invasive pests and highlights the need for
international cooperation to slow their spread.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Agriculture,12b,,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,,Country,2000-2009,Period,2000,2009,2000,2009,One-time,639700000.00,,,697090683.59,,63970000.00,69709068.36,,USD,2011,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,Supplementary Material Table S2 Total Invasion Costs,Celine Albert/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
122,TC,404,Management of new deer populations in Northland and Taranaki,Fraser et al,,2003,English,Book,"Parkes, J., & Murphy, E. (2003). Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518346",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Cervus,Cervus sp.,,Deers,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Taranaki,Site,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,102457.00,,,59625.75,96286.75,102457.00,59625.75,96286.75,NZD,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"The campaign to eradicate recently established deer populations is interesting because it is a multi- agency project with an annual budget of $185,000, involving DOC, Northland Regional Council, Agriquality New Zealand, the Animal Health Board, and farmer groups.
  EFFORT (HOURS) AND OPERATING COSTS FOR THE DEER ERADICATION PROGRAMME IN TARANAKI FOR THE 2000/01 YEAR. Staff costs (mostly under planning, inspections, and administration) and overheads are not included in the operating budget figure.
Probably NZD, but this is not clearly specified in the paper",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
127,TC,403,Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand,Parkes and Murphy,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Parkes, J. P., Robley, A., Forsyth, D. M., & Choquenot, D. (2006). Adaptive management experiments in vertebrate pest control in New Zealand and Australia. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[229:AMEIVP]2.0.CO;2",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse (rodents/ferret/possum/stoat/rabbit/deer/birds/pig/goat/cat),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2000-2001,Year,2000,2001,2001,2001,One-time,13760000.00,,,8007753.18,12931333.81,13760000.00,8007753.18,12931333.81,NZD,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Table 4. No calculation, no references given",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
219,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Rodentia,Felidae/Muridae,Felis/Rattus,Felix catus/Rattus sp.,,Cat/Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Tahua,Site,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,67543.00,,,89999.25,103509.61,67543.00,89999.25,103509.61,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
313,TC,158,A strategic approach to eradication of bovine TB from wildlife in New Zealand,Hutchings et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Livingstone, P. G., Hancox, N., Nugent, G., & de Lisle, G. W. (2015). Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 63(0), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2014.971086",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,33000000.00,,,28475214.14,24013421.48,33000000.00,28475214.14,24013421.48,NZD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"In Fig 2, no details on the methods of cost data collection. Possums as vectors of TB. Control costs (fundings)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
366,GS,299,Beyond Kapiti - a decade of invasive rodent eradications from new zealand islands,Broome,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Campbell,Site,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,2520000.00,,,2879229.92,3134397.02,2520000.00,2879229.92,3134397.02,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Includes trial and result monitoring.  
(also converted to 1 868 700USD 2009)
Details provided for the total area, and how the eradication was done, but not for prices.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
727,GS,307,"Invasive alien species: a toolkit of best prevention and management practices
",Wittenberg and Cock,,2001,English,Book,"Bakkes, J., Bolt, K., Braeuer, I., ten Brink, B., Chiabai, A., Ding, H., … Walpole, M. (2008). The Cost of Policy Inaction. The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target. Environment, 0044 (May 2008), 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20616833 --> McNeely, J. A., Mooney, H. A., Neville, L. E., Schei, P. J., & Waage, J. K. (Eds.). (2001). Global Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK: IUCN",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Mesostigmata,Varroidae,Varroa,Varroa destructor,,Varroa mite,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2001,2001,One-time,1300000.00,,,1799635.50,2906144.43,1300000.00,1799635.50,2906144.43,USD,2001,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"""It now appears too late to eradicate the mite, requiring a mitigation plan that is expected to cost $1.3 million in its first stage.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
949,TC,231,Cost-effectiveness of exclusion fencing for stoat and other pest control compared with conventional control,Clapperton and Day,,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Unspecified,Mustelidae/Unspecified,Mustela/Unspecified,Mustela erminea/Unspecified,,Stoat and other pests,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Mainland Island,Unit (Ha),2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,108.00,81.00,135.00,62.85,101.50,108.00,62.85,101.50,NZD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[Saunders, 2015, Personal communication] Cost per hectare per year for pest control species, in Saunders (pers. comm.) : 81 to 135$/ha",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
950,TC,231,Cost-effectiveness of exclusion fencing for stoat and other pest control compared with conventional control,Clapperton and Day,,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Predators,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Trounsen Kauri Park,Unit (Ha),2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,95.00,,,55.29,89.28,95.00,55.29,89.28,NZD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[Leach, 2015, Personal communication] Cost per hectare per year for pest control species, in Leach (pers. comm.)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
951,TC,231,Cost-effectiveness of exclusion fencing for stoat and other pest control compared with conventional control,Clapperton and Day,,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia/Rodentia,Muridae/Phalangeridae,Rattus/Trichosurus,Rattus sp./Trichosurus vulpecula,,Rats/Possums,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Trounsen Kauri Park,Unit (Ha),2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,43.00,,,25.02,40.41,43.00,25.02,40.41,NZD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[Leach, 2015, Personal communication] Cost per hectare per year for pest control species, in Leach (pers. comm.)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
952,TC,231,Cost-effectiveness of exclusion fencing for stoat and other pest control compared with conventional control,Clapperton and Day,,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia/Rodentia,Muridae/Phalangeridae,Rattus/Trichosurus,Rattus sp./Trichosurus vulpecula,,Rats/Possums,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Puketukutuku Peninsula at Lake Waikaremoana,Unit (Ha),2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,49.00,,,28.52,46.05,49.00,28.52,46.05,NZD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[McLennan, 2015, Personal communication] Cost per hectare per year for pest control species, in McLennan (pers. comm.)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
953,TC,231,Cost-effectiveness of exclusion fencing for stoat and other pest control compared with conventional control,Clapperton and Day,,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia/Rodentia,Muridae/Phalangeridae,Rattus/Trichosurus,Rattus sp./Trichosurus vulpecula,,Rats/Possums,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Puketukutuku Peninsula at Lake Waikaremoana,Unit (Ha),2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,26.00,,,15.13,24.43,26.00,15.13,24.43,NZD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[McLennan, 2015, Personal communication] Cost per hectare per year for pest control species, in McLennan (pers. comm.)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
954,TC,231,Cost-effectiveness of exclusion fencing for stoat and other pest control compared with conventional control,Clapperton and Day,,2001,English,Official report,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12346",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Unspecified,Mustelidae/Unspecified,Mustela/Unspecified,Mustela erminea/Unspecified,,Stoat and other pests,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Cape Brett,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,200000.00,,,116391.76,187955.43,200000.00,116391.76,187955.43,NZD,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"high value : ""The electrified fence installed at Cape Brett is 2500 m long. It effectively excludes possums from a peninsula of 1150 ha. It cost just under $200 000 ($75 per metre).""
",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
955,TC,231,Cost-effectiveness of exclusion fencing for stoat and other pest control compared with conventional control,Clapperton and Day,,2001,English,Official report,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12347",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Unspecified,Mustelidae/Unspecified,Mustela/Unspecified,Mustela erminea/Unspecified,,Stoat and other pests,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Cape Brett,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,189500.00,129000.00,250000.00,110281.19,178087.77,189500.00,110281.19,178087.77,NZD,2001,Effective,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no," "" A non-electric fence of the same length, that would exclude all pests, would cost $129 000–$250 000 to install. "" --> mean = 189000",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
956,TC,231,Cost-effectiveness of exclusion fencing for stoat and other pest control compared with conventional control,Clapperton and Day,,2001,English,Official report,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12348",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Unspecified,Mustelidae/Unspecified,Mustela/Unspecified,Mustela erminea/Unspecified,,Stoat and other pests,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Cape Brett,Site,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,3500.00,,,2036.86,3289.22,3500.00,2036.86,3289.22,NZD,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,""" Maintenance costs of $3500 per year (2.7% of initial cost) include power and access by boat as well as repair works (C. McGee, pers. comm.)."" ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
998,WoS,14326,Economic issues related to quarantine in international trade,Mumford,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2000-2001,Year,2000,2001,2001,2001,One-time,44000000.00,,,60910739.83,98361811.61,44000000.00,60910739.83,98361811.61,USD,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, 2000] ""New Zealand had a Biosecurity budget of US$44 million in 2000–2001 ""(Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, 2000) = also not found, not a real reference, but the data is official.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1139,WoS,11817,"Potential economic impact of introduction and spread of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, in Hawaii",Gutrich et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,both,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2001-2007,Period,2001,2007,2001,2007,One-time,9000000.00,,,7819480.21,7068179.50,1285714.29,1117068.60,1009739.93,NZD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[Sarty, 2007, Personal communication] Costs of the national eradication program in NZ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1531,TC,444,NZH 28/11/01,New Zealand Herald,,2001,English,Newspaper,"Jay, M., Morad, M., & Bell, A. (2003). Biosecurity, a policy dilemma for New Zealand. Land Use Policy, 20(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00008-5",No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Lymantriidae,Teia,Teia anartoides,,Painted Apple Moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Auckland,Site,20 years,Period,2001,2021,2001,2021,Potentially ongoing,48000000.00,,,27934022.72,45109304.00,2400000.00,1396701.14,2255465.20,NZD,2001,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"""Estimates by Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry indicate that the moth could cause $48 million of damage to forestry and horticulture over a 20-year period""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
2160,TC,430,Muddied waters: Estimating the national economic cost of soil erosion and sedimentation in New Zealand.,"Krause, M., Eastwood, C., & Alexander, R. R.",,2001,English,Official report,"Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao (2015). Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management. Scion",No,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse wilding IAS conifer trees,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,75800000.00,,,54667112.93,76800343.03,75800000.00,54667112.93,76800343.03,NZD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,yes,"“The on-site erosion cost was estimated to be i$75.8 million per year largely due to agricultural production losses and damages to farm infrastructure, private property, road/rail infrastructure, utility network, and recreational facilities”; full reference: Krause, M., Eastwood, C., & Alexander, R. R. (2001). “”; full reference: Muddied waters: Estimating the national economic cost of soil erosion and sedimentation in New Zealand. Palmerston North: Landcare Research",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2161,TC,430,Muddied waters: Estimating the national economic cost of soil erosion and sedimentation in New Zealand.,"Krause, M., Eastwood, C., & Alexander, R. R.",,2001,English,Official report,"Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao (2015). Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management. Scion",No,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse wilding IAS conifer trees,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,27400000.00,,,19760935.28,27761601.57,27400000.00,19760935.28,27761601.57,NZD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,yes,"“The off-site sedimentation cost was estimated to be i$27.4 million per year due to insured losses from increased flood severity and impacts on consumptive water quality, water storage, power generation, navigation, and water conveyance”; full reference: Krause, M., Eastwood, C., & Alexander, R. R. (2001). Muddied waters: Estimating the national economic cost of soil erosion and sedimentation in New Zealand. Palmerston North: Landcare Research",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2162,TC,430,Muddied waters: Estimating the national economic cost of soil erosion and sedimentation in New Zealand.,"Krause, M., Eastwood, C., & Alexander, R. R.",,2001,English,Official report,"Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao (2015). Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management. Scion",No,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse wilding IAS conifer trees,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,23500000.00,,,16948247.41,23810132.73,23500000.00,16948247.41,23810132.73,NZD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,yes,"“In the total annual economic cost, they also included avoidance/prevention costs of approximately i$23.5 million per year”; full reference: Krause, M., Eastwood, C., & Alexander, R. R. (2001). Muddied waters: Estimating the national economic cost of soil erosion and sedimentation in New Zealand. Palmerston North: Landcare Research",Ivan Jaric,Yes
SC921,,Wotton2004,Eradication success Down Under: heat treatment of a sunken trawler to kill the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida.,"Wotton, D.M., C. O’Brien, M.D. Stuart and D.J. Fergus.","Eradication of invasive species is difficult in the marine environment, and there have only been a few successes. We report the successful eradication of the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida from a sunken trawler in the Chatham Islands, New Zealand. New heat-treatment methods were developed as the most cost effective and environmentally acceptable option to kill Undaria. Monitoring of the trawler for three years after it sank found no Undaria after the vessel was treated. Key factors in the success of the eradication programme included: early detection, a rapid response, pre-existing knowledge of Undaria, an adaptive management approach, targeting of multiple life history stages, and the cooperation of the vessel's insurer.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,Schaffelke2007,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Laminariales,Alariaceae,Undaria,Undaria pinnatfida,,Wakame,Aquatic,Aquatic,"21 m of water in sandy habitat, about 2.2
km from the nearest rocky reef.",11,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,"Hanson Bay, Chatham Island",Unit (sunken trawler),2000-2003,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,380000.00,,,221144.35,356849.57,380000.00,221144.35,356849.57,NZD,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,treatment; insurance comparny for sunken trawler paid for all costs,Jane Catford,No
SC1206,,Bourdot2003,Dairy production revenue losses in New Zealand due to giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris).,"Bourdot, D.W., Saville, D.J., Crone, D.","Giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris L.), a species of European origin, is widespread throughout New Zealand, and is an intractable weed of dairy pastures in parts of the south Auckland, Hawke's Bay, and Taranaki regions and in the districts of Southern Wairarapa, Horowhenua, and Tasman. In this study, the seasonal progression of the weed's ground cover in dairy pastures in the Tasman District was measured during 1989-90 and used, in conjunction with monthly weed-free pasture dry matter production values, to estimate the annual percentage loss in pasture production due to a typical infestation of the weed subjected to typical control measures. Extrapolation to other infested regions and districts provided a national estimate of milk solids revenue loss due to giant buttercup in New Zealand dairy pastures of $156 million in the 2001-02 season.
",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Ranunculus,Ranunculus acris,,giant buttercup,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,pastureland,12b,non-urban,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,South Wairarapa,Site,1 year (2001-2002),Year,2001,2002,2001,2002,One-time,2000000.00,,,1163917.61,1878155.64,2000000.00,1163917.61,1878155.64,NZD,2001,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,annual percentage loss in pasture production (milk solids) due to a typical infestation of the weed,,No
SC1245,,Bourdot2003,Dairy production revenue losses in New Zealand due to giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris).,"Bourdot, D.W., Saville, D.J., Crone, D.","Giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris L.), a species of European origin, is widespread throughout New Zealand, and is an intractable weed of dairy pastures in parts of the south Auckland, Hawke's Bay, and Taranaki regions and in the districts of Southern Wairarapa, Horowhenua, and Tasman. In this study, the seasonal progression of the weed's ground cover in dairy pastures in the Tasman District was measured during 1989-90 and used, in conjunction with monthly weed-free pasture dry matter production values, to estimate the annual percentage loss in pasture production due to a typical infestation of the weed subjected to typical control measures. Extrapolation to other infested regions and districts provided a national estimate of milk solids revenue loss due to giant buttercup in New Zealand dairy pastures of $156 million in the 2001-02 season.
",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Ranunculus,Ranunculus acris,,giant buttercup,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,pastureland,12b,non-urban,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Horowhenua,Site,1 year (2001-2002),Year,2001,2002,2001,2002,One-time,2600000.00,,,1513092.90,2441602.33,2600000.00,1513092.90,2441602.33,NZD,2001,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,annual percentage loss in pasture production (milk solids) due to a typical infestation of the weed,,No
SC1472,,Bourdot2003,Dairy production revenue losses in New Zealand due to giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris).,"Bourdot, D.W., Saville, D.J., Crone, D.","Giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris L.), a species of European origin, is widespread throughout New Zealand, and is an intractable weed of dairy pastures in parts of the south Auckland, Hawke's Bay, and Taranaki regions and in the districts of Southern Wairarapa, Horowhenua, and Tasman. In this study, the seasonal progression of the weed's ground cover in dairy pastures in the Tasman District was measured during 1989-90 and used, in conjunction with monthly weed-free pasture dry matter production values, to estimate the annual percentage loss in pasture production due to a typical infestation of the weed subjected to typical control measures. Extrapolation to other infested regions and districts provided a national estimate of milk solids revenue loss due to giant buttercup in New Zealand dairy pastures of $156 million in the 2001-02 season.
",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Ranunculus,Ranunculus acris,,giant buttercup,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,pastureland,12b,non-urban,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Tasman,Site,1 year (2001-2002),Year,2001,2002,2001,2002,One-time,9500000.00,,,5528608.66,8921239.30,9500000.00,5528608.66,8921239.30,NZD,2001,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,annual percentage loss in pasture production (milk solids) due to a typical infestation of the weed,,No
SC2115,,Bourdot2003,Dairy production revenue losses in New Zealand due to giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris).,"Bourdot, D.W., Saville, D.J., Crone, D.","Giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris L.), a species of European origin, is widespread throughout New Zealand, and is an intractable weed of dairy pastures in parts of the south Auckland, Hawke's Bay, and Taranaki regions and in the districts of Southern Wairarapa, Horowhenua, and Tasman. In this study, the seasonal progression of the weed's ground cover in dairy pastures in the Tasman District was measured during 1989-90 and used, in conjunction with monthly weed-free pasture dry matter production values, to estimate the annual percentage loss in pasture production due to a typical infestation of the weed subjected to typical control measures. Extrapolation to other infested regions and districts provided a national estimate of milk solids revenue loss due to giant buttercup in New Zealand dairy pastures of $156 million in the 2001-02 season.
",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Ranunculus,Ranunculus acris,,giant buttercup,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,pastureland,12b,non-urban,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Hawke's Bay,Site,1 year (2001-2002),Year,2001,2002,2001,2002,One-time,1800000.00,,,1047525.85,1690340.08,1800000.00,1047525.85,1690340.08,NZD,2001,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,annual percentage loss in pasture production (milk solids) due to a typical infestation of the weed,,No
SC2119,,Bourdot2003,Dairy production revenue losses in New Zealand due to giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris).,"Bourdot, D.W., Saville, D.J., Crone, D.","Giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris L.), a species of European origin, is widespread throughout New Zealand, and is an intractable weed of dairy pastures in parts of the south Auckland, Hawke's Bay, and Taranaki regions and in the districts of Southern Wairarapa, Horowhenua, and Tasman. In this study, the seasonal progression of the weed's ground cover in dairy pastures in the Tasman District was measured during 1989-90 and used, in conjunction with monthly weed-free pasture dry matter production values, to estimate the annual percentage loss in pasture production due to a typical infestation of the weed subjected to typical control measures. Extrapolation to other infested regions and districts provided a national estimate of milk solids revenue loss due to giant buttercup in New Zealand dairy pastures of $156 million in the 2001-02 season.
",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Ranunculus,Ranunculus acris,,giant buttercup,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,pastureland,12b,non-urban,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Taranaki,Site,1 year (2001-2002),Year,2001,2002,2001,2002,One-time,111200000.00,,,64713819.30,104425453.69,111200000.00,64713819.30,104425453.69,NZD,2001,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,annual percentage loss in pasture production (milk solids) due to a typical infestation of the weed,,No
SC2129,,Bourdot2003,Dairy production revenue losses in New Zealand due to giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris).,"Bourdot, D.W., Saville, D.J., Crone, D.","Giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris L.), a species of European origin, is widespread throughout New Zealand, and is an intractable weed of dairy pastures in parts of the south Auckland, Hawke's Bay, and Taranaki regions and in the districts of Southern Wairarapa, Horowhenua, and Tasman. In this study, the seasonal progression of the weed's ground cover in dairy pastures in the Tasman District was measured during 1989-90 and used, in conjunction with monthly weed-free pasture dry matter production values, to estimate the annual percentage loss in pasture production due to a typical infestation of the weed subjected to typical control measures. Extrapolation to other infested regions and districts provided a national estimate of milk solids revenue loss due to giant buttercup in New Zealand dairy pastures of $156 million in the 2001-02 season.
",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Ranunculus,Ranunculus acris,,giant buttercup,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,pastureland,12b,non-urban,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,South Auckland,Site,1 year (2001-2002),Year,2001,2002,2001,2002,One-time,29000000.00,,,16876805.39,27233256.81,29000000.00,16876805.39,27233256.81,NZD,2001,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,annual percentage loss in pasture production (milk solids) due to a typical infestation of the weed,,No
SC4771,TC,Gerda,Global eradication and response database,,,2021,English,Database,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Airport,12a,,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Auckland Airport,Unit (< 1 Ha),March 2001-June 2003,Period,2001,2003,2001,2003,One-time,1432000.00,,,1244166.18,1124466.78,477333.33,414722.06,374822.26,NZD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Detection date: 28 February 2001 Detection details: Groundsman was stung by ants when he attempted to flatten a small mound. Delimitation actions: MAF undertook an intensive visual search of the area within a 500 metre radius of the known RIFA site. This was followed by a bait surveillance programme of the same area. High risk sites within a five kilometre zone were also baited. Evidence for outcome: Two years of intensive surveillance was conducted both around the incursion site, and at other risk sites around New Zealand. No further signs of fire ant presence or activity were detected over this time and MAF declared red imported fire ants to be eradicated. This conclusion was supported by MAF's independent invasive ant technical advisory group. Reference: Anonymous 2007. Red imported fire ants - Auckland Airport, 2001. Submissions received to date from parties and organisations for the Convention on Biological Diversity in-depth review on IAS for consideration at COP 9. 27 pp. INVACOSTER COMMENT: exact cost in the anonymous reference page 10.",Elena Angulo,No
SC4772,TC,Anonymous,Red Imported Fire Ants – Auckland Airport 2001,Anonymous,,2001,English,Official report,"Gerda, see cost ID Gerda_5",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,New Zealand,New Zealand,Country,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,229124000.00,,,133340729.61,215129658.41,229124000.00,133340729.61,215129658.41,NZD,2001,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Control/Damage repair/Damage-loss,Mixed,NA,High,,,,,no,"Households impacts in Table 2, page 21 including: Fire ant treatment costs Repair and replacement costs Medical costs; Pet treatment costs; Forgone outdoor household activities",Elena Angulo/Alok Bang,Yes
SC4773,TC,Anonymous,Red Imported Fire Ants – Auckland Airport 2001,Anonymous,,2001,English,Official report,"Gerda, see cost ID Gerda_5",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,New Zealand,New Zealand,Country,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,46227000.00,,,26902209.75,43403566.28,46227000.00,26902209.75,43403566.28,NZD,2001,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Control/Damage repair/Damage-loss,Mixed,NA,High,,,,,no,"Total infrastructure impacts in Table 2, page 21 including: Highways, Electricity, telephone and cable services Public access urban areas; School grounds; Golf courses",Elena Angulo/Alok Bang,Yes
SC4774,TC,Anonymous,Red Imported Fire Ants – Auckland Airport 2001,Anonymous,,2001,English,Official report,"Gerda, see cost ID Gerda_5",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,New Zealand,New Zealand,Country,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,36814000.00,,,21424231.51,34565489.62,36814000.00,21424231.51,34565489.62,NZD,2001,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Control/Damage repair/Damage-loss,Mixed,NA,High,,,,,no,"Table 2, page 21 :Cattle (beef and dairy) production",Elena Angulo/Alok Bang,Yes
SC4775,TC,Anonymous,Red Imported Fire Ants – Auckland Airport 2001,Anonymous,,2001,English,Official report,"Gerda, see cost ID Gerda_5",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,New Zealand,New Zealand,Country,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,5131000.00,,,2986030.64,4817610.89,5131000.00,2986030.64,4817610.89,NZD,2001,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Control/Damage repair/Damage-loss,Mixed,NA,High,,,,,no,"Table 2, page 21 :Grain, arable and horticultural crop production",Elena Angulo/Alok Bang,Yes
SC4776,TC,Anonymous,Red Imported Fire Ants – Auckland Airport 2001,Anonymous,,2001,English,Official report,"Gerda, see cost ID Gerda_5",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,New Zealand,New Zealand,Country,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,179000.00,,,104170.63,168067.11,179000.00,104170.63,168067.11,NZD,2001,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Table 2, page 21 : Nursery crop and turfgrass production",Elena Angulo/Alok Bang,Yes
SC4777,TC,Anonymous,Red Imported Fire Ants – Auckland Airport 2001,Anonymous,,2001,English,Official report,"Gerda, see cost ID Gerda_5",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,New Zealand,New Zealand,Country,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,201000.00,,,116973.72,188723.40,201000.00,116973.72,188723.40,NZD,2001,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Control/Eradication/Prevention,Management,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Table 2, page 21 : Government expenditure",Elena Angulo/Alok Bang,Yes
SC4778,TC,Anonymous,Red Imported Fire Ants – Auckland Airport 2001,Anonymous,,2001,English,Official report,"Gerda, see cost ID Gerda_5",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,New Zealand,New Zealand,Country,2001/02 to 2023/24,Period,2001,2023,2001,2023,One-time,665000000.00,,,387002606.41,624383403.07,28913043.48,16826200.28,27147104.48,NZD,2001,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage_repair/Damage-loss/Eradication/Prevention,Mixed,NA,High,,,,,no,"Figure 1 page 22, legend: The present value of the total impacts over the period 2001/02 to 2023/24 is $665 million. As Figure 2 indicates, over three quarters of these costs are due to household impacts. Of these, over two thirds occur in the Auckland region. Infrastructure impacts and government expenditure are similarly concentrated in the Auckland region and agricultural impacts in the rest of the North Island.",Elena Angulo/Alok Bang,Yes
SC164_BH20,TC,BH_20,Response by email to the request for information by Ben Hoffmann for the InvaCost project,"Chris Green, NZ Department of Conservation.","Tiritiri Matangi Island in the Hauraki Gulf, Auckland, New Zealand is a 220 ha restoration island managed by the Department of Conservation as an open sanctuary. Following eradication of the only mammalian predator, the Pacific rat (Rattus exulans) in 1993, a variety of threatened birds, lizards and a giant invertebrate have been transferred to the island. In March 2000, Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) was discovered and delimiting surveys revealed a 10 ha infestation. Managers were concerned that the ant could have significant negative impacts on invertebrates, birds and lizards. Early surveys confirmed a dramatic decline in all other ant species within the infested area. In February 2001, an eradication programme commenced with paste baits (a.i. 0.01% fipronil) spread manually in a 2 m × 3 m grid over the entire area. The second year employed a 1 m × 3 m spacing. A second incursion part way through the programme extended the area to 11 ha. The same toxic bait was used throughout the programme to kill residual colonies and a non-toxic version was used as a lure to intensively monitor progress. Eradication was declared in 2016. Critical parts of the programme included detection of post treatment survivors and the level of effort required to confirm successful eradication. New treatment techniques were developed to kill the last small nests by placing toxic baits inside vials on the ground to prolong bait life. Such nests exhibited non-invasive behaviour, short foraging distances, and were prone to disturbance leading to foraging cessation. Bait densities and field placement were critical to success. Sites with residual nests were deemed free of Argentine ant once there had been no detections over three consecutive years of ongoing monitoring. With few successful Argentine ant eradications in the world the techniques used here can inform and improve success rates for other ant eradication attempts.",2020,English,Unpublished material,"Green2019_Effort required to confirm eradication of an Argentine ant invasion: Tirititi Matangi Island, New Zealand",No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Flax (Phormium tenax) (foreground) on beach edge as a typical preferred habitat for Argentine ants on Tiritiri Matangi Island,3,,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Tiritirimatangi Island,Site,16y 2001-2016,Period,2001,2016,2001,2016,One-time,420000.00,,,298600.07,297671.12,26250.00,18662.50,18604.44,NZD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,open sanctuary,Ben Hoffman/Elena Angulo,Yes
116,TC,242,Department of Conservation annual report for the year ending 30 June 2002,Department of Conservation ,,2002,English,Official report,"Parkes, J., & Murphy, E. (2003). Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518347",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,NA,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,40000000.00,,,25210018.96,37107067.37,40000000.00,25210018.96,37107067.37,NZD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"The Department manages mammals at an estimated annual cost of c. $40 million, or 23% of its budget in 2001/02 ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
120,TC,242,Department of Conservation annual report for the year ending 30 June 2002,DOC,,2002,English,Official report,"Parkes, J., & Murphy, E. (2003). Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518347",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,NA,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,12024000.00,,,7578131.70,11154384.45,12024000.00,7578131.70,11154384.45,NZD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,The Department currently sustains control of possums over c. 10 650 km2 in over 200 operations at an annual cost of c. $12 million.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
121,TC,242,Department of Conservation annual report for the year ending 30 June 2002,DOC,,2002,English,Official report,"Parkes, J., & Murphy, E. (2003). Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518346",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,NA,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,6306000.00,,,3974359.49,5849929.17,6306000.00,3974359.49,5849929.17,NZD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Table in DOC, no details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
123,TC,188,Annual report 2001/02. Animal Health Board,Animal Health Board,,2002,English,Official report,"Parkes, J., & Murphy, E. (2003). Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518347",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Diprotodontia,Mustelidae/Phalangeridae,Mustela/Trichosurus,Mustela furo/Trichosurus vulpecula,,European domestic ferret/Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2001-2002,Year,2001,2002,2002,2002,One-time,54000000.00,,,34033525.59,50094540.95,54000000.00,34033525.59,50094540.95,NZD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management,Knowledge/funding,Low,,,,,no,"The Animal Health Board funded $54 million ofvector control in 2001/02, with funding from theCrown (38%), levies on producers (55%), and regional council ratepayers (6%). 
Most of the work targets possums and ferrets, but includes some populations of feral pigs and deer.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
141,TC,501,Review of feral cat eradications on islands. Island Invasives: Eradication and Management,Campbell et al,,2011,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Rodentia,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Cats/Rodents,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Raoul,Site,2002-2005,Period,2002,2005,2002,2005,One-time,832000.00,,,950602.90,1034848.54,208000.00,237650.72,258712.14,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"[Harper, Personal communication] Cost of successful insular cat eradication campaigns. Costs converted by Campbell et al 2011.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
362,GS,299,Beyond Kapiti - a decade of invasive rodent eradications from new zealand islands,Broome,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans/Rattus norvegicus,,Polynesian rat/Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Raoul,"Unit (2,941 Ha)",2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,866000.00,,,989449.65,1077138.02,866000.00,989449.65,1077138.02,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"total cost 1 199 000 NZ$ 1996 (Bait cost : 210 000 NZ$ , Aircraft cost : 376 000 NZ$; Other costs : 613 000 NZ$) --> converted to US$2009 = 866 000 USD.  Eradication end date 2002  
not the same value in Homes et al : Implementation 719 000 USD. ""We used raw costs reported in Broome (2009). Also included cat eradication. Considered an overestimate as includes shipping (isolation) costs, plus additional costs to remove remaining animals that did not succumb to secondary poisoning""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
370,TC,572,"The eradication of Norway rats, kiore and feral cats from Tuhua (Mayor Island)",Williams and Jones,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Rodents,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Tuhua,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2002,2002,One-time,105000.00,,,149463.16,227795.99,105000.00,149463.16,227795.99,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Implementation 99000 + Isolation 6000.  Eradication end date 2000,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1000,TC,252,"Ecological and Economic Costs of Alien Vertebrates in New Zealand. In D. Pimentel, ed., Biological Invasions: Economics and Environmental Costs of Alien Plant, Animal, and Microbe Species. ",Clout,,2002,English,Book chapter,"Olson, L. (2006). The Economics of Terrestrial Invasive Species: A Review of the Literature. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 35(1), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500010145",No,Animalia,Chordata,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Vertebrates,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,270000000.00,,,170167627.97,250472704.77,270000000.00,170167627.97,250472704.77,NZD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,Low,,,,,no,Annual Economic Impact of Terrestrial Invasive Species on a National Scale (review from olson 2006),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1001,TC,170,"Alien Invertebrates in New Zealand. In D. Pimentel, ed., Biological Invasions: Economics and Environmental Costs of Alien Plant, Animal, and Microbe Species. Boca Raton: CRC Press",Barlow and Goldson,,2002,English,Book chapter,"Olson, L. (2006). The Economics of Terrestrial Invasive Species: A Review of the Literature. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 35(1), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500010145",No,Animalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Invertebrates,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,2000000000.00,,,1260500947.96,1855353368.63,2000000000.00,1260500947.96,1855353368.63,NZD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,Low,,,,,no,Annual Economic Impact of Terrestrial Invasive Species on a National Scale (review from olson 2006),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1290,TC,432,"NASONOVIA RIBIS-NIGRI, A NEW APHID PEST FOUND ON LETTUCES (LACTUCA SATIVA) AND RIBES SPP. IN CANTERBURY",Stufkens et al,,2002,English,Conference proceedings,In Teulon and Stufkens 2002,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aphididae,Nasonovia,Nasonovia ribisnigri,,Lettuce Aphid,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,200000.00,,,126050.09,185535.34,200000.00,126050.09,185535.34,NZD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,Probably damage costs,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1301,TC,213,Case Study 3 - Response to the Incursion of the Painted Apple Moth,Controller and Auditor-General of New Zealand ,,2002,English,Official report,Armstrong and Ball 2005,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Lymantriidae,Teia,Teia anartoides,,Painted apple moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2002-2022,Period,2002,2022,2002,2022,Potentially ongoing,197590909.09,55363636.36,339818181.82,124531764.11,183300479.40,9409090.91,5930084.01,8728594.26,NZD,2002,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Predictive estimation for 2002-2022 if the species is not managed or eradicated. Damage costs to native species not estimated. Assumed to be in NZ $.
No ref but made by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry => Reliable Unknown",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1465,TC,301,Eradication of introduced Bactrocera species (Dipera: Tephritidae) in Nauru using make annihilation and protein bait application techniques,Allwood et al,,2002,English,Book chapter,"Reaser, J. K., Meerson, L. a., Cronk, Q., & Poorter, M. D. (2007). Ecological and socioeconomic impacts of invasive alien species in island ecosystems. Environmental Conservation, 34(June), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892907003817",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Ceratitis,Ceratitis capitata,,Mediterranean fruit fly,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,6000000.00,,,3781502.84,5566060.11,6000000.00,3781502.84,5566060.11,NZD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"""Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann)) was recorded in New Zealand in 1996 and was successfully eradicated at a cost of approximately NZ$6 million."" No reference",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1532,TC,151,$90m last-ditch attempt to wipe out moth,New Zealand Herald,,2002,English,Newspaper,"Jay, M., Morad, M., & Bell, A. (2003). Biosecurity, a policy dilemma for New Zealand. Land Use Policy, 20(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00008-5",No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Lymantriidae,Teia,Teia anartoides,,Painted Apple Moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,20 years,Period,2002,2022,2002,2022,Potentially ongoing,207000000.00,58000000.00,356000000.00,130461848.11,192029073.65,10350000.00,6523092.41,9601453.68,NZD,2002,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"""The Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries recently raised the estimate of damage from the moth should it become established to between $58 and $356 million over the same 20-year period,..""
The citation is not verified (PDF not found)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1533,TC,151,$90m last-ditch attempt to wipe out moth,New Zealand Herald,,2002,English,Newspaper,"Jay, M., Morad, M., & Bell, A. (2003). Biosecurity, a policy dilemma for New Zealand. Land Use Policy, 20(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00008-5",No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Lymantriidae,Teia,Teia anartoides,,Painted Apple Moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,90000000.00,,,56722542.66,83490901.59,90000000.00,56722542.66,83490901.59,NZD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"Fundings for eradication. "".... and received Cabinet approval for $90 million for a pest eradication campaign (NZH 10/9/2002)""
The citation is not verified (PDF not found)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1551,WoS,12947,The impact of invasive invertebrate pests in pastoral agriculture: A review,Goldson et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Lymantriidae,Teia,Teia anartoides,,Painted Apple Moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Auckland,Site,3 years,Period,2002,2005,2002,2005,One-time,90000000.00,,,79536199.79,73591630.88,30000000.00,26512066.60,24530543.63,NZD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[Sherwin, 2004, Personal communication] Cost of eradication of the Painted apple moth in Auckland
""Projected expenditure on this programme, which sought to protect New Zealand's forestry industry (worth $3.32 billion to the export economy in 2004; Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2005) was estimated to be between $50 and $100 million; the amount committed to the programme was $90 mil- lion over 3 years (M. Sherwin pers. comm. 2004)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1799,TC,234,Dairy production revenue losses in New Zealand due to giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris),"G. W. Bourdôt , D. J. Saville & D. Crone",,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Ranunculus,Ranunculus acris,,Giant buttercup,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1 year (2001-2002),Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,156000000.00,,,120704924.96,239069915.19,156000000.00,120704924.96,239069915.19,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,No,“National estimate of milk solids revenue loss due to giant buttercup in New Zealand dairy pastures of $156 million in the 2001-02 season”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
101,WoS,13836,From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands,Towns and Broome,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Mercury Island,Unit (Ha),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,366.00,,,283.19,325.70,366.00,283.19,325.70,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"/!\ in early phases of the campaigns only
The costs of aerial spread operations reached $366/ha in the early phases of the Mercury Islands campaigns",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
102,WoS,13836,From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands,Towns and Broome,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Tuhua,Unit (Ha),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,114.00,,,88.21,101.45,114.00,88.21,101.45,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[Williams and Jones, 2003, Personnal communication] The costs of aerial spread operations: $ 114/ha by the Tuhua Island campaign, involving cats and two species of rats.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
106,WoS,13836,From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands,Towns and Broome,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans/Rattus norvegicus,,Polynesian rat/Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Kapiti Island,Site,25 days,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2003,2003,One-time,500000.00,,,386874.76,444950.99,500000.00,386874.76,444950.99,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[Empson, 2003, Personal communication] Cost of eradication campaign excluding DOC staff time",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
107,WoS,13836,From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands,Towns and Broome,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans/Rattus norvegicus,,Polynesian rat/Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Tuhua,Site,10 days,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2003,2003,One-time,146000.00,,,112967.43,129925.69,146000.00,112967.43,129925.69,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[Williams, 2003, Personal communication] Cost of eradication campaign excluding staff time",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
119,TC,627,"When can human predation drive vertebrate pests to extinction? A case study of feral goats (Capra hircus) in Egmont National Park, New Zealand",Forsyth et al,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Parkes, J., & Murphy, E. (2003). Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518346",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,"Egmont National Park (33,000 Ha)",Unit (Park),2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,25000000.00,,,19343737.97,22247549.74,25000000.00,19343737.97,22247549.74,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"The feral goat control operation in the 33 000-ha Egmont National Park is the longest sus-tained control of a wild mammal (other than a commensal pest) in the world, with an annual effort beginning in 1924 at a total cost in today’s dollars of perhaps $25 million for about 100 000 goats. NZD assumed",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
124,TC,403,Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand,Parkes and Murphy,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Parkes, J. P., Robley, A., Forsyth, D. M., & Choquenot, D. (2006). Adaptive management experiments in vertebrate pest control in New Zealand and Australia. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[229:AMEIVP]2.0.CO;2",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse (possum/rabbit/deer/goat/mustelids/dama wallaby/cats/rats/hare/feral cattle/Bennett's wallaby/chinchilla/cigs/Bengal cats),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,16200000.00,,,12534742.21,14416412.23,16200000.00,12534742.21,14416412.23,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"No calculation, no references. "" Table 3 Summary of mammal species that meet the Regional Pest Management Strategy (RPMS) requirements, those actually controlled, and those noted but that do not meet the RPMS requirements by regional and district councils and an estimated annual cost of mammal control, Most costs are taken from the 2001/02 year and do not include funding to councils from the Animal Health Board for Tb vector control""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
126,TC,403,Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand,Parkes and Murphy,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Mustela,Mustela erminea,,Stoat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,2000000.00,,,1547499.04,1779803.98,2000000.00,1547499.04,1779803.98,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,The Department has created five kiwi sanctuaries covering c. 40 000 ha where it conducts intensive predator control at an annual cost of c. $2 million funded out of the New Zealand Biodiversity Strategy and with sponsorship from the Bank of New Zealand.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
184,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus sp.,,Rats,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Campbell,Site,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,1249726.00,,,1665226.64,1915204.42,1249726.00,1665226.64,1915204.42,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
315,TC,602,Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand,Livingstone et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Tait, P., Saunders, C., Nugent, G., & Rutherford, P. (2017). Valuing conservation benefits of disease control in wildlife: A choice experiment approach to bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand’s native forests. Journal of Environmental Management, 189, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.045 (id 941)",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,50000000.00,,,38687475.95,44495099.47,50000000.00,38687475.95,44495099.47,NZD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Although formal approval of this amendment was delayed until 2004 (to enable resolution of funding share issues) increased vector control funding to more than $50 million per year became available from industry and central and regional government from 2002/03, enabling the main vector control components of the strategy to be introduced.  /!\ may come from Hutchings et al. 2013. Possums as vectors of TB.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
701,TC,504,Review of Varroa economic impact assessment: Recommendations on revision,Anonymous,,2003,English,Official report,"Howlett, B. G., & Donovan, B. J. (2010). A review of New Zealand’s deliberately introduced bee fauna: Current status and potential impacts. New Zealand Entomologist, 33(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779962.2010.9722196",No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Mesostigmata,Varroidae,Varroa,Varroa destructor,,Varroa mite,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2003-2028,Period,2003,2028,2003,2028,Potentially ongoing,19730769.23,14038461.53,25423076.92,15266673.20,17558450.79,758875.74,587179.74,675325.03,NZD,2003,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"[cited 8 Mar 2007]. 10 pp. Available from: http://www. biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests-diseases/animals/ varroa/assessment-review.pdf. ""The establishment of the varroa mite in New Zealand in 2000 (Zhang 2000) is predicted to have an economic impact of $365 - $661 million between the period 2003 to 2028 (Anon. 2002)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
702,TC,537,Summary of Assessments of the economic impact of Varroa in the South Island of New Zealand,Simpson,,2003,English,Official report,Howlett B Donovan B 2010 A review of New Zealand's deliberately introduced bee fauna: Current status and potential impacts (ID 10096),No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Mesostigmata,Varroidae,Varroa,Varroa destructor,,Varroa mite,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,South Island,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,315500000.00,198000000.00,433000000.00,244117973.24,280764077.66,315500000.00,244117973.24,280764077.66,NZD,2003,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"""and between $198 and $433 million dollars in the South Island alone (Simpson 2003)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1197,TC,504,Review of Varroa economic impact assessment: Recommendations on revision,Anonymous,,2003,English,Official report,"Howlett, B. G., & Donovan, B. J. (2010). A review of New Zealand’s deliberately introduced bee fauna: Current status and potential impacts. New Zealand Entomologist, 33(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779962.2010.9722196",No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Mesostigmata,Varroidae,Varroa,Varroa destructor,,Varroa mite,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2003-2028 ,Period,2003,2028,2003,2028,Potentially ongoing,513000000.00,365000000.00,661000000.00,396933503.24,456519720.56,19730769.23,15266673.20,17558450.79,NZD,2003,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"[cited 8 Mar 2007]. 10 pp. Available from: http://www. biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests-diseases/animals/ varroa/assessment-review.pdf. ""The establishment of the varroa mite in New Zealand in 2000 (Zhang 2000) is predicted to have an economic impact of $365 - $661 million between the period 2003 to 2028 (Anon. 2002)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1448,GS,134,Insect Eradication and Containment of Invasive Alien Species,Gordh and McKirdy,,2014,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Uraba,Uraba lugens,,Gum leaf skeletoniser,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,90000000.00,,,119922604.76,137924951.07,90000000.00,119922604.76,137924951.07,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"See ?Table 14.1. Costs and averted economic impacts from eradications of forest insect pests in New Zealand, amounting to a combined net value of averted losses of USD$70 to $700 Million (adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010). Here we present the cost of eradication and the projected potential cost of damage over 20 years if the eradication is not undertaken. 
There are no details on calculations or initial values, or how these values are adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1451,GS,134,Insect Eradication and Containment of Invasive Alien Species,Gordh and McKirdy,,2014,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Hyphantria,Hyphantria cunea,,Fall Webworm,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2003-2006,Period,2003,2006,2003,2006,One-time,5000000.00,,,5177062.44,4331556.67,1250000.00,1294265.61,1082889.17,USD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"See ?Table 14.1. Costs and averted economic impacts from eradications of forest insect pests in New Zealand, amounting to a combined net value of averted losses of USD$70 to $700 Million (adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010). Here we present the cost of eradication and the projected potential cost of damage over 20 years if the eradication is not undertaken. 
There are no details on calculations or initial values, or how these values are adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1453,GS,134,Insect Eradication and Containment of Invasive Alien Species,Gordh and McKirdy,,2014,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy Moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2003-2005,Period,2003,2005,2003,2005,One-time,5000000.00,,,5177062.44,4331556.67,1666666.67,1725687.48,1443852.22,USD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"See ?Table 14.1. Costs and averted economic impacts from eradications of forest insect pests in New Zealand, amounting to a combined net value of averted losses of USD$70 to $700 Million (adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010). Here we present the cost of eradication and the projected potential cost of damage over 20 years if the eradication is not undertaken. 
There are no details on calculations or initial values, or how these values are adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
2048,TC,241,Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science,"Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling",,2003,English,Book,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse weeds and pests,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,800000000.00,,,618999615.19,1225999565.06,800000000.00,618999615.19,1225999565.06,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,No,"“New Zealand has a long history of dealing with a wide range of exotic pests, such as rabbits and gorse, and around $800M is spent each year on weed and pest control”; Full reference: Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science / Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling – [Lincoln, Canterbury] New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc. 2003",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2050,TC,241,Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science,"Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling",,2003,English,Book,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse aquatic weeds,Aquatic,Aquatic,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,960000.00,,,742799.54,1471199.48,960000.00,742799.54,1471199.48,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,No,"“The Foundation currently (2002/03) invests an estimated $13.69M in biosecurity research (for the area excluding marine and vertebrate biosecurity). The overall total ($13.69M) can be divided roughly into the following topics”; full reference: Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science / Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling – [Lincoln, Canterbury] New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc. 2003",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2051,TC,241,Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science,"Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling",,2003,English,Book,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse terrestial weeds,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,2870000.00,,,2220661.12,4398273.44,2870000.00,2220661.12,4398273.44,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,No,"“The Foundation currently (2002/03) invests an estimated $13.69M in biosecurity research (for the area excluding marine and vertebrate biosecurity). The overall total ($13.69M) can be divided roughly into the following topics”; full reference: Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science / Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling – [Lincoln, Canterbury] New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc. 2004",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2052,TC,241,Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science,"Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling",,2003,English,Book,NA,Yes,Animalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse Macro invertebrates,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,3010000.00,,,2328986.05,4612823.36,3010000.00,2328986.05,4612823.36,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,No,"“The Foundation currently (2002/03) invests an estimated $13.69M in biosecurity research (for the area excluding marine and vertebrate biosecurity). The overall total ($13.69M) can be divided roughly into the following topics”; full reference: Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science / Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling – [Lincoln, Canterbury] New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc. 2005",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2053,TC,241,Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science,"Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling",,2003,English,Book,NA,Yes,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse (Micro-organisms and invertebrates),Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,6850000.00,,,5300184.21,10497621.28,6850000.00,5300184.21,10497621.28,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,No,"“The Foundation currently (2002/03) invests an estimated $13.69M in biosecurity research (for the area excluding marine and vertebrate biosecurity). The overall total ($13.69M) can be divided roughly into the following topics”; full reference: Defending the Green Oasis: New Zealand Biosecurity and Science / Editors, S.L. Goldson and D.M. Suckling – [Lincoln, Canterbury] New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc. 2006",Ivan Jaric,Yes
SC1896,,Tomasetto2017,Intensified agriculture favors evolved resistance to biological control,"Tomasetto, F., Tylianakis, J.M., Reale, M., Wratten, S., Goldson, S.L.","Increased regulation of chemical pesticides and rapid evolution of
pesticide resistance have increased calls for sustainable pest
management. Biological control offers sustainable pest suppression,
partly because evolution of resistance to predators and
parasitoids is prevented by several factors (e.g., spatial or temporal
refuges from attacks, reciprocal evolution by control agents,
and contrasting selection pressures from other enemy species).
However, evolution of resistance may become more probable as
agricultural intensification reduces the availability of refuges and
diversity of enemy species, or if control agents have genetic
barriers to evolution. Here we use 21 y of field data from 196 sites
across New Zealand to show that parasitism of a key pasture pest
(Listronotus bonariensis; Argentine stem weevil) by an introduced
parasitoid (Microctonus hyperodae) was initially nationally successful
but then declined by 44% (leading to pasture damage of
c. 160 million New Zealand dollars per annum). This decline was
not attributable to parasitoid numbers released, elevation, or local
climatic variables at sample locations. Rather, in all locations the
decline began 7 y (14 host generations) following parasitoid introduction,
despite releases being staggered across locations in
different years. Finally, we demonstrate experimentally that declining
parasitism rates occurred in ryegrass Lolium perenne,
which is grown nationwide in high-intensity was significantly less
than in adjacent plots of a less-common pasture grass (Lolium
multiflorum), indicating that resistance to parasitism is host
plant–dependent. We conclude that low plant and enemy biodiversity
in intensive large-scale agriculture may facilitate the evolution
of host resistance by pests and threaten the long-term
viability of biological control.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Listronotus,Listronotus bonariensis,,Argentine stem weevil,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,2003-2015,Period,2003,2015,2003,2015,Potentially ongoing,160000000.00,,,113684135.73,108783965.24,12307692.31,8744933.52,8367997.33,NZD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Here we use 21 y of field data from 196 sites
across New Zealand to show that parasitism of a key pasture pest
(Listronotus bonariensis; Argentine stem weevil) by an introduced
parasitoid (Microctonus hyperodae) was initially nationally successful
but then declined by 44% (leading to pasture damage of
c. 160 million New Zealand dollars per annum). The exact point of this specific decline was unclear in the study, however I used the second breakpoint (12 years, Figure 1) after the introduction of the parasitoid in 1991, as this corroborated ~44%.",Ross Cuthbert,No
SC2632,TC,Salamolard2008,Mise en place d'un dispositif permanent de veille et d'intervention pour la prévention des invasions biologiques à la Réunion,Salamolard et al,,2008,French,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,forestiers,1,,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Auckland,Country,2003-2005,Period,2003,2005,2003,2005,One-time,5400000.00,,,5156814.06,,1800000.00,1718938.02,,AUD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Le ministère néo-zelandais de l'Agriculture et de la Forêt (MAF) a mis en place un programme de surveillance du bombyx disparate depuis 1993. Un bombyx capturé en mars 2003 à Hamilton (sud d'Auckland) a déclenché un programme d'éradication ayant coûté 5.4 millions de dollars sur deux années de traitement (2003-2005),Celine Albert/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
74,TC,227,Cost effective feral animal exclusion fencing for areas of high conservation value in Australia - Part 2: Catalogue of fence designs,Long and Robley,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae/Suidae,Capra/Sus,Capra hircus/Sus scrofa,,Feral pig/Feral goat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,3150.00,3100.00,3200.00,3006.32,4091.49,3150.00,3006.32,4091.49,AUD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of the fence material. 
Fence 2: Feral Pigs & Goats. $3,100/km (using 8/90/30), $3,200/km (using 8/90/15)
all material described + cost detailled at the end of the document",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
85,TC,227,Cost effective feral animal exclusion fencing for areas of high conservation value in Australia - Part 2: Catalogue of fence designs,Long and Robley,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla/Carnivora/Lagomorpha,Bovidae/Canidae/Felidae/Leporidae/Suidae,Capra/Felis/Oryctolagus/Sus/Vulpes,Capra hircus/Felis catus/Oryctolagus cuniculus/Sus scrofa/Vulpes vulpes,,Feral goat/Feral cat/Common rabbit/Feral pig/European red fox,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Karori Wildlife Sanctuary/Rapanui Point and Omaha Beach,Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,50000.00,,,47719.35,64944.28,50000.00,47719.35,64944.28,AUD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of the fence material. 
Designed to exclude all feral mammals (in N.Z.) including rabbits, cats, goats, pigs, mustelids, possums, and rodents",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
111,WoS,13591,"Comparing Cost-Effectiveness of Commercial Harvesting, State-Funded Culling, and Recreational Deer Hunting in New Zealand",Nugent and Choquenot,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Cervus,Cervus sp.,,Deers,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,43221.00,,,37177.63,37210.73,43221.00,37177.63,37210.73,NZD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Harvesting,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"These are input parameters for a bioeconomic model. Methodology used to collect this data is not provided.
Helicopter-based => venison recovery : value of each harvested deer 150; cost of travel to the hunting area 2; cost of each unit of time 180
Helicopter-based => Killing to waste : value of each harvested deer 0; cost of travel to the hunting area 1.5; cost of each unit of time 250
Ground-based => Recreational hunting : value of each harvested deer 700; cost of travel to the hunting area 2; cost of each unit of time 10
Ground-based => Killing to waste : value of each harvested deer 0; cost of travel to the hunting area 2; cost of each unit of time 10",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
112,WoS,13591,"Comparing Cost-Effectiveness of Commercial Harvesting, State-Funded Culling, and Recreational Deer Hunting in New Zealand",Nugent and Choquenot,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Cervus,Cervus sp.,,Deers,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Hour),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,130.00,10.00,250.00,111.82,111.92,130.00,111.82,111.92,NZD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Harvesting,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"These are input parameters for a bioeconomic model. Methodology used to collect this data is not provided.
Helicopter-based => venison recovery : value of each harvested deer 150; cost of travel to the hunting area 2; cost of each unit of time 180
Helicopter-based => Killing to waste : value of each harvested deer 0; cost of travel to the hunting area 1.5; cost of each unit of time 250
Ground-based => Recreational hunting : value of each harvested deer 700; cost of travel to the hunting area 2; cost of each unit of time 10
Ground-based => Killing to waste : value of each harvested deer 0; cost of travel to the hunting area 2; cost of each unit of time 10",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1438,TC,229,Cost-benefit analysis of biosecurity and forest health research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Lymantriidae,Teia,Teia anartoides,,Painted apple moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2004,2004,One-time,100000000.00,,,86017511.15,86094108.91,100000000.00,86017511.15,86094108.91,NZD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry , 2004, Personal communication] In table 1, Turner et al 2004",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1442,TC,229,Cost-benefit analysis of biosecurity and forest health research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,290500000.00,,,249880869.89,250103386.38,290500000.00,249880869.89,250103386.38,NZD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Forest Health Advisory Committee , 1997] In table 1, Turner et al 2004",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC1310,,Hewitt2004a,Marine biosecurity gets increased funding,"Hewitt, C.L. and A. Bauckham.","Our marine environment is of
significant value for New Zealand.
Economically, New Zealand fisheries
and aquaculture industries represent a
large portion of GDP, and this country
produces more than one percent of the
world’s total fisheries catch.
Environmentally, New Zealand
represents a hotspot for biodiversity.
New Zealand’s 120-million-year
geographic isolation from other
landmasses has resulted in a diverse
range of species endemic to New
Zealand (for example in 30 percent
of algae to over 95 percent of
sponges found).
New Zealanders, particularly Maori, also
have a strong sense of connection with
the marine environment. The value of
the marine environment to Maori is
holistic, based on spiritual and
traditional aspects of Maori culture.
Although putting a dollar value on
recreational and social use of the marine
environment is difficult, tourism
comprises about 9 percent of GDP and
is increasing annually.
World-class biosecurity system
As a discipline, marine biosecurity is in
its infancy. However, New Zealand’s
biosecurity system is acclaimed as world
class. At a recent Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation (APEC) meeting, the
marine component was identified as an
example for other nations.
In 1997, marine biosecurity functions
were transferred from the Ministry of
Agriculture and Forestry to the Ministry
of Fisheries. Subsequently, in 1999, as
part of the Government’s Biodiversity
Package, the development of a
comprehensive marine biosecurity
programme started. There was an
urgent need to manage one key threat
(ballast water), and simultaneously
identify the needs and appropriate
resources for establishing an appropriate
scale of biosecurity delivery. This
included developing a baseline
understanding of the current extent of
introductions in New Zealand’s
international ports (see Biosecurity
39:17).
Enhanced capability for
marine biosecurity
Marine biosecurity was recognised in
the Biosecurity Strategy as one key
component for enhanced capability in
the current biosecurity system, with
three expectations explicitly relating to
marine capability. Two specific
enhancements will occur to achieve this:
• Firstly, in this year’s budget, marine
biosecurity capability enhancement
was identified as a high priority, and
received additional funding of $3.9
million per annum. The focus of this
new money will largely be on preclearance
activities, including:
enhanced risk assessment capabilities
across species and vectors; further
ballast water compliance through
development of verification tools;
expanded baseline survey, re-survey
and targeted surveillance activities;
and database development to
enhance our current management of
marine data and develop
compatibility with international
management and research
organisations.
• Secondly, as part of the Biosecurity
Strategy implementation, marine
biosecurity functions and
accountabilities will be transferred
back to the Ministry of Agriculture
and Forestry from the Ministry of
Fisheries, pending ministerial
approval. This change will have little
impact on the operational capacity
of the marine biosecurity system,
and the synergies between the
currently sector-based biosecurity
functions will enhance the delivery
of biosecurity outcomes in the
marine environment",2004,English,Newspaper,Schaffelke2007,Yes,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Aquatic,Aquatic,marine,11,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,NA,Country,2004/2005,Year,2004,2005,2004,2005,Potentially ongoing,3900000.00,,,3354682.93,3356975.40,3900000.00,3354682.93,3356975.40,NZD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management,Pre-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"Note that this cost is included within the $6.9 million expenditure for 2004/5 in Schaffelke2007. Available from http://planet.uwc.ac.za/nisl/Biosecurity/biosecurity-53.pdf.  Title is not ""Changes to marine biosecurity"" as cited in Previous Material.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1409,,Schaffelke2007,Impacts of introduced seaweeds,"Schaffelke, B., Hewitt, C.L.","Our marine environment is of
significant value for New Zealand.
Economically, New Zealand fisheries
and aquaculture industries represent a
large portion of GDP, and this country
produces more than one percent of the
world’s total fisheries catch.
Environmentally, New Zealand
represents a hotspot for biodiversity.
New Zealand’s 120-million-year
geographic isolation from other
landmasses has resulted in a diverse
range of species endemic to New
Zealand (for example in 30 percent
of algae to over 95 percent of
sponges found).
New Zealanders, particularly Maori, also
have a strong sense of connection with
the marine environment. The value of
the marine environment to Maori is
holistic, based on spiritual and
traditional aspects of Maori culture.
Although putting a dollar value on
recreational and social use of the marine
environment is difficult, tourism
comprises about 9 percent of GDP and
is increasing annually.
World-class biosecurity system
As a discipline, marine biosecurity is in
its infancy. However, New Zealand’s
biosecurity system is acclaimed as world
class. At a recent Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation (APEC) meeting, the
marine component was identified as an
example for other nations.
In 1997, marine biosecurity functions
were transferred from the Ministry of
Agriculture and Forestry to the Ministry
of Fisheries. Subsequently, in 1999, as
part of the Government’s Biodiversity
Package, the development of a
comprehensive marine biosecurity
programme started. There was an
urgent need to manage one key threat
(ballast water), and simultaneously
identify the needs and appropriate
resources for establishing an appropriate
scale of biosecurity delivery. This
included developing a baseline
understanding of the current extent of
introductions in New Zealand’s
international ports (see Biosecurity
39:17).
Enhanced capability for
marine biosecurity
Marine biosecurity was recognised in
the Biosecurity Strategy as one key
component for enhanced capability in
the current biosecurity system, with
three expectations explicitly relating to
marine capability. Two specific
enhancements will occur to achieve this:
• Firstly, in this year’s budget, marine
biosecurity capability enhancement
was identified as a high priority, and
received additional funding of $3.9
million per annum. The focus of this
new money will largely be on preclearance
activities, including:
enhanced risk assessment capabilities
across species and vectors; further
ballast water compliance through
development of verification tools;
expanded baseline survey, re-survey
and targeted surveillance activities;
and database development to
enhance our current management of
marine data and develop
compatibility with international
management and research
organisations.
• Secondly, as part of the Biosecurity
Strategy implementation, marine
biosecurity functions and
accountabilities will be transferred
back to the Ministry of Agriculture
and Forestry from the Ministry of
Fisheries, pending ministerial
approval. This change will have little
impact on the operational capacity
of the marine biosecurity system,
and the synergies between the
currently sector-based biosecurity
functions will enhance the delivery
of biosecurity outcomes in the
marine environment",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Aquatic,Aquatic,marine,11,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,NA,Country,2004/2005,Year,2004,2005,2004,2005,Potentially ongoing,6900000.00,,,5935208.27,5939264.16,6900000.00,5935208.27,5939264.16,NZD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management,Pre-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"""the government agreed to a significant investment in enhanced marine biosecurity delivery in the 2004/05 budget, leading to an increase in marine biosecurity expenditure of almost 300% to ;NZ$ 6.9 million year-1 (;US$ 4.8 million year-1)""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1643,,ChalakHaghighi2008,Management strategies for an invasive weed: a dynamic programming approach for Californian thistle in New Zealand,Chalak Haghighi  M  Van Ierland  EC  Bourdot  GW  Leathwick  D,"Invasive plants can cause significant problems in natural and agricultural ecosystems. Although research has already been conducted on the economics of a single-control option for some invasive weeds, we extended the analysis by developing a dynamic optimisation model that evaluates the net benefits of a range of possible control options simultaneously in order to identify the optimal strategy (mix of control options). This paper focuses on Californian thistle (Cirsium arvense) in pasture in New Zealand. The net benefit is maximised by considering the costs and efficacy of control options, and the monetary value of animal production. Trajectories of shoot density are developed and the optimal strategies are found. Our results suggest that the introduction of a biological control agent (Apion onopordi), in combination with one or more control options, is the optimal strategy when the initial density of the thistle population exceeds 1.0 shoot m-2. Results show that in the setting of the model excluding MCPA, MCPB and a Sclerotinia sclerotiorum-based mycoherbicide reduces the net present value (NPV) by less than 2%.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Gourlay AH 2004. Classical biological control of Californian thistle: the New Zealand story. 14th Australian Weeds Conference, NSW Australia, Wagga Wagga. Pp. 374-377.",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Cirsium,Cirsium arvense,,Californian thistle,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,agricultural habitats,12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,27000000.00,27000000.00,27000000.00,23224728.01,23240598.90,27000000.00,23224728.01,23240598.90,NZD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage-loss/Eradication,Mixed,NA,Low,,,,,no,Reported in linked publication as a combination of mowing and sheep treatment costs due to resulting disease,Emma J. Hudgins,No
NE3228,Gs,GISP1,Programa Mundial sobre Especies Invasoras,Sue Matthews,,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Mesostigmata,Varroidae,Varroa,Varroa jacobsoni,,Varroa mite,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,NA,non-urban,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,434.50,267.00,602.00,545.36,,434.50,545.36,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,Beekeeping. Original name in document was a synonym: Varroa destructor,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
1456,TC,595,"The State of Australia's Birds 2006. Invasive Species. Wingspan 16, supplement",Olsen et al,,2005,English,Official report,"Poon, E., Westcott, D. A., Burrows, D., & Webb, A. (2007). Assessment of research needs for the management of invasive species in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of the Wet Tropics.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,1380000.00,,,1322746.82,,1380000.00,1322746.82,,AUD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[Biosecurity Australia, 2005, cited in Olsen et al. 2006] For example, in New Zealand an outbreak of fire ants was dealt with in the early stages of invasion and cost $1.38 m, whereas the delays in responding to the outbreaks of fire ants in Brisbane have resulted in an eradication program costing $175 m over six years. (Biosecurity Australia 2005, ). The reference was not found in Olsen et al., nor in Poon et al.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
367,GS,299,Beyond Kapiti - a decade of invasive rodent eradications from new zealand islands,Broome,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans/Rattus norvegicus,,Polynesian rat/Brown rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Titi Islands/Taukihepa/Rerewhakaupoko/Pukeweka/Mokonui,Site,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,249500.00,,,285066.61,310330.18,249500.00,285066.61,310330.18,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Excludes Doc and owners’ time  
(also converted to 163 200USD 2009)
Details provided for the total area, and how the eradication was done, but not for prices.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC1051,,Schaffelke2007,Impacts of introduced seaweeds,"Schaffelke, B., Hewitt, C.L.","We analyzed 69 publications on the impacts of introduced
seaweeds. The predominant impacts were
changed competitive relationships in the recipient habitat,
indicated by high abundances of invaders, resultant
space monopolization, and reduced abundances/biomass
of native macrophytes. Changes in biodiversity,
effects on fish and invertebrate fauna, toxic effects on
other biota, and habitat change were also identified. The
mechanisms underlying the manifestation of impacts are
uncertain and inferences about common patterns were
hampered because impact studies were available for only
a few introduced seaweeds, covered only a fraction of
their introduced distribution and generally were conducted
over short time scales. There was no information
about evolutionary effects or changes of ecosystem
processes. Knowledge of socio-economic impacts of
invasive seaweeds is poor. We collated costs associated
with control/eradication activities and for national spending
on marine biosecurity in Australia, New Zealand and
the United States. Prevention of impacts is the driving
force for costly surveillance, eradication and control programs.
Until we are able to understand, predict and
measure impacts of introduced seaweeds, the management
of species incursions needs to remain focused on
early detection, rapid response and control to reduce the
likelihood of negative impact effects.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse/Unspecified,Aquatic,Aquatic,NA,11,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,2006,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,800000.00,,,945757.60,1012346.21,800000.00,945757.60,1012346.21,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"The New Zealand public good science
funding agency, the Foundation for Research,
Science and Technology (FRST), has explicitly allocated
NZ$ 1.2 million year-1 (;US$ 0.8 million year-1) towards
marine biosecurity research (C.L. Hewitt personal communication).",Ross Cuthbert,No
SC549_Wang,TC,Wang2020,Prevalence and management of Solenopsis invicta in China,Wang et al,"Red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, was first found in Taiwan province of China in 2003. To prevent transboundary expansion, the Chinese government has formulated various control strategies in the last 15 years to slow down the spread of S. invicta. Despite all efforts, S. invicta invasion has reached more than 390 counties of 13 provinces and two special administrative regions in China; at present, S. invicta remains at the stage of rapid expansion. The transnational entry of S. invicta is linked to imported logs and wastepaper coming mostly from the United States. In domestic settings, long-distance expansion of S. invicta relied on potted plant and turf transportation. Both monogyne and polygyne social forms of S. invicta were present in China with polygyne colonies as the dominant one. Data on population and breeding dynamics of S. invicta reveal the presence of two peaks annually with nuptial flights occurring throughout the year. Arthropods, plant seeds, and honeydew are important food sources of S. invicta, thereby causing negative impacts on the abundance, diversity, and richness of native arthropod communi- ties. Fire ants are threats not only to agriculture and power facilities, but also to human health, with more than 30% of people having suffered from the sting and 10% having experienced an allergic reaction. To address the expansion of S. invicta, the National Fire Ant Detection and Management Union was estab- lished and the formulation and implementation of management policies were drawn. Plant quarantine be- comes an essential step in fire ant management, whereas the two-step method of combing toxic baits and contact dust emerges as the forefront method crucial in managing S. invicta. The experience and lessons learned from fire ant management in China could benefit other countries when facing similar challenges.",2020,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Pan Pac Forest Products plant,12a,,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Whirinaki,Unit (12.56 km2),3years,Period,2006,2008,2006,2008,One-time,7410000.00,,,7233320.13,,2470000.00,2411106.71,,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Surveillance,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"""For example, New Zealand spent three years and ca 7.41 million USD to eradicate S. invicta successfully from a 12.56 km2 area of Whirinaki, which means that New Zealand spent 0.20 million USD per km2 in one year (http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/ PA0611/S00286.htm, accessed on 2019-6-5; http://b3.net.nz/gerda/refs/14.pdf, accessed on 2019-6-5). See more infromation in Christian S (2009) Red imported fire ants eradicated from Napier. Biosecurity Magazine 92:28-29",Elena Angulo/Alok Bang,Yes
308,TC,240,"Decision: Application for the Reassessment of a Hazardous Substance under Section 63 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996. Sodium Fluoroacetate (1080) and Formulated Substances Containing 1080. No. HRE05002. Environmental Risk Management Authority, Wellington, New Zealand, pp. 1–214 (2007)","Environmental Risk Management Authority, Wellington, New Zealand",,2007,English,Official report,"Nugent, G., Warburton, B., Thomson, C., Cross, M. L., & Coleman, M. C. (2012). Bait aggregation to reduce cost and toxin use in aerial 1080 baiting of small mammal pests in New Zealand. Pest Management Science, 68(10), 1374–1379. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3315",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,26.00,,,22.59,20.42,26.00,22.59,20.42,NZD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"""Aerial 1080 operations in New Zealand cover nearly 600 000 ha annually,at an estimated average operational cost of $NZ 26 per hectare."" in Nugents, reference but not found",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
322,WoS,6614,A novel approach to assess the probability of disease eradication from a wild-animal reservoir host,Anderson et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Blythe Valley,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,42750.00,,,36888.35,31108.30,42750.00,36888.35,31108.30,NZD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Possum trapping survey. No reference,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
323,WoS,6614,A novel approach to assess the probability of disease eradication from a wild-animal reservoir host,Anderson et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Mustela,Mustela furo,,Ferret,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Blythe Valley,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,28500.00,,,24592.23,20738.86,28500.00,24592.23,20738.86,NZD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Ferret survey. No reference,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
368,GS,299,Beyond Kapiti - a decade of invasive rodent eradications from new zealand islands,Broome,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Mus/Rattus,Mus musculus/Rattus rattus,,House mouse/Black rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Pomona/Rona,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,61500.00,,,70266.92,76494.21,61500.00,70266.92,76494.21,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Rodent component only. Includes monitoring  
(also converted to 39 200 USD 2009)
Details provided for the total area, and how the eradication was done, but not for prices.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
920,TC,524,State and Not-For-Profit delivery of species conservation: cost utility analysis of multiple-species projects,Vessey,,2010,English,Official report,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Introduced pests (mainly mammalian predators),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Bushy Park,Unit (98 Ha),2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,252940.00,,,219762.15,198647.26,252940.00,219762.15,198647.26,NZD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Table 5 : Summary of annualised costs for each project (n=,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
921,TC,524,State and Not-For-Profit delivery of species conservation: cost utility analysis of multiple-species projects,Vessey,,2010,English,Official report,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Introduced pests (mainly mammalian predators),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Karori,Unit (252 Ha),2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,1170327.00,,,1016816.53,919120.15,1170327.00,1016816.53,919120.15,NZD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Table 5 : Summary of annualised costs for each project (n=,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
922,TC,524,State and Not-For-Profit delivery of species conservation: cost utility analysis of multiple-species projects,Vessey,,2010,English,Official report,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Introduced pests (mainly mammalian predators),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Maungatautari,"Unit (3,363 Ha)",2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,641893.00,,,557696.62,504112.77,641893.00,557696.62,504112.77,NZD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Table 5 : Summary of annualised costs for each project (n=,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
923,TC,524,State and Not-For-Profit delivery of species conservation: cost utility analysis of multiple-species projects,Vessey,,2010,English,Official report,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Introduced pests (mainly mammalian predators),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Hurunui,"Unit (12,000 Ha)",2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,269506.00,,,234155.20,211657.42,269506.00,234155.20,211657.42,NZD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Table 5 : Summary of annualised costs for each project (n=,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
924,TC,524,State and Not-For-Profit delivery of species conservation: cost utility analysis of multiple-species projects,Vessey,,2010,English,Official report,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Introduced pests (mainly mammalian predators),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Project River Recovery,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,553348.00,,,480765.97,434573.67,553348.00,480765.97,434573.67,NZD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Table 5 : Summary of annualised costs for each project (n=,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
925,TC,524,State and Not-For-Profit delivery of species conservation: cost utility analysis of multiple-species projects,Vessey,,2010,English,Official report,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Introduced pests (mainly mammalian predators),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Operation Ark,"Unit (208,579 Ha)",2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,2310230.00,,,2007199.75,1814346.70,2310230.00,2007199.75,1814346.70,NZD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Table 5 : Summary of annualised costs for each project (n=,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
926,TC,524,State and Not-For-Profit delivery of species conservation: cost utility analysis of multiple-species projects,Vessey,,2010,English,Official report,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Introduced pests (mainly mammalian predators),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rotoiti,"Unit (5,000 Ha)",2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,477799.00,,,415126.65,375241.01,477799.00,415126.65,375241.01,NZD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Table 5 : Summary of annualised costs for each project (n=,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
407,TC,512,"Scoping the potential to eradicate rats, wild cats and possums from Stewart Island/Rakiura",Beaven,,2008,English,Official report,"Russell, J. C., Innes, J. G., Brown, P. H., & Byrom, A. E. (2015). Predator-free New Zealand: Conservation country. BioScience, 65(5), 520–525. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv012",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Diprotodontia/Rodentia,Felidae/Muridae/Phalangeridae,Felis/Rattus/Trichosurus,Felis catus/Rattus rattus/Trichosurus vulpecula,,Cat/Black rat/Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rakiura/Stewart Island,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2008,2008,One-time,49850000.00,38800000.00,60900000.00,39890785.15,38071608.53,49850000.00,39890785.15,38071608.53,NZD,2008,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Material available on line at https://issuu.com/ptait/docs/pest_eradication_plan. Cost depending on the eradication method employed.
Original report: 35 - 55 million NZ$ 2008 ( =38,8 to 60,9 million NZ$ 2013)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
537,WoS,10764,Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of Yellow-Eyed Penguin conservation measures,Busch and Cullen,,2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae/Felidae/Mustelidae,Canis/Felis/Mustela/Mustela,Canis lupus/Felis catus/Mustela erminea/Mustela furo,,Non-native ferrets/Stoats/Feral cats/Dogs,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,1456667.00,,,1165648.75,1112490.59,1456667.00,1165648.75,1112490.59,NZD,2008,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Comparison of 3 methods to protect birds => trapping predators. data from Table 7,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
917,TC,499,Restoration and Management Theory: Are predator proof fences the answer to New Zealand's terrestrial biodiversity crisis? ,Scofield et al,,2010,English,Unpublished material,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Predators,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Wanganui,Unit (5.45 Km),2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,50000.00,,,40498.93,37582.46,50000.00,40498.93,37582.46,NZD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"[Scofield et al., 2010, Restoration and Management Theory: Are predator proof fences the answer to New Zealand's terrestrial biodiversity crisis? Unpublished Article] Costs in table 1. Reference but 'unpublished article' = impossible to verify this data. No details about the species.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
918,TC,499,Restoration and Management Theory: Are predator proof fences the answer to New Zealand's terrestrial biodiversity crisis? ,Scofield et al,,2010,English,Unpublished material,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Predators,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Wellington (urban areas),Unit (8.7 Km),2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,2200000.00,,,1781952.72,1653628.45,2200000.00,1781952.72,1653628.45,NZD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"[Scofield et al., 2010, Restoration and Management Theory: Are predator proof fences the answer to New Zealand's terrestrial biodiversity crisis? Unpublished Article] Costs in table 1. Reference but 'unpublished article' = impossible to verify this data. No details about the species.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
919,TC,499,Restoration and Management Theory: Are predator proof fences the answer to New Zealand's terrestrial biodiversity crisis? ,Scofield et al,,2010,English,Unpublished material,"Norton, D. A., & Warburton, B. (2015). The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12345",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Predators,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Cambridge,Unit (47 Km),2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,14000000.00,,,11339699.11,10523090.13,14000000.00,11339699.11,10523090.13,NZD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"[Scofield et al., 2010, Restoration and Management Theory: Are predator proof fences the answer to New Zealand's terrestrial biodiversity crisis? Unpublished Article] Costs in table 1. Reference but 'unpublished article' = impossible to verify this data. No details about the species.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1730,WoS,7468,Valuing impacts of the invasive alga Didymosphenia geminata on recreational angling,Beville et al ,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,Didymo,Aquatic,Aquatic,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,10050000.00,6040000.00,14060000.00,8042174.34,7675419.57,10050000.00,8042174.34,7675419.57,NZD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Non-market estimation of cost of Didymo on recreational anglers on the basis of a ""choice"" (survey) approach. The reported cost here is the naïve cost of Didymo, i.e. aggregated estimated cost without behavioural change.",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
SC91,,ChalakHaghighi2008,Management strategies for an invasive weed: a dynamic programming approach for Californian thistle in New Zealand,Chalak Haghighi  M  Van Ierland  EC  Bourdot  GW  Leathwick  D,"Invasive plants can cause significant problems in natural and agricultural ecosystems. Although research has already been conducted on the economics of a single-control option for some invasive weeds, we extended the analysis by developing a dynamic optimisation model that evaluates the net benefits of a range of possible control options simultaneously in order to identify the optimal strategy (mix of control options). This paper focuses on Californian thistle (Cirsium arvense) in pasture in New Zealand. The net benefit is maximised by considering the costs and efficacy of control options, and the monetary value of animal production. Trajectories of shoot density are developed and the optimal strategies are found. Our results suggest that the introduction of a biological control agent (Apion onopordi), in combination with one or more control options, is the optimal strategy when the initial density of the thistle population exceeds 1.0 shoot m-2. Results show that in the setting of the model excluding MCPA, MCPB and a Sclerotinia sclerotiorum-based mycoherbicide reduces the net present value (NPV) by less than 2%.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Gourlay AH 2004. Classical biological control of Californian thistle: the New Zealand story. 14th Australian Weeds Conference, NSW Australia, Wagga Wagga. Pp. 374-377.",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Cirsium,Cirsium arvense,,Californian thistle,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,agricultural habitats,12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,Canterbury,Canterbury,Unit (ha),2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,174.40,34.00,314.80,139.56,133.19,174.40,139.56,133.19,NZD,2008,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Estimates of optimal treatment strategies for eradication per hectare,Emma J. Hudgins,No
SC2633,TC,Salamolard2008,Mise en place d'un dispositif permanent de veille et d'intervention pour la prévention des invasions biologiques à la Réunion,Salamolard et al,,2008,French,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,forestiers,1,,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2008,2008,One-time,165000000.00,,,157569318.46,,165000000.00,157569318.46,,AUD,2008,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,S'il (bombyx disparate) s'établissait en nouvelle-Z&lande le bombys disparate pourrait potentiellement coûter 165 millions de dollars de dommages forestiers par an à l'industrie forestière néo-zélandaise.,Celine Albert/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
898,TC,264,Economic costs of pests to New Zealand. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Biosecurity New Zealand Technical Paper no. 2009/31,Nimmo-Bell,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia/Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse (animals/plants),Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2013,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,1440000000.00,,,1242554798.81,1047858391.95,1440000000.00,1242554798.81,1047858391.95,NZD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Material available on line at https://docplayer.net/12579821-Economic-costs-of-pests-to-new-zealand-maf-biosecurity-new-zealand-technical-paper-no-2009-31.html
. Nimmo-Bell (2009) estimated that plant, vertebrate, and invertebrate pests cause NZ$1.44 billion in 2013 dollars in output losses annually.
ot found because it was ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
552,GS,283,The slippery slope of exporting invasive species: The case of Himalayan tahr arriving in South America,Flueck,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Hemitragus,Hemitragus jemlahicus,,Himalayan tahr,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,300000.00,,,337234.67,312949.30,300000.00,337234.67,312949.30,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,No reference provided,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
553,GS,283,The slippery slope of exporting invasive species: The case of Himalayan tahr arriving in South America,Flueck,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Hemitragus,Hemitragus jemlahicus,,Himalayan tahr,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,20000000.00,,,22482311.46,20863286.36,20000000.00,22482311.46,20863286.36,USD,2010,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,No reference provided,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC853,,Harris2010,"Meeting the requirements of the Biosecurity Act 1993: Economic evaluation of regional pest management strategy
for plant pests – prepared for Environment Canterbury.
Christchurch: Harris Consulting",Harris S,,2010,English,Official report,Saunders et al 2017,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella neesiana,,chilean needle grass,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b\12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,Canterbury District,South Island,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,232000.00,,,187915.01,174311.89,232000.00,187915.01,174311.89,NZD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Also estimated cost of doing no control and so net benefit (which might outstrip cost),,No
SC1011,,Lamoureaux2015,Comparison of management strategies for controlling Nassella trichotoma in modified tussock grasslands in New Zealand: a spatial and economic analysis,Lamoureaux  SL  Basse  B  Bourdot  GW  Saville  DJ,"The weedy grass Nassella trichotoma (nassella tussock), historically an economically damaging invader of modified tussock grasslands in New Zealand, currently causes little if any reduction in farm production. This is a result of successful historical regional management programmes in which plants have been removed manually (by grubbing) each year before they seed. To inform a debate about the need for ongoing regional management, we developed a stage?structured spatially explicit integrodifference equation population model and linked this to a cost analysis. We used the model to compare the weed's future population trajectories and related regional control costs over 50 years under three alternative management scenarios. The total discounted (3% p.a.) costs of no management , three?yearly grubbing and continued annual grubbing were NZ $417 million, $736 million and $131 million respectively. These analyses indicate that annual grubbing of N. trichotoma returns a net benefit of $286 million ($417 – $131 million) compared with doing nothing and a net benefit of $605 million ($736 – $131 million) compared with a 3?yearly grubbing programme. These results support the continuation of annual grubbing as the long?term economically optimal management strategy for N. trichotoma on pastoral farms infested by the weed in New Zealand.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella trichotoma,,Weedy grass,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,pastoral properties,4,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,North Canterbury,Hurunui District,Site,2010-2011,Period,2010,2011,2010,2011,Potentially ongoing,657126.40,,,679590.70,660479.30,328563.20,339795.35,330239.65,USD,2015,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,yes,,Ana Novoa,No
405,TC,543,"Targeting multiple species: A more efficient approach to pest eradication. Pages 172–176 in Veitch CR, Clout MN, and Towns DR, eds. Island Invasives: Eradication and Management. International Union for Conservation of Nature",Griffith,,2011,English,Official report,"In Russell, J. C., Innes, J. G., Brown, P. H., & Byrom, A. E. (2015). Predator-free New Zealand: Conservation country. BioScience, 65(5), 520–525. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv012",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse (predators),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rangitoto/Motutapu ,Unit (Ha),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2011,2011,One-time,993.00,,,856.85,722.59,993.00,856.85,722.59,NZD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,For example; eradicating invasive predators from the 3820 ha Rangitoto-Motutapu islands in the Hauraki Gulf cost NZ$993 per ha in 2013 dollars (Griffiths 2011),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC71,,Chalak2011,Biological control of invasive plant species,"Chalak, M, Ruijs, A, van Ierland EC","Biological control agents are regarded as a relatively safe method to control weeds. However, their impact on weeds can be relatively low and unpredictable.The aims of this article were to: (i) assess whether or not a weevil (Apion onopordi) and a mycoherbicide (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) are desirable as biological agents for the control of Californian thistle (Cirsium arvense) in New Zealand despite their uncertain effectiveness; (ii) identify the combination of control options that is optimal to control the thistle; (iii) analyze the economic consequences of excluding chemicals from the weed control strategy; and (iv) assess the feasibility of the eradication of this weed.Two optimization models were developed and compared: one deterministic model and one stochastic model.The results showed that taking into account the stochastic effectiveness of biological agents can change the optimal integrated strategy, particularly if the biological control agent is relatively expensive. However, for a cheaper biological agent, the stochastic efficacy is less likely to change the optimal control strategy. On the basis of the modeling results, the authors argue that, in the context of the agri-environmental setting of this article’s case study, chemicals can be replaced by more environmentally friendly control options at a relatively low cost.The authors also show that the eradication of the thistle is unlikely, at least given the efficacy of the existing control methods.",2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Cirsium,Cirsium arvense,,Californian thistle,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,"pastures, rangeland, other agricultural land",4b\12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,Diverse/Unspecified,Unspecified,Unit (ha),annual treatments for 40 year management program,Period,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,127.80,3.00,322.00,110.02,93.72,127.80,110.02,93.72,NZD,2011,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Management,Management,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,"Table 1 gives a list of possible control options and their cost per hectare. The cost per ha references Fleming 2003, but that gives methods and no costs, so presumably the authors calculated the costs based on those methods?  This paper models different control options to see what's most effective w/and w/o the use of chemical controls.  I list the full range of costs per ha for min and max and chose the most commonly recommended option for moderate infestations for the main cost estimate.  Note that they simulate 40 years worth of treatments to determine the optimal method, but as far as I can tell, the cost is for a single round (1 year) of control per hectare",Jennifer Bufford,No
SC2023,,Trolove2016,Seasonal dynamics of ground cover in Cirsium arvense – a basis for estimating grazing losses and economic impacts,"Bourdot GW, Hurrell GA, Trolove M, Saville DJ",,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,Saunders et al 2017,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Cirsium,Cirsium arvense,,californian thistle,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b\12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,2011-12,Year,2011,2012,2011,2012,Potentially ongoing,685000000.00,,,487002491.10,475999845.91,685000000.00,487002491.10,475999845.91,NZD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,Annual estimate broken down by livestock sector (dairy/meat/deer at 446/233/6). A cost of all pastoral weeds to NZ of 1.2billionNZD (Bourdot et al 2007) likely an underestimate given thistle alone estimated at haf this value,,No
318,WoS,7807,"Minimising number killed in long-term vertebrate pest management programmes, and associated economic incentives",Warburton et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,"Unit (9,000,000 Ha)",2012,Year,2012,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,100000000.00,,,86497320.67,71383163.06,100000000.00,86497320.67,71383163.06,NZD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"No calculation, no reference",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
319,WoS,7807,"Minimising number killed in long-term vertebrate pest management programmes, and associated economic incentives",Warburton et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,"Unit (1,000 Ha)",2012,Year,2012,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,150000.00,,,129745.98,107074.74,150000.00,129745.98,107074.74,NZD,2012,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"The Ramsey and Efford (2005) control strategy (ie maintaining possums below a 2% trap-catch using annual maintenance control; strategy 3 in Figures 3 and 4) is predicted to eradicate TB from wild possum populations within 7 years. In our model, this would result in approximately 10,000 possums being killed per 1,000 ha, at a total cost of about NZ$150 per hectare. In contrast, the Barlow (1991) strategy (ie an initial 50% kill followed by annual maintenance control at half K; strategy 1 in Figures 3 and 4) is predicted to take at least 20 years to eliminate TB, resulting in a predicted 18,000 possums killed per 1,000 ha also at a cost of about NZ$150 per hectare",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
320,WoS,7807,"Minimising number killed in long-term vertebrate pest management programmes, and associated economic incentives",Warburton et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus rattus,,Black rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (100 Ha),2012,Year,2012,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,800.00,200.00,800.00,691.98,571.07,800.00,691.98,571.07,NZD,2012,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Of the two ship rat control strategies simulated, the aerial control option timed by predicted population irruptions was predicted to kill fewer animals in the long term (Figure 5). This option also had a considerably lower cost in the long term (ie < NZ$200 per 100 ha over 20 years) than the alternative strategy (ie > NZ$800 per 100 ha over 20 years).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
421,WoS,3948,Aerial prefeeding followed by ground based toxic baiting for more efficient and acceptable poisoning of invasive small mammalian pests,Morgan et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia/Rodentia,Muridae/Phalangeridae,Rattus/Trichosurus,Rattus spp./Trichosurus vulpecula,,Rats/Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Retaruke Forest,Unit (Forest),June-August 2012 ,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,15051.00,11418.00,18684.00,10854.81,10634.52,15051.00,10854.81,10634.52,NZD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Two field trials were carried out in conjunction with aerial 1080 operations conducted by TBfree New Zealand (the agency responsible for managing bovine tuberculosis in New Zealand). Trial 1 was conducted during June-August 2012 in the Retaruke Forest, about 20 km due west of Mount Ruapehu. The comparison was restricted to the two treatments that used 1080 baits (aerial and ground-applied) 
[see Table 1] -> 1038 ha.
""In gently undulating terrain adjacent to road access, aerially prefed ground 1080 baiting was predicted to cost $11–18 per ha""
-> range = 11*1038 - 18*1038",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC1994,,Saunders2017,The economic costs of weeds on productive land in New Zealand,"Saunders JT, Greer G, Bourdot G, Saunders C, James T, Rolando C, Monge J, Watt MS",,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Ranunculus,Ranunculus acris,,giant (meadow) buttercup,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b\12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,2012-2030,Year,2012,2024,2012,2024,Potentially ongoing,379000000.00,166000000.00,592000000.00,325543787.54,272376734.68,379000000.00,325543787.54,272376734.68,NZD,2014,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Herbicide deployed, value range depends on speed of invasion front (low, med, high), costs annuitized over the extrapolation period. The cost here reported is a mean estimate.",Thomas Bodey,No
SC2021,,Saunders2017,The economic costs of weeds on productive land in New Zealand,"Saunders JT, Greer G, Bourdot G, Saunders C, James T, Rolando C, Monge J, Watt MS",,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Ranunculus,Ranunculus acris,,giant (meadow) buttercup,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b\12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,2012-2030,Year,2012,2024,2012,2024,Potentially ongoing,643000000.00,410000000.00,876000000.00,552307797.86,462106175.20,643000000.00,552307797.86,462106175.20,NZD,2014,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"No response mounted, value range depends on speed of invasion front (low, med, high), costs annuitized over the extrapolation period. The cost reported here is a mean estimate.",Thomas Bodey,No
SC2862,WoS,Brown et al 2019,feasibility of eradicating the large white butterfly (pieris brassicae) from new zealand: data gathering to inform decisions about the feasibility of eradication,Brown K; Phillips CB; Broome K; Green C; Toft R; Walker G,"Pieris brassicae, large white butterfl y, was fi rst found in New Zealand in Nelson in May 2010. The Ministry
for Primary Industries (MPI) responded with a monitoring programme until November 2012 when the Department of
Conservation (DOC) commenced an eradication programme. DOC was highly motivated to eradicate P. brassicae by
the risk it posed to New Zealand endemic cress species, some of which are already nearly extinct. DOC eliminated the
butterfl y from Nelson in less than four years at a cost of ca. NZ$5 million. This is the fi rst time globally that a butterfl y has
been purposefully eradicated. Variation in estimates of benefi ts, costs, the effi cacy of detection and control tools, and the
probability of eradication success all contributed to uncertainty about the feasibility. Cost benefi t analyses can contribute
to assessing feasibility but are prone to inaccurate assumptions when data are limited, and other feasibility questions are
equally important in considering the best course of action. Uncertainty does not equate to risk and reducing uncertainty
through data gathering can inform feasibility and decision making while increasing the probability of eradication success.",2019,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Pieridae,Pieris,Pieris brassicae,,large white butterfly,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,NA,,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Nelson,Site,2012-2016,Period,2012,2016,2012,2016,One-time,4970000.00,,,3139351.86,3309552.76,994000.00,627870.37,661910.55,NZD,2019,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"DOC eliminated the
butterfl y from Nelson in less than four years at a cost of ca. NZ$5 million.",Celine Albert,no
316,WoS,941,Valuing conservation benefits of disease control in wildlife: A choice experiment approach to bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand's native forests,Tait et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,66000000.00,,,56950428.28,48026842.96,66000000.00,56950428.28,48026842.96,NZD,2013,Effective,Potential,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Personal loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"WTP from people  to protect These improvements combined yield a value of $NZ 156 ($132 - $179) per person annually relative to the magnitude of benefits achieved by DOC
+ counted ""WTP = 0"" for non-repondents --> 66 MNZ$ / year > control costs",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
393,WoS,5165,Monitoring ungulates in steep non-forest habitat: A comparison of faecal pellet and helicopter counts,Forsyth et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae/Cervidae,Capra/Cervus/Rupicapra,Capra hircus/Cervus elaphus/Rupicapra rupicapra,,Feral goat/Red deer/Alpine chamois,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,12 sites in the Southern Alps,Site,March 2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,55265.00,,,47470.13,39717.41,55265.00,47470.13,39717.41,NZD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"/!\ invasiveness is not a central notion in this article, but all 3 sp are invasive in NZ
55 265 (cost of feacal pellet count)
",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
402,WoS,4239,"Successful eradication of invasive vertebrates on Rangitoto and Motutapu Islands, New Zealand",Griffiths et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Erinaceomorpha/Lagomorpha/Rodentia,Erinaceidae/Felidae/Leporidae/Muridae/Mustelidae,Erinaceus/Felis/Mus/Mustela/Oryctolagus/Rattus,Erinaceus europaeus/Felis catus/Mus musculus/Mustela erminea/Oryctolagus cuniculus/Rattus norvegicus/Rattus exulans/Rattus rattus,,Hedgehog/Cat/House mouse/Stoat/Rabbit/Polynesian Rat/Black rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rangitoto/Motutapu ,Site,2 years,Period,2013,2015,2013,2015,One-time,4500000.00,,,3245409.08,3179544.36,2250000.00,1622704.54,1589772.18,NZD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of eradication = 4 500 000 overheads included; 3 200 000 when overheads excluded.
(additional information : ""Based on data from other projects that targeted rodents, cats and rabbits (unpubl. data), if a unique operation had been conducted independently for rodents, cats, stoats, hedgehogs and rabbits, and if rodents had been targeted last, we estimate the total cost for removing the eight IAS present on Rangitoto and Motutapu to have been approximately NZ$9.7 M"")",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
408,WoS,4210,Predator-free New Zealand: Conservation country,Russell et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse (predators),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2013,Period,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,15880000000.00,5540000000.00,26220000000.00,13702618197.95,11555549489.00,15880000000.00,,,NZD,2013,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Scaling-up of previous mentionned figures to the whole New Zealand. 
Based on previous figures taken from other article",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
422,WoS,3948,Aerial prefeeding followed by ground based toxic baiting for more efficient and acceptable poisoning of invasive small mammalian pests,Morgan et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia/Rodentia,Muridae/Phalangeridae,Rattus/Trichosurus,Rattus spp./Trichosurus vulpecula,,Rats/Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Upper Grey Valley,Site,July-September 2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,328671.50,249337.00,408006.00,237038.55,232227.91,328671.50,237038.55,232227.91,NZD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Two field trials were carried out in conjunction with aerial 1080 operations conducted by TBfree New Zealand (the agency responsible for managing bovine tuberculosis in New Zealand). Trial 2 was conducted during July-September 2013 in the Upper Grey Valley, about 25km due south of Reefton. The comparison was restricted to the two treatments that used 1080 baits (aerial and ground-applied) [see Table 1] -> 22667 ha.
Cost per ha = $11-18
range = 11* 22667 to 18*22667",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
899,WoS,4210,Predator-free New Zealand: Conservation country,Russell et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,1830000000.00,,,1579080056.82,1331653373.10,1830000000.00,1579080056.82,1331653373.10,NZD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Forestry ,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Accounting for losses to upstream and downstream industries via the multiplier effect suggests that annual losses to primary industry from animal and invertebrate pests reach as much as NZ$1.83 billion in 2013 dollars, or 0.87% of GDP.  Primary industry = Agriculture and forestry",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1035,WoS,6960,Invasive animals and wildlife pathogens in the United States: The economic case for more risk assessments and regulation,Jenkins et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse (animals),Aquatic/Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Species),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2013,2013,One-time,38451.00,2485.00,74417.00,40458.50,34119.04,38451.00,40458.50,34119.04,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management,Pre-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"[Campbell, 2013, Personal communication] Risk assessment costs for non-native animals : New Zealand Environmental Protection Authority: minimum $2,485; maximum $74,417 (Donna Campbell, pers. comm.; note the high variation between the minimum and maximum is due to differences in the types of proposals and the assessment tasks included)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1304,GS,191,"Linking climate suitability, spread rates and host-impact when estimating the potential costs of invasive pests",Kriticos et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Notodontidae,Thaumetopoea,Thaumetopoea pityocampa,,Pine processary moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,30 years ,Period,2013,2043,2013,2043,Potentially ongoing,1441000000.00,,,1167179029.95,1083126633.68,48033333.33,38905967.67,36104221.12,NZD,2010,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"We calculate the median of the median of present value of impact across 3 scenarios presented : no control 2098M$, little control 1441M$ and good control 58M$. Costs based on spread simulations over 30 years.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1305,GS,191,"Linking climate suitability, spread rates and host-impact when estimating the potential costs of invasive pests",Kriticos et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Notodontidae,Thaumetopoea,Thaumetopoea pityocampa,,Pine processary moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,30 years,Period,2013,2043,2013,2043,Potentially ongoing,112000000.00,9000000.00,215000000.00,90717592.89,84184721.01,3733333.33,3023919.76,2806157.37,NZD,2010,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"We calculate the median of the median of present value of treatment costs across 2 scenarios presented : little control 215M$ and good control 9M$. The study also runs simulations for a ""no control"" scenario, which is not included in the calculation of our median (as costs = 0$). Costs based on spread simulations over 30 years.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2559,WoS,MPI,Fruit fly surveillance programme [WWW document],MPI,,2013,English,Report,Dhami et al 2015_A real time PCR toolbox for accurate identification of invasive fruit fly species,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Ceratitis,Ceratitis spp.,,Fruit fly,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,NA,,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,1400000.00,,,1208039.39,1018751.21,1400000.00,1208039.39,1018751.21,NZD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Surveillance,Management,Pre-invasion management,High,,,,,no,The first group (95% of the total amount) included contracts for the destruction of plants (hereinafter group 1) amounted to 302 million rubles.,Celine Albert/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
296,WoS,2394,Wildlife detector dogs and camera traps: a comparison of techniques for detecting feral cats,Glen et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Hawke’s Bay (Waitere and Toronui Stations),Unit (2 Landholders),2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,60445.00,55430.00,65460.00,42973.53,42049.91,60445.00,42973.53,42049.91,NZD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring ,Management,Pre-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Test 2 methods to detect wildlife : Camera trapping (65 460 NZD) and wildlife detector dogs (55 430 NZD). Used to detect feral cats (Felis catus) on two pastoral Landholders in Hawke’s Bay, North Island, New Zealand.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
394,WoS,5165,Monitoring ungulates in steep non-forest habitat: A comparison of faecal pellet and helicopter counts,Forsyth et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae/Cervidae,Capra/Cervus/Rupicapra,Capra hircus/Cervus elaphus/Rupicapra rupicapra,,Feral goat/Red deer/Alpine chamois,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,12 sites in the Southern Alps,Site,3 times,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2014,2014,One-time,31913.00,,,27411.82,22934.98,31913.00,27411.82,22934.98,NZD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"/!\ invasiveness is not a central notion in this article --> but all 3 sp are invasive in NZ
31 913 (cost of helicopter counts)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
404,TC,473,Predator-Free Rakiura: An economic appraisal. The Morgan Foundation,Morgan and Simmons,,2014,English,Official report,"In Russell, J. C., Innes, J. G., Brown, P. H., & Byrom, A. E. (2015). Predator-free New Zealand: Conservation country. BioScience, 65(5), 520–525. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv012",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse (predators),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rakiura/Stewart Island ,"Unit (1,746 Km²)",Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,125900000.00,,,130358432.24,109068596.83,125900000.00,130358432.24,109068596.83,USD,2014,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,NPV of controlling predators in terms of ecosystem services saved,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
406,TC,461,Pest fencing or pest trapping: A bio-economic analysis of cost-effectiveness,Norbury et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,"In Russell, J. C., Innes, J. G., Brown, P. H., & Byrom, A. E. (2015). Predator-free New Zealand: Conservation country. BioScience, 65(5), 520–525. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv012",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse (predators),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,"Macraes Flat/eastern Otago
Burwood Bush/Southland","Unit (1,000 Ha)",2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,435232.00,224060.00,646404.00,373844.52,312789.11,435232.00,373844.52,312789.11,NZD,2014,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Projection over 50 years ; in this paper, table 3 provides examples of discounted annual costs of each control option as a function of area protected using the baseline parameter values inTable 1",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
434,WoS,1551,"Past, present and two potential futures for managing New Zealand’s mammalian pests",Parkes et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,54000000.00,,,46383547.57,38808294.65,54000000.00,46383547.57,38808294.65,NZD,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"""It began in the 1970s, paused in the 1980s, and then increased again to an annual expenditure in 2014 of c. $54 million.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1445,GS,134,Insect Eradication and Containment of Invasive Alien Species,Gordh and McKirdy,,2014,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Orgyia,Orgyia leucostigma,,White spotted tussock moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,20 years,Period,2014,2034,2014,2034,Potentially ongoing,76000000.00,19000000.00,133000000.00,78691349.09,65839661.31,3800000.00,3934567.45,3291983.07,USD,2014,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"See ?Table 14.1. Costs and averted economic impacts from eradications of forest insect pests in New Zealand, amounting to a combined net value of averted losses of USD$70 to $700 Million (adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010). Here we present the cost of eradication and the projected potential cost of damage over 20 years if the eradication is not undertaken. 
There are no details on calculations or initial values, or how these values are adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1447,GS,134,Insect Eradication and Containment of Invasive Alien Species,Gordh and McKirdy,,2014,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Uraba,Uraba lugens,,Gum leaf skeletoniser,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,20 years,Period,2014,2034,2014,2034,Potentially ongoing,91500000.00,76000000.00,107000000.00,94740242.65,79267486.97,4575000.00,4737012.13,3963374.35,USD,2014,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"See ?Table 14.1. Costs and averted economic impacts from eradications of forest insect pests in New Zealand, amounting to a combined net value of averted losses of USD$70 to $700 Million (adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010). Here we present the cost of eradication and the projected potential cost of damage over 20 years if the eradication is not undertaken. 
There are no details on calculations or initial values, or how these values are adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1450,GS,134,Insect Eradication and Containment of Invasive Alien Species,Gordh and McKirdy,,2014,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Lymantriidae,Teia,Teia anartoides,,Painted Apple Moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,20 years,Period,2014,2034,2014,2034,Potentially ongoing,155500000.00,44000000.00,267000000.00,161006641.89,134711412.28,7775000.00,8050332.09,6735570.61,USD,2014,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"See ?Table 14.1. Costs and averted economic impacts from eradications of forest insect pests in New Zealand, amounting to a combined net value of averted losses of USD$70 to $700 Million (adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010). Here we present the cost of eradication and the projected potential cost of damage over 20 years if the eradication is not undertaken. 
There are no details on calculations or initial values, or how these values are adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1452,GS,134,Insect Eradication and Containment of Invasive Alien Species,Gordh and McKirdy,,2014,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Hyphantria,Hyphantria cunea,,Fall Webworm,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,20 years,Period,2014,2034,2014,2034,Potentially ongoing,38000000.00,14000000.00,62000000.00,39345674.54,32919830.65,1900000.00,1967283.73,1645991.53,USD,2014,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"See ?Table 14.1. Costs and averted economic impacts from eradications of forest insect pests in New Zealand, amounting to a combined net value of averted losses of USD$70 to $700 Million (adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010). Here we present the cost of eradication and the projected potential cost of damage over 20 years if the eradication is not undertaken. 
There are no details on calculations or initial values, or how these values are adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1454,GS,134,Insect Eradication and Containment of Invasive Alien Species,Gordh and McKirdy,,2014,English,Book chapter,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy Moth,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,20 years,Period,2014,2034,2014,2034,Potentially ongoing,110000000.00,2000000.00,218000000.00,113895373.68,95294246.63,5500000.00,5694768.68,4764712.33,USD,2014,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"See ?Table 14.1. Costs and averted economic impacts from eradications of forest insect pests in New Zealand, amounting to a combined net value of averted losses of USD$70 to $700 Million (adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010). Here we present the cost of eradication and the projected potential cost of damage over 20 years if the eradication is not undertaken. 
There are no details on calculations or initial values, or how these values are adapted from Brockerhoff et al. 2010. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC1953,,Tozer2014,Modelling the economic impact of yellow bristle grass (Setaria pumila) on a Waikato dairy farm.,"Tozer KN, James TK, Brier B",,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,Saunders et al 2017,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Setaria,Setaria helvola,,yellow bristle grass,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b\12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,North Island,Unit (Island),2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,258000000.00,,,221610282.81,185417407.78,258000000.00,221610282.81,185417407.78,NZD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,based on extrapolation from a Farmax model based on a Waikato dairy farm,,No
SC2001,,Lamoureaux2015,Comparison of management strategies for controlling Nassella trichotoma in modified tussock grasslands in New Zealand: a spatial and economic analysis,Lamoureaux  SL  Basse  B  Bourdot  GW  Saville  DJ,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,Saunders et al 2017,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella trichotoma,,Nassella tussock,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b\12b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,Hurunui District,South Island,Site,2014-2064,Period,2014,2064,2014,2064,Potentially ongoing,433500000.00,131000000.00,736000000.00,312641074.63,303849005.87,8500000.00,6130217.15,5957823.64,NZD,2015,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,extrapolated costs over 50 years under 3 potential control strategies. Net benefit assessed over different programs,Thomas Bodey,No
409,WoS,4210,Predator-free New Zealand: Conservation country,Russell et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse (predators),Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,50 years,Period,2015,2065,2015,2065,Potentially ongoing,9040000000.00,,,7800482903.62,6578222127.24,180800000.00,156009658.07,131564442.54,NZD,2013,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Regarding extrapolated cost : Assuming $993/ha highest cost per ha, over a campaign of 50 years and a long-run inflation rate at the 25-year average of 2.55% and an 8% discount rate (the rate specified by the New Zealand Treasury for long-term investment projects) ==> NPV of costs of 9 040 000 000 $. /!\ the authors do not specify on which scale this takes place; this cost is inferior to the cost previously extrapolated to whole NZ using the same initial value 993.
Regarding averted losses (net present value): Assuming that 25% of the NZ$1.83 billion in annual damages to crops and timber is attributable to invasive predators and that 33% of inter-national tourists would spend one additional day visiting a PFNZ, the net present value of these averted losses total NZ$9.32 billion over 50 years, exceeding the upper-end estimates of the costs of achieving PFNZ even without considering the undoubtedly substantial benefits to ecosystem services. Calculations are not clear, and percentages are not referenced.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
410,WoS,4210,Predator-free New Zealand: Conservation country,Russell et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse predators,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,50 years,Period,2015,2065,2015,2065,Potentially ongoing,9320000000.00,,,8042090781.17,6781972370.12,186400000.00,160841815.62,135639447.40,NZD,2013,Effective,Potential,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,yes,NA,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
415,WoS,4357,Optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation,Warburton and Gormley,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Mustela,Mustela erminea,,Stoat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,43421.00,,,44905.38,43994.03,43421.00,44905.38,43994.03,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Trap costs + estimate of time for setting up and checking the traps (based on daily contract rate of $NZ300)
""most stoat populations could be managed at a trap cost of about $US11/ha using DOC 150 traps rather than $US17/ha if using A24 traps (Fig. 8b). Similarly, if the much cheaper snap-back traps are used, three of these could be used per site at a cost of only $US6.50/ha""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
416,WoS,4357,Optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation,Warburton and Gormley,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus rattus,,Black rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,650.00,,,672.22,658.58,650.00,672.22,658.58,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Trap costs + estimate of time for setting up and checking the traps (based on daily contract rate of $NZ300)
""if using six captures per site the DOC 150 traps would be the most expensive option ($US1100/ha), followed by the A24 ($US650/ha), and then the snap- back traps ($US280/ha)"". Median = 650",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
435,WoS,1551,"Past, present and two potential futures for managing New Zealand’s mammalian pests",Parkes et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Diprotodontia/Rodentia,Muridae/Mustelidae/Phalangeridae,Mus/Mustela/Trichosurus/Rattus,Mus musculus/Mustela erminea/Trichosurus vulpecula/Rattus rattus,,House mouse/Black rat/Common brushtail possum/Stoat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,32000000000.00,,,22736827146.82,21665318226.29,32000000000.00,22736827146.82,21665318226.29,NZD,2017,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Extrapolation based on (Griffiths et al. 2015) Rangitoto/Motutapu Islands => $1200/Ha applied to all NZ,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
509,WoS,4095,Cost-effective large-scale occupancy-abundance monitoring of invasive brushtail possums (Trichosurus Vulpecula) on New Zealand's public conservation land,Gormley et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,271 locations,Site,1-2 days,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2015,2015,One-time,4486.05,4352.44,4619.66,3235.35,3169.69,4486.05,3235.35,3169.69,NZD,2015,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring ,Management,Pre-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"cost for 1 day monitoring VS 2 days monitoring in each locations : 4352.44 - 4619.66  (well documented data).
Reducing trapping effort from two nights to one night on 271 sampling locations monitored annually =>annual saving of about $72,400. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
583,WoS,4498,The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control,Norton and Warburton,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Mustela,Mustela erminea,,Stoat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2015,Year,2015,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,5.00,,,5.17,5.07,5.00,5.17,5.07,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"""although more recent unpublished estimates suggest stoat control (lines of kill traps) costs approximately $5""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
584,WoS,4498,The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control,Norton and Warburton,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Diprotodontia/Rodentia,Mustelidae/Muridae/Phalangeridae,Mustela/Rattus/Trichosurus,Mustela erminea/Rattus rattus/Trichosurus vulpecula,,Stoat/Black rat/Possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2015,Year,2015,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,6.00,4.00,8.00,6.21,6.08,6.00,6.21,6.08,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"""targeting ship rats, stoats, and possums (3–4 yearly aerial applications of poison baits) costs $4–$8""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
585,WoS,4498,The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control,Norton and Warburton,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus rattus,,Black rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2015,Year,2015,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,17.00,,,17.58,17.22,17.00,17.58,17.22,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"""Controlling ship rats in forest areas costs about $17 (applying poison baits in bait stations when rodent irruptions are predicted [i.e., when produc- tion of mast is high]).""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
2163,TC,226,Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management.,"Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao",,2015,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse wilding IAS conifer trees,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,21000000.00,12000000.00,30000000.00,15145242.37,21277139.89,21000000.00,15145242.37,21277139.89,NZD,2015,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,yes,"“Average annual impact of wildings”; Full reference: Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao (2015). Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management. Scion",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2164,TC,226,Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management.,"Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao",,2015,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse wilding IAS conifer trees,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,22000000.00,,,15866444.39,22290337.03,22000000.00,15866444.39,22290337.03,NZD,2015,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,yes,"“Average annual impact of wildings”; Full reference: Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao (2015). Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management. Scion",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2165,TC,226,Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management.,"Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao",,2015,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse wilding IAS conifer trees,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,2300000.00,,,1658764.64,2330353.42,2300000.00,1658764.64,2330353.42,NZD,2015,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,yes,"“Average annual impact of wildings”; Full reference: Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao (2015). Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management. Scion",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2166,TC,226,Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management.,"Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao",,2015,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse wilding IAS conifer trees,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,91000000.00,,,65629383.60,92200939.52,91000000.00,65629383.60,92200939.52,NZD,2015,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,yes,"“Average annual impact of wildings”; Full reference: Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao (2015). Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management. Scion",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2167,TC,226,Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management.,"Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao",,2015,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse wilding IAS conifer trees,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,5777000.00,,,4166384.06,5853239.86,5777000.00,4166384.06,5853239.86,NZD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,yes,"“Spent annually on wilding conifer management by central and local governments”; Full reference: Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao (2015). Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management. Scion",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2168,TC,226,Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management.,"Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao",,2015,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse wilding IAS conifer trees,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,20 years (2015-2035),Year,2015,2035,2015,2035,One-time,2750000.00,,,1983305.55,2786292.13,2750000.00,1983305.55,2786292.13,NZD,2015,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,yes,"“Assuming that annual expenditure for the next 20 years will be constant, inflation adjusted, the total discounted expenditures would be approximately $55 million”; Full reference: Sandra J. Velarde, Thomas Paul, Juan Monge, Richard Yao (2015). Cost benefit analysis of wilding conifer management in New Zealand. Part I – Important impacts under current management. Scion",Ivan Jaric,Yes
SC2690,WoS,MacIntyre2015,An evaluation of the costs of pest wasps in new zealand,MacIntyre P; Hellstrom H,,2015,English,Report,Lester et al 2018_Invasion success and management strategies for social Vespula Wasps,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespula,Vespula spp,,Wasps,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,NA,,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,133000000.00,,,95919868.34,93061833.79,133000000.00,95919868.34,93061833.79,NZD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"MacIntyre
& Hellstrom (102) assessed the economic impact of V. germanica and V. vulgaris across industries,
society, and the natural environment in New Zealand. They estimated that these wasps cause an
annual cost of NZ$133 million to the economy",Celine Albert,no
131,TC,162,Accelerating predator free New Zealand,Cabinet,,2016,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Diprotodontia/Rodentia,Mustelidae/Muridae/Phalangeridae,Mustela/Rattus/Trichosurus,Mustela erminea/Trichosurus vulpecula,,Stoat/Rats/Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,7000000.00,,,4976667.79,4869705.63,7000000.00,4976667.79,4869705.63,NZD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Seed funding from central government for invasive mammalian eradication by 2050,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
132,WoS,1396,Eradicating mammals on New Zealand island reserves: What is left to do? ,Parkes et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Rodents,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Campbell Island/Rangitoto-Motutapu Islands/Raoul/Little Barrier and Hen Islands,Unit (Ha),2016,Year,2016,Unspecified,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,300.00,,,229.93,285.86,300.00,229.93,285.86,AUD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Costs on uninhabited islands : The implementation or operational cost to aerially sow brodifacoum baits against rodents averaged c. $300 ha-1 for New Zealand projects.
not found in refs McClelland 2001; Griffiths et al 2015; Holmes et al 2016",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
133,WoS,1396,Eradicating mammals on New Zealand island reserves: What is left to do? ,Parkes et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Auckland/Rakitu/Quail/Tarakaipa/Mauitaha/Awaiti/Masked/Araara/Stewart/Chatham/Great Barrier/Waiheke/Pitt/Motukawanui/Rakino,Site,2016,Year,2016,Unspecified,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,250000000.00,,,191606401.57,238218354.81,250000000.00,191606401.57,238218354.81,AUD,2017,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Costs on inhabited or farmed islands : can be much higher as a consequence of having to work around people and livestock, e.g. $800 ha-1 for Great Mercury Island and $7000 ha-1 for Lord Howe Island (K. Broome, pers. comm.). At $800 ha-1 the costs to aerially bait the four large, inhabited islands in Table 3 would approach $250 million.
/!\ number of ha in Table 3 * 800$ approach 280 million; approximation, no clear explanation why 800$ is chosen as cost per ha",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
138,WoS,1396,Eradicating mammals on New Zealand island reserves: What is left to do? ,Parkes et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Auckland/Chatham/Great Barrier/Waiheke/Pitt/D'Urville/Arapawa/Tarakaipa,Site,2016,Year,2016,Unspecified,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,83000000.00,,,58973645.41,56194419.15,83000000.00,58973645.41,56194419.15,NZD,2017,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Extrapolation from Morrisson Unknown No calculation or details provided. ,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
147,WoS,1396,Eradicating mammals on New Zealand island reserves: What is left to do? ,Parkes et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Stewart/Chatham/Auckland/Great Barrier/D'Urville/Waiheke/Arapawa/Pitt/Kawau/Masked/Rakino Islands,Site,2016,Year,2016,Unspecified,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,92000000.00,,,65368378.05,62287789.90,92000000.00,65368378.05,62287789.90,NZD,2017,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Feral cat eradication on 9 islands Extrapolation from per ha values from Campbell et al 2011 and Robinson & Copson 2014. No calculation provided.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
437,WoS,2347,Refining operational practice for controlling introduced European rabbits on agricultural lands in New Zealand,Latham et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Central Otago,Unit (Ha),20 years,Year,2016,2036,2016,2036,Potentially ongoing,14.75,13.58,15.91,10.48,10.26,14.75,10.48,10.26,NZD,2016,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"2 scenarios, use median ???           Plan over 20 years, using 2 controls (strip sown treatment every 5.5 tears  or broadcast baiting every 6.3 years) ""Over a 20-year farm management plan, this would translate into costs of $NZ 13.58 and $NZ 15.91 per hectare per year, respectively, for the two sowing methods.""  
Cost per hectare over 20 years (Strip-sowed VS Broadcast) = 271.64 - 318.14 (NZ$)
--> scenario 1 :  Pre RHD (Rabbit Haemorrhagic Disease) ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
438,WoS,2347,Refining operational practice for controlling introduced European rabbits on agricultural lands in New Zealand,Latham et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Central Otago,Unit (Ha),20 years,Period,2016,2036,2016,2036,Potentially ongoing,75000.00,5000.00,100000.00,53321.44,52175.42,3750.00,2666.07,2608.77,NZD,2016,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Predict savings of approximately $NZ 50,000–100,000 (depending on the state of RHD epidemics) over a 20-year farm management plan, assuming a conservative operational cost-saving per ha of 25% under strip-sowing.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
591,WoS,606,Confronting the risks of largescale invasive species control,Kopf et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Diprotodontia/Rodentia,Mustelidae/Phalangeridae/Unspecified,Trichosurus/Unspecified,Trichosurus vulpecula/Unspecified,,3 mustelids/3 rodents/Australian Brushtail Possum,Terrestrial,Diverse/Unspecified,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2016-2050,Period,2016,2050,2016,2050,Potentially ongoing,20588235.29,,,20426022.00,20574864.35,571428.57,583600.63,587853.27,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"""The New Zealand (green) government announced in 2016 US$20 million seed-funding to begin eradicating three groups of terrestrial invasive mammals: three mustelids, three rodents and the Australian brushtail possum, by 2050""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC1836,,Senator&Rozenberg2016,Assessment of economic and environmental impact of invasive plant species,"Senator, SA, and AG Rozenberg","This article presents data from a review of published works on the economic damage caused by invasive plant species, their ecological and economical impact, and the legal regulation of biological invasions.
It is concluded that it is necessary to elaborate and adopt a national strategy on alien species, federal regulatory acts concerning the policy on invasive organisms, and general approaches and criteria to evaluate the risk of their spread. Effective control of invasive species is only possible at the rational approach, which takes into consideration individual ecological-biological features of the species, their relations with other components of the community, the properties of the ecosystem invaded by them, expenditures for their control, and the period and consequences of their eradication.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Plants,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,NA,non-urban,N,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,100000000.00,,,78850664.45,82061414.42,100000000.00,78850664.45,82061414.42,NZD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,,Ana Novoa,No
SC2068,,Senator&Rozenberg2016,Assessment of economic and environmental impact of invasive plant species,"Senator, SA, and AG Rozenberg","This article presents data from a review of published works on the economic damage caused by invasive plant species, their ecological and economical impact, and the legal regulation of biological invasions.
It is concluded that it is necessary to elaborate and adopt a national strategy on alien species, federal regulatory acts concerning the policy on invasive organisms, and general approaches and criteria to evaluate the risk of their spread. Effective control of invasive species is only possible at the rational approach, which takes into consideration individual ecological-biological features of the species, their relations with other components of the community, the properties of the ecosystem invaded by them, expenditures for their control, and the period and consequences of their eradication.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,NA,NA,non-urban,N,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,2370000000.00,,,1868760747.50,1944855521.77,2370000000.00,1868760747.50,1944855521.77,NZD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,,Ana Novoa,No
SC300_Gruber,TC,Gruber2021,Predicting socio-economic and biodiversity impacts of invasive species: Red Imported Fire Ant in the developing western Pacific,Gruber et al. ,"Effective biosecurity and pest management are fundamental to sustainable development. Invasive ants pose significant risks to the environment and economy, which are well-managed by biosecurity agencies in developed countries. However, a comprehen- sive view of the potential impacts of invasive ants in developing Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs) is lacking. We quantified the potential costs of the Red Imported Fire Ant (Solenopsis invicta Buren) across multiple sectors using an extrapolation analysis. Overall, we estimated that the impacts of Red Imported Fire Ant on developing PICTs could amount to over USD 329 million annually, corresponding to approximately 0.7% of combined GDP. Over half of the costs were predicted to result from impacts on the agriculture sector, a major source of employment and subsistence. We found that over 350 highly threatened species could be at risk from Red Imported Fire Ant. We would expect countries with Least Developed Country status and relatively low GDP to be least able to respond to an incursion of these ants, and as a result the costs could be higher than we have extrapolated. Red Imported Fire Ant could therefore potentially have considerable impact on the on-going development of the region.",2021,English,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,New Zealand,,Tokelau,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3488.00,,,3488.00,,3488.00,3488.00,,USD,2017,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Health,Medical costs,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Table 4, people stung annually and cost of medical attention. We estimated that over 7.6 million people would be stung annually by Red Imported Fire Ant with at least 76,000 suffering a severe reaction. We calculated health impacts based on the estimated average annual medical cost per household (Lard et al. 2001), which was USD 13.95.",Elena Angulo/Alok Bang,Yes
SC322_Gruber,TC,Gruber2021,Predicting socio-economic and biodiversity impacts of invasive species: Red Imported Fire Ant in the developing western Pacific,Gruber et al. ,"Effective biosecurity and pest management are fundamental to sustainable development. Invasive ants pose significant risks to the environment and economy, which are well-managed by biosecurity agencies in developed countries. However, a comprehen- sive view of the potential impacts of invasive ants in developing Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs) is lacking. We quantified the potential costs of the Red Imported Fire Ant (Solenopsis invicta Buren) across multiple sectors using an extrapolation analysis. Overall, we estimated that the impacts of Red Imported Fire Ant on developing PICTs could amount to over USD 329 million annually, corresponding to approximately 0.7% of combined GDP. Over half of the costs were predicted to result from impacts on the agriculture sector, a major source of employment and subsistence. We found that over 350 highly threatened species could be at risk from Red Imported Fire Ant. We would expect countries with Least Developed Country status and relatively low GDP to be least able to respond to an incursion of these ants, and as a result the costs could be higher than we have extrapolated. Red Imported Fire Ant could therefore potentially have considerable impact on the on-going development of the region.",2021,English,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,New Zealand,,Tokelau,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,38886.00,,,38886.00,,38886.00,38886.00,,USD,2017,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage repair,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Table 4, projected annual RIFA costs to schools and electrical infrastructure.",Elena Angulo/Alok Bang,Yes
SC357_Gruber,TC,Gruber2021,Predicting socio-economic and biodiversity impacts of invasive species: Red Imported Fire Ant in the developing western Pacific,Gruber et al. ,"Effective biosecurity and pest management are fundamental to sustainable development. Invasive ants pose significant risks to the environment and economy, which are well-managed by biosecurity agencies in developed countries. However, a comprehen- sive view of the potential impacts of invasive ants in developing Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs) is lacking. We quantified the potential costs of the Red Imported Fire Ant (Solenopsis invicta Buren) across multiple sectors using an extrapolation analysis. Overall, we estimated that the impacts of Red Imported Fire Ant on developing PICTs could amount to over USD 329 million annually, corresponding to approximately 0.7% of combined GDP. Over half of the costs were predicted to result from impacts on the agriculture sector, a major source of employment and subsistence. We found that over 350 highly threatened species could be at risk from Red Imported Fire Ant. We would expect countries with Least Developed Country status and relatively low GDP to be least able to respond to an incursion of these ants, and as a result the costs could be higher than we have extrapolated. Red Imported Fire Ant could therefore potentially have considerable impact on the on-going development of the region.",2021,English,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,New Zealand,,Tokelau,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,9540.00,,,9540.00,,9540.00,9540.00,,USD,2017,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,Table 3. RIFA costs to the livestock sector: pigs,Elena Angulo/Alok Bang,Yes
SC377_Gruber,TC,Gruber2021,Predicting socio-economic and biodiversity impacts of invasive species: Red Imported Fire Ant in the developing western Pacific,Gruber et al. ,"Effective biosecurity and pest management are fundamental to sustainable development. Invasive ants pose significant risks to the environment and economy, which are well-managed by biosecurity agencies in developed countries. However, a comprehen- sive view of the potential impacts of invasive ants in developing Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs) is lacking. We quantified the potential costs of the Red Imported Fire Ant (Solenopsis invicta Buren) across multiple sectors using an extrapolation analysis. Overall, we estimated that the impacts of Red Imported Fire Ant on developing PICTs could amount to over USD 329 million annually, corresponding to approximately 0.7% of combined GDP. Over half of the costs were predicted to result from impacts on the agriculture sector, a major source of employment and subsistence. We found that over 350 highly threatened species could be at risk from Red Imported Fire Ant. We would expect countries with Least Developed Country status and relatively low GDP to be least able to respond to an incursion of these ants, and as a result the costs could be higher than we have extrapolated. Red Imported Fire Ant could therefore potentially have considerable impact on the on-going development of the region.",2021,English,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,New Zealand,,Tokelau,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,48204.00,,,48204.00,,48204.00,48204.00,,USD,2017,Effective,Potential,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"Table 2. RIFA cost to cropping: coconuts, other fruit, roots and tubers",Elena Angulo/Alok Bang,Yes
SC2725,WoS,Egeter et al 2019,using molecular diet analysis to inform invasive species management: a case study of introduced rats consuming endemic new zealand frogs,Egeter B et al ,"The decline of amphibians has been of international concern for more than two decades,
and the global spread of introduced fauna is a major factor in this decline.
Conservation management decisions to implement control of introduced fauna are
often based on diet studies. One of the most common metrics to report in diet studies
is Frequency of Occurrence (FO), but this can be difficult to interpret, as it does
not include a temporal perspective. Here, we examine the potential for FO data derived
from molecular diet analysis to inform invasive species management, using invasive
ship rats (Rattus rattus) and endemic frogs (Leiopelma spp.) in New Zealand as
a case study. Only two endemic frog species persist on the mainland. One of these,
Leiopelma archeyi, is Critically Endangered (IUCN 2017) and ranked as the world's
most evolutionarily distinct and globally endangered amphibian (EDGE, 2018). Ship
rat stomach contents were collected by kill?trapping and subjected to three methods
of diet analysis (one morphological and two DNA?based). A new primer pair was developed
targeting all anuran species that exhibits good coverage, high taxonomic
resolution, and reasonable specificity. Incorporating a temporal parameter allowed
us to calculate the minimum number of ingestion events per rat per night, providing
a more intuitive metric than the more commonly reported FO. We are not aware of
other DNA?based diet studies that have incorporated a temporal parameter into FO
data. The usefulness of such a metric will depend on the study system, in particular
the feeding ecology of the predator. Ship rats are consuming both species of native
frogs present on mainland New Zealand, and this study provides the first detections
of remains of these species in mammalian stomach contents.",2019,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse/Unspecified,Semi-aquatic,Semi-Aquatic,Forest,1,,NA,NA,Oceania,New Zealand,,,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2019,2019,Potentially ongoing,70000000.00,,,46655818.36,,70000000.00,46655818.36,,AUD,2019,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,no,"I said no reliability because I can't find this cost in the source they cite being_The New Zealand Government spends over NZD
$70 million per year on the control of invasive species (Department
of Conservation, 2016)",Celine Albert,no
SC2843,WoS,Ferguson et al 2019,quantifying the economic cost of invertebrate pests to new zealand's pastoral industry,Ferguson CM et al ,"The invertebrate pests most commonly affecting New Zealand’s
pastoral-based production in ‘average’ years cause losses of
between $1.7B and $2.3B p.a. of which up to $0.9B occur on sheep
and beef farms and $1.4B on dairy farms. The native scarab grass
grub is the most costly pest causing losses of $140–380 M on dairy
farms and $75–205 M on sheep and beef farms annually. The exotic
scarab, black beetle, although only affecting approximately 1 M ha,
costs dairy farmers up to $223 M and sheep and beef farmers up to
$19 M annually. Porina cause losses up to $84 M and $88 M
respectively. Pasture nematodes are estimated to cost up to
$274 M p.a. for dairy farmers and $326 M p.a. for sheep and beef
farmers. Two exotic pests, Argentine stem weevil (ASW) and clover
root weevil (CRW) are causing damage estimated at up to $200 M
p.a. and $235 M p.a. respectively in dairy and sheep and beef
pastures. While CRW is subject to successful biological control
management it still causes considerable losses. Lesser pests also
contribute to lost production, particularly as they often coexist with
more major pests. However, their economic cost to New Zealand is
difficult to calculate due to the variable nature of infestations on
both temporal and spatial scales. At farm and paddock level, it is
abundantly clear that substantial savings could be made if pest
management is achieved. It is equally clear that in many instances
the tools to do so are limited but if developed would contribute
substantially to farm profitability.",2019,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Invertebrates,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,12b,,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2019,2019,Potentially ongoing,2000000000.00,1700000000.00,2300000000.00,24.32,20.07,28.12,24.32,20.07,NZD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,High,,,,,no,"The invertebrate pests most commonly affecting New Zealand’s pastoral-based production in ‘ average’ years cause losses of between $1.7B and $2.3B p.a. This paper is a review, so I only took the global cost they found",Celine Albert,no
350,TC,451,Operational report for Kiore Eradication in the Taranga (Hen) Island,Hawkins ,,2011,English,Official report,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Rodents,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Taranga,Unit (509 Ha),Until 2011,Period,Unspecified,2011,,2011,One-time,185000.00,,,201597.27,171735.25,,,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,In Holmes : Implementation : 185 000 USD 2013. Eradication end date 2011 ,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
352,TC,225,Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Holmes et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Predators,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rangitoto/Motutapu ,"Unit (3,842 Ha)",Until 2011,Period,Unspecified,2011,,2011,One-time,739000.00,,,764263.21,748752.68,,,,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Hunting and trapping predators Eradication end date 2011  
Implementation 739 000 USD. Estimated From Griffiths et al 2014 (not found) + unpublished data
""Implementation cost based on cat, stoat and hedgehog removal. Likely an underestimate because removal effort subsidized by toxicant use for rodents within the same program""
Comment (Philips 2016) : Rodent and Predator combined—total reported cost was $2.559 M ($941-P/$1618-I).
• Griffiths et al. (2015, p. 1365) reports a similar total cost $2.613 M (overhead excluded and 2014 used as year of report- ing to correspond with article submission year); however, this included the cost to remove rabbits, which are neither rodent nor predator.
• Griffiths et al. (2015, p. 1365) report 12 % of total project cost spent on planning and compliance; Holmes et al. planning cost equal 37 % ($941 of $2559).
• Griffiths et al. (2015, p. 1365) report 46 % of implementation costs were spent on removing rodents; Holmes et al. imple- mentation cost for rodents equals 54 % ($879 of $1618).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
353,TC,225,Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Holmes et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Rodents,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rangitoto/Motutapu ,"Unit (3,842 Ha)",Until 2009,Period,Unspecified,2009,,2009,One-time,1758000.00,,,1818098.40,1781200.57,,,,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Aerial rodenticide, rodent. Eradication end date 2009  
Planning + Implementation = 879 000 + 879 000 = 1 758 000 USD 2013. Estimated From Griffiths et al 2014 (not found) + unpublished data
Comment (Philips 2016) Rodent and Predator combined—total reported cost was $2.559 M ($941-P/$1618-I).
• Griffiths et al. (2015, p. 1365) reports a similar total cost $2.613 M (overhead excluded and 2014 used as year of report- ing to correspond with article submission year); however, this included the cost to remove rabbits, which are neither rodent nor predator.
• Griffiths et al. (2015, p. 1365) report 12 % of total project cost spent on planning and compliance; Holmes et al. planning cost equal 37 % ($941 of $2559).
• Griffiths et al. (2015, p. 1365) report 46 % of implementation costs were spent on removing rodents; Holmes et al. imple- mentation cost for rodents equals 54 % ($879 of $1618).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
359,TC,204,Beyond Kapiti - a decade of invasive rodent eradications from New Zealand islands + Unpublished data,Broome ,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,Holmes et al. 2016. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,Y,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Little Barrier,"Unit (3,083 Ha)",Until 2004,Period,Unspecified,2004,,2004,One-time,520700.00,,,594926.60,647651.00,,,,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"In original paper (Broome) : 750,000NZ$ 1996 <=> 520 700 US$ 2009
In Holmes et al. : Planning 286 000 + Implementation  613000 + Non targets : 49000. Eradication end date 2004  
(RG Unpublished data) and Broome 2009",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
378,TC,302,"Eradication of Kiore (Rattus exulans) from Double Island, Mercury Group in Northern New Zealand",McFadden,,1992,English,Official report,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Double Island (larger island),Unit (19 Ha),Until 1989,Period,Unspecified,1989,,1989,One-time,19850.00,,,34676.02,43407.52,,,,USD,1992,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Gross cost for eradication on large island = 19850$.  Eradication end date 1989
Implementation 5000 + isolation 1000 in Holmes et al
Comment Philips 2015 : ""Double Island (large)—Total reported was cost $5 K, citing McFadden (1992).
• McFadden (1992, p. 9) reports net project cost was $7 K, including poison, salaries, supplies, boat charters, and sundries (Note: Holmes et al. appear to have used the information in Table 2, p. 8 from McFadden (1992), which reported partial project cost, and is repeated for Double Island (small) and Hawea).
• McFadden (1992, p. 9) reports Isolation costs (boat charter); Holmes et al. omit these data from that cost center.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
379,TC,302,"Eradication of Kiore (Rattus exulans) from Double Island, Mercury Group in Northern New Zealand",McFadden,,1992,English,Official report,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Double Island (smaller island),Unit (8 Ha),Until 1989,Period,Unspecified,1989,,1989,One-time,14915.00,,,26055.06,32615.78,,,,USD,1992,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,"Gross cost for eradication on small island = 14915$ Eradication end date 1989
(Implementation 3000 + isolation 1000 in Holmes et al
Philips 2015 : Double Island (small)—Total reported cost was $2 K, citing McFadden (1992).
• McFadden (1992, p. 9) reports net project cost was $17 K, including silos, poison, salaries, supplies, boat charters, and sundries.
• Isolation (boat charter) costs reported by McFadden (1992); Holmes et al. omit these data from that cost center",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
500,WoS,2747,A modelling framework for predicting the optimal balance between control and surveillance effort in the local eradication of tuberculosis in New Zealand wildlife,Gormley et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Brushtail possum/tuberculosis,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Ashley Buffer Vector Control Zone (South Island),"Unit (28,000 Ha)",Unspecified,Period,Unspecified,2016,,2016,One-time,2375000.00,1550000.00,3200000.00,1688512.29,1652221.55,,,,NZD,2016,Publication year,Potential,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,no,Prototypical modelling framework to evaluate optimization of the allocation of scarce resources (i.e. operational funding) between pest control and disease surveillance. Case study of bovine TB transmitted by possums => possum control. Goal to achieve and declare TB freedom in possums.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
726,GS,307,Invasive alien species: a toolkit of best prevention and management practices,Wittenberg and Cock,,2001,English,Book,"Bakkes, J., Bolt, K., Braeuer, I., ten Brink, B., Chiabai, A., Ding, H., … Walpole, M. (2008). The Cost of Policy Inaction. The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target. Environment, 0044 (May 2008), 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20616833 --> McNeely, J. A., Mooney, H. A., Neville, L. E., Schei, P. J., & Waage, J. K. (Eds.). (2001). Global Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK: IUCN",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Mesostigmata,Varroidae,Varroa,Varroa destructor,,Varroa mite,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,,2001,Potentially ongoing,434500000.00,267000000.00,602000000.00,601493555.86,971322889.62,,,,USD,2001,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,no,"""In New Zealand, the varroa mite is a series pest in honeybee hives and is expected to have an economic cost of US$ 267-602 million, and force beekeepers to alter the way that manage their hives. Beekeepers argue that had border rules been followed or had surveillance detected the mite earlier, the problem could have been avoided entirely. It appears too late to eradicate the mite. (Wittenberg et al, 2001, cited in McNeely et al (2001)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1828,TC,37,The estimated costs of weeds to the agricultural sector of the New Zealand economy,Monsanto New Zealand Limited,,1984,English,Discussion paper,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,IAS plants - “weeds”,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,,,non-urban,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Period,Unspecified,1984,,1984,Potentially ongoing,340000000.00,,,648077716.58,1144333100.14,,,,NZD,1982,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,No,"“Drawing the conclusions from the data and assumptions it is possible to put a figure of about $340 milliom (FOB prices, 1982 – Reserve Bank statistics) in lost production as a result of weed cover.”; “From available data drawn from both published research findings and unpublished but nonetheless authoritative sosurces it is possible to estimate a gross opportunity loss of nearly $340 million at 1982/83 FOB prices.”",Ivan Jaric,Yes
SC47,TC,EMTC_10,Economics of controlling Carduus nutans on grazed pasture in New Zealand,Moore et al,,1989,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Carduus,Carduus nutan,,Thistle,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Unit (ha),Unspecified,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,,,One-time,60.50,,,71.54,77.25,,,,NZD,1989,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management,Post-invasion management,Low,,,,,yes,"The reported cost is over 10 years in 0,1% of Thitle ground cover",Elena Manfrini,No
SC1487,,Dickie_etal2011,Ecosystem service and biodiversity trade-offs in two woody successions,"Dickie IA, Yeates GW, St J, Mark G, Stevenson BA, Scott JT, Rillig MC, Peltzer DA, Orwin KH, Kirschbaum MUF, Hunt JE, Burrows LE, Barbour MM, Aislabie J","1. Many grasslands worldwide are undergoing succession to woody vegetation, causing complex effects on carbon (C) sequestration, nutrient cycling and biodiversity. Land managers are frequently tasked with maximizing ecosystem services and biodiversity. Nonetheless, there are few studies quantifying trade?offs between ecosystem services and biodiversity during early woody succession. 2. We assessed the consequences of woody succession for C stocks, above? and below?ground taxa richness (plants, nematodes, mites, microbes, fungi), and soil ecosystem function at one site with a native tree, Kunzea ericoides , and one site with a non?native tree, Pinus nigra , both establishing in conservation grasslands. 3. Woody succession at both sites was associated with large gains in above?ground C stocks and, under P. nigra , losses from the mineral soil?C pool. 4. Taxa richness responses were complex, nonlinear and incongruent. While some taxa showed initial increases in richness with woody succession (e.g. plants), other taxa had rapid declines (e.g. plant?feeding and plant?associated nematodes, oribatid mites). 5. Below?ground ecosystem functioning shifted towards increased bacterial energy channels with woody succession, despite no change in bacterial or fungal biomass or fungal hyphal lengths. Most other soil measures were consistent with literature expectations (increased C:N ratios, release of recalcitrant phosphorus). 6. Synthesis and applications. Our gradient?based measurements of woody succession effects on ecosystems did not follow expectations based on comparing end?points of grasslands to homogeneous mature forest. The discordance of biodiversity responses across taxonomic groups suggests that managers cannot rely on the indicator?species concept to ensure conservation of cryptic biodiversity. Carbon sequestration and biodiversity followed non?congruent patterns, with significant losses of taxa richness from some functional groups during woody succession. Management to maximize individual ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration may therefore result in significant negative effects on biodiversity of some, but not all, taxa.",2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pinopsida,Pinales,Pinaceae,Pinus,Pinus spp.,,Unspecified,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,New Zealand grasslands,4,non-urban,NA,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,NA,Country,Unspecified,Unspecified,Unspecified,Unspecified,,,Potentially ongoing,10000000.00,,,8608830.69,7333629.43,,,,NZD,2011,Publication Year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Eradication,Management,Post-invasion management,High,,,,,No,"Page 927: ""For example, a NZD$10 million project to preserve biodiversity by removing non-native invasive pines from New Zealand grasslands was recently put on hold because of a NZD$3 million liability for C-loss under the Kyoto Protocol (Williams 2009)."" Williams 2009 only refers to the $3 million liability, not the $10 million cost, so that $10 million cost is attributed to Dickie2011.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC2264,TC,EMTC_10,Economics of controlling Carduus nutans on grazed pasture in New Zealand,Moore et al,,1989,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Carduus,Carduus nutan,,Thistle,Terrestrial,Terrestrial,NA,4b,non-urban,N,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Unit (ha),Unspecified,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,,,One-time,911.00,468.00,1354.00,1077.25,1163.17,,,,NZD,1989,Publication year,Potential,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage,NA,Low,,,,,yes,The reported cost is over 10 years due to the infestation of the plant,Elena Manfrini,No