Program of study/ Major
Year of study
1. Manikin-based simulation helps in eliminating mistakes when performing medical procedures more than SP-based simulation
2. Using manikin-based simulation enhances team work and management more than SP-based simulation
3. Using manikin-based simulation encourages development of communication skills more than SP-based simulation
4. Using manikin-based simulation enables learning about various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures more than SP-based simulation
5. Using manikin-based simulation enables learning rare and pathological cases more than SP-based simulation
6. Using manikin-based simulation enables technical skills development more than SP-based simulation
7. Using manikin-based simulation limits the sense of realism of particular clinical cases more than SP-based simulation
8. Using manikin-based simulation makes the learning experience artificial more than SP-based simulation
9. The irresponsiveness of a manikin can limit the fluency of interaction and making decisions
10. Manikin-based simulation can help in the process of learning patient history taking more than SP-based simulation
11. Manikin-based simulation enhances appropriate professional performance when performing medical procedures more than SP-based simulation
12. Physical examination performed on a manikin enables better understanding of patient reactions than the one performed on an SP
13. Manikin-based simulation enables better understanding of patient rights more than SP-based simulation
14. Communication during manikin-based simulation classes helps to develop proper doctor – patient rapport more than during SP-based classes
15. The scope of possible medical procedures is limited during manikin-based simulation classes more than during SP-based classes
16. The possibility to present rare and pathological findings in a manikin broadens the range of diagnostic and treatment procedures that can be learnt
17. It is harder to be concerned with an issue of patient privacy and intimacy when performing a procedure on a manikin rather than on an SP
18. Manikin-based simulation enables development of non-technical skills more than SP-based simulation
19. The lack of possibility to feel the real body of a patient and observe his/her reactions to touch during physical examination limits the reliability of the case and, thereby, of the learning process, during manikin-based simulation
20. The lack of possibility to observe patient subjective reactions during physical examination limits the reliability of the case and, thereby, of the learning process, during manikin-based simulation
21. Manikin-based simulated scenario is more realistic than SP-based scenario
22. Manikin-based simulation and entailed technical limitations of manikin-based scenarios affects the level of realism more than SP-based simulation
23. The lack of diversity of manikin’s looks and behaviour can affect the sense of realism during simulation scenario
24. SP-based simulation helps eliminating mistakes when performing medical procedures more than manikin-based simulation
25. Using SP-based simulation enhances team work and management more than manikin-based simulation
26. Using SP-based simulation can encourages development of communication skills more than manikin-based simulation
27. Using SP-based simulation enables learning about various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures more than manikin-based simulation
28. Using SP-based simulation enables learning rare and pathological cases more than manikin-based simulation
29. Using SP-based simulation enables technical skills development more than manikin-based simulation
30. Using SP-based simulation limits the sense of realism of particular clinical cases more than manikin-based simulation
31. Using SP-based simulation makes the learning experience artificial more than manikin-based simulation
32. The responsiveness of an SP affects the fluency of interaction and making decisions
33. SP-based simulation can help in the process of learning patient history taking more than manikin-based simulation
34. SP-based simulation enhances appropriate professional performance when performing medical procedures more than manikin-based simulation
35. Physical examination performed on an SP enables better understanding of patient reactions than the one performed on a manikin
36. SP-based simulation enables better understanding of patient rights more than manikin-based simulation
37. Communication during SP-based simulation classes helps to develop proper doctor – patient rapport more than during manikin-based classes
38. The scope of possible medical procedures is limited during SP-based simulation classes more than during manikin-based classes
39. The lack of possibility to present rare and pathological findings in an SP limits the range of diagnostic and treatment procedures that can be learnt
40. It is easier to be concerned with an issue of patient privacy and intimacy when performing a procedure on an SP rather than on a manikin
41. SP-based simulation enables development of non-technical skills more than manikin-based simulation
42. The possibility to feel the real body of a patient and observe his/her reactions to touch during physical examination increases the reliability of the case and, thereby, of the learning process, during SP-based simulation
43. The possibility to observe patient subjective reactions during physical examination increases the reliability of the case and, thereby, of the learning process, during SP-based simulation
44. SP-based simulated scenario is more realistic than manikin-based scenario
45. SP-based simulation and entailed technical limitations of SP-based scenarios affects the level of realism more than manikin-based simulation